- Joined
- Oct 23, 2003
thank you capitan obvious.
just thought i would add
No problem. Anytime.
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
thank you capitan obvious.
just thought i would add
Until then the games need not LOOK better and better... It'd be much better for the gamers if the games just PLAYED better and better.
Talk about a thread necro...
I dont think they have anything like that possible. Pretty sure the software writers code around the fact the PS3 is light on ram and powerful with the Cell Technology. At least for the mainstream exclusive titles.
I am pretty sure the reason both systems were so light on the RAM was the whole price-fixing scam between the major retailers back in that timeframe. Ram was a hell of a lot more expensive back then.
Doesn't matter, they should have 12gb of memory for both consoles. No excuses.
The RAM to the PS3 is the same as every other console, firmly soldered onto the main PCB.
The PS3 has 256mb of GDDR3 and 256Mb of some form of DDR.
The 360 has 512mb of unified GDDR3 for both the CPU and GPU, and the GPU has a 10mb framebuffer.
The 10mb framebuffer is extremely useful and the 360's OS takes up about 22mb, vs the PS3's 90+mb OS.
The only console I know of that has expandable RAM is the N64...
I read a few different articles now at Tom's Hardware talking about how much of an improvement people saw with upgrading the PS3 Hard-Drive to Solid State. Ram would be nice too...oh well.
I read a few different articles now at Tom's Hardware talking about how much of an improvement people saw with upgrading the PS3 Hard-Drive to Solid State. Ram would be nice too...oh well.
that expansion pack was the ram upgrade. it came with a game only i think...but what game was it....i can't remember. perfect dark? all i know is that i noticed almost no improvement on my n64.