So who's going to try this out:
http://www.firingsquad.com/media/hirez.asp?file=/hardware/asus_striker_extreme_preview/images/15.JPG
http://www.firingsquad.com/media/hirez.asp?file=/hardware/asus_striker_extreme_preview/images/15.JPG
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
fmah said:So who's going to try this out:
http://www.firingsquad.com/media/hirez.asp?file=/hardware/asus_striker_extreme_preview/images/15.JPG
fmah said:So who's going to try this out:
http://www.firingsquad.com/media/hirez.asp?file=/hardware/asus_striker_extreme_preview/images/15.JPG
Jod said:You guys know the opening scene of 3D Mark 2006, right? When the troops are in the ship waiting to land? Well, normally it's around 35FPS on the X1900XT 512MB. I almost passed out when I saw 75. Went on to score 10,965 with stock speeds on the 88.
crfracer290 said:Jod, so the textures and jaggies dont seem to move as you run by them? that was one thing that annoyed me in BF2142 with my 1900xtx
(Clanger)(DOA) said:honestly if one card is bottlenecked by the cpu then..... well ahhh..
fmah said:The "theory" is that the 3rd card would function as a physics processor.
Fr3@k3r said:ok well i did another 3dmark06 run @ 2.45ghz on my opty at 650/900 speeds on my gts got a 8198 score...
Rattle said:I guess it would take alot of load off the cpu perhaps?