Page 1 of 6 1 2 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 104
  1. #1
    juane414's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    1,652

    3 Core Phenom is real

    Wow, I was very skeptical of the rumors of a three core phenom CPU... but now it is apparently official! News
    I'm very suprised, but also very excited. This is a whole new area of the market that Intel hasn't gotten into yet. AMD will not only have the only "native" quad core CPU's but now the only triple core CPU's as well. Now the only problem is I don't know what to get!

    CPU AMD FX-8320 @ 4.2GHz/240x17.5/1.4v
    Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
    RAM 16GB (2x8GB) G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3 1600 @ 800MHz
    GPU Asus Radeon HD 6850
    SSD Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB
    PSU NZXT Hale82 750W
    Cooler Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus
    Case Cooler Master RC-690 II Advanced
    Folding User Stats

  2. #2
    Member TimoneX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    3,628
    ummm...penryn? J/K
    Giga UD3Rv2 - i7 970 - 4x4GB DDR3 - MSI 6950-6970 - Adaptec 3085 - 2x64GB M4 SSD R0 - 4x1TB Sammy F3 - DD TDX - Ultra X3 800
    Heat under TimoneX - Bitcoin 1Hfp99tugY4H5FYEoM3hj4JDLzShzZ9ifB

  3. #3
    ancalime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,302
    You don't know what to get? 3 or 4?..hmm

    Well I guess price will be a factor but I think with the low costs of quads now, buying a triple core wouldn't be worth it IMO.
    Main Rig
    CPU: AMD X2 4200+ @ 2.71 GHz (258 x 10.5) | Motherboard: ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe
    GPU: EVGA Geforce 7800 GT (SLI) 465/1101
    HDD: Western Digital 80GB | RAM: 2GB Patriot DDR 400 2-3-3-5

    C2D Rig
    CPU: Intel E6750 @ 3.7GHz | Motherboard: ASUS P5Q Pro
    GPU: EVGA GTX260
    HDD: 2x Western Digital Raptor 150GB RAID 0 | RAM: 2GB Patriot Extreme Performance DDR2 800 4-4-4-12 1T

    Heat

  4. #4
    Member DragoXT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    559
    Well it doesnt really matter about the price, the fact that AMD has something that intel cannot match in the lower end chips, is a good thing for AMD. Till intel makes a native quad core the correct way like AMD, then they cannot answer a triple core cpu which will beat a dual core in multithreaded apps. This lets AMD capitalize on their quads that dont quite make it up to spec so they dont loose as much from a production stand point.
    AMD Phenom 2 970BE.......................................AMD 3400+ Newcastle
    Gigabyte 890FXA-UD5 v2.1...............................Abit KV-85
    2x2gb Corsair Dominator @1600 8-8-8-24.......2x512mb OCZ DDR 400 Platinum rev 2 @400 2-2-2-5
    Asus GTX460 1gb TOP.......................................Albatron Trinity 6800GT w/ NV Silencer 5 rev.3
    WD Black 640gb............................................. ..Seagate 7200.7 SATA NCQ 160gb
    Zalman CNPS10X Performa...............................ThermalTake Venus 12
    Seasonic X650 Gold..........................................Ther malTake Pure Power 420
    NZXT Guardian 921 RB.......................................Xblade
    Asus VW224U 22" LCD......................................Samtron 17" CRT

  5. #5
    Member TimoneX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    3,628
    I'm not sure it's quite that simple, but I do hope AMD has a winner with the triple cores. We need the lower prices and innovation that two great CPU companies brings and AMD is clearly on the ropes right now.
    Giga UD3Rv2 - i7 970 - 4x4GB DDR3 - MSI 6950-6970 - Adaptec 3085 - 2x64GB M4 SSD R0 - 4x1TB Sammy F3 - DD TDX - Ultra X3 800
    Heat under TimoneX - Bitcoin 1Hfp99tugY4H5FYEoM3hj4JDLzShzZ9ifB

  6. #6
    Member Molester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Dallas, Tx
    Posts
    2,022
    Quote Originally Posted by DragoXT View Post
    Well it doesnt really matter about the price, the fact that AMD has something that intel cannot match in the lower end chips, is a good thing for AMD. Till intel makes a native quad core the correct way like AMD, then they cannot answer a triple core cpu which will beat a dual core in multithreaded apps. This lets AMD capitalize on their quads that dont quite make it up to spec so they dont loose as much from a production stand point.
    spot on

  7. #7
    Member Neuromancer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tau'ri
    Posts
    8,159
    "By regulating the speed at which each core operates, AMD could conceivably sell a triple-core chip that has higher performance metrics than one of its own quad-core chips, said Insight 64 analyst Nathan Brookwood."

    Well at first I thoughyt DUH triple core? Ridiculous... reading that... I still think triple core is ridiculous, but the ability to clock each core independently is aweseom and would be a real boon to the user.

    Now what I think a triple core should be used for?

    A regular old dual core CPU with an additional one core dedicated as a physics processor.

  8. #8
    Member SeasonalEclipse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,594
    Wasnt there a study a year or two ago saying that tri core would be very inefficient compared to dual or quad?

    The Beast(Main)- P5QL/EPU, Q9550, 4GB DDR2 800, 2X320GB Perp, 750GB Cavalier,8800GT(for now) Corsair 750 Watt PSU, Enermax server case, 2x Dell 1908WFP, Vista Home
    http://heatware.com/eval.php?id=51210

  9. #9
    Super Moderator
    Audioaficionado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Medford, Orygun
    Posts
    10,985
    I'd prefer that the 3 core chips aren't 4 core rejects but that the extra core was disabled by design or a designed triple core. That would give me more confidence in the longevity and performance of said triple core.

    I also think the price should reflect a price per core average at the very least. If the triple core was half of a quad, that would make it even more attractive for us and system builders.

    It's all about the bang for the buck baby!

    Not the brand names
    .....................................My HeatwareMyFAH Stats
    .......................Folding is a marathon, not a sprint audioaficionado
    Asus Commando, 8GB GSkill 5-5-5-15-2t PC6400, Q6600 @3.0GHz >SMP2+GPU3 FAH 24/7
    Gigabyte DS3, 3GB GSkill 5-5-5-15-2t PC6400, E6400 @3.0GHz
    Asus P5Q PRO Turbo, 4GB GSkill 5-5-5-15-2t PC6400, E6600 @3.0GHz
    Iwill DH800, 2GB OCZ4002048PFDC-K 2.5-3-3-8-1t, Dual 2.4 M0 Xeons 1.5v/880/3300
    Help improve overclockers.com! Get involved!

    You have over 101 signatures and Can't see the classifieds???Click This Link
    Anyone we catch cookie stuffing at this site will be banned on the spot!!

  10. #10
    Member Shell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    CYYZ Pearson
    Posts
    2,141
    Quote Originally Posted by SeasonalEclipse
    Wasnt there a study a year or two ago saying that tri core would be very inefficient compared to dual or quad?
    No... a core is a core, there are a number of applications that can make use of any odd number of cores. I can set affinity in MAYA to use only 3 cores without any problems, then I have a free core to keep working while rendering. The XBOX360 has a native Tri-Core CPU.
    Quote Originally Posted by Audioaficionado
    I'd prefer that the 3 core chips aren't 4 core rejects but that the extra core was disabled by design or a designed triple core. That would give me more confidence in the longevity and performance of said triple core.
    The 2Mb Core 2's have 1/2 of the L2 disabled and it does not suffer from such a thing. There's no such thing as a bad processor, just a processor with a dead component... they've been chopping components in video cards for years.

    The triple and quad Core Phenom would simply cost more if they did that.
    FX-6300@4.5GHz, 7770, 2x4GB DDR3-1600 CL8, PCP&C 400w, 2x1TB
    i5-4690K@4.5GHz, 7850, 2x4GB DDR3-2400 CL10, Seasonic G-550, 2x1TB

  11. #11
    Member ShadowPho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    I am in your stack, SUBbing your registers!
    Posts
    2,548
    Quote Originally Posted by DragoXT View Post
    Well it doesnt really matter about the price, the fact that AMD has something that intel cannot match in the lower end chips, is a good thing for AMD.
    But the price does matter. It is one of the most important thing that matters. It matters a lot. If the AMD's high end chips will equal Intel low end chips, then there is a disaster.

    If a quad core is $180, then nobody is going to pay $170 for a triple core.

    Thinking logically, ~$40 per core, so $140 for triple core would be reasonable. But then again, with the current price of sub $100 for GOOD dual cores it is not a viable option. The current Joe has no need for a third core. The enthusiast on the other hand will find uses for the fourth core.

    It depends on how well they market it.
    "Take only that which you can give"
    Need Help? IM me! I want to help the OC community!

    MainComputer:
    E6400@2.69-4.0 gig RAM-8800GT
    ASUS P5N-E SLI


  12. #12
    juane414's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    1,652
    Xbox360 seems to work well on three cores. Why not PC's? Perhaps the missing core will mean additional Cache? At the very least better heat dissipation.

    CPU AMD FX-8320 @ 4.2GHz/240x17.5/1.4v
    Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
    RAM 16GB (2x8GB) G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3 1600 @ 800MHz
    GPU Asus Radeon HD 6850
    SSD Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB
    PSU NZXT Hale82 750W
    Cooler Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus
    Case Cooler Master RC-690 II Advanced
    Folding User Stats

  13. #13
    Careface's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dunedin, New Zealand
    Posts
    2,330
    Nice. Though I was hoping it was going to be a "true" triple-core, not just a defective or speedbinned quad core. But only time will tell I guess
    One Team... One Universe... One Goal: The Truth...
    {OC*SETI}

    ...Because we are not alone...



  14. #14
    Member knightwolf6543's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Warren,MI, USA BABY!!
    Posts
    550
    Quote Originally Posted by ShadowPho View Post
    But the price does matter. It is one of the most important thing that matters. It matters a lot. If the AMD's high end chips will equal Intel low end chips, then there is a disaster.

    If a quad core is $180, then nobody is going to pay $170 for a triple core.

    Thinking logically, ~$40 per core, so $140 for triple core would be reasonable. But then again, with the current price of sub $100 for GOOD dual cores it is not a viable option. The current Joe has no need for a third core. The enthusiast on the other hand will find uses for the fourth core.

    It depends on how well they market it.
    then again that $140 tri core could be a top end cpu whilst that quad core could be low/mid end. plus for company's like dell when they but their chips in bulk there would be a huge price difference
    opteron 165 (ccbbe 0617) @ 2.73 Ghz (stock voltes )
    2x 7900 GS SLI!!! (580/798)
    Custom painted 3d Aroura Case
    2x 512 PQI pc-3200 @ 218
    DFI LP UT SLI-D
    Future system
    Phenom x4 black edition
    AMD 790FX DFI mobo
    cruical ballistix Tracer 4GB DDR-1066
    2 x Ati HD3870 X2
    AlabamaCajun is my hero

  15. #15
    AlabamaCajun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    A Labyrinth
    Posts
    6,176
    A true tri-core with would have the benefit of lowering cost per unit with less silicon used. These will be quads with one core disabled for not being able to pass the tests. Some should have all the L3 cache available unless the cache has bad banks. This may also be the case with dual cores that are quads with 2 non-functioning cores. AMD will fully warranty the chips so it's not a bad deal for the cost savings. If you consider that lifespan for most of our rigs is under 3 years before we upgrade then I'm sure you will not have a problem *1. Where I see these really doing will is playing the current games that only support 2 cores where the 3rd core is idle for background OS stuff to stay off the two active cores. Media centers will also get use for record, playback and other tasks.

    Read fast in low voice *1) Warranty void if de-lidded, over-volted, improper heatsink, physical damage, grilled on the barbe, beaten with a hammer, hooked up to a welding machine, car battary or house current.
    Main Rigs
    Developement -Phen2 1090T on Asus 870
    Fun -Callisto 555BE, Asus 990FX Sabortooth,ATI HD3870
    CDs, Labels, Printing etc- 5000BBE, GA790FX, Wintec 800 4G.HD2600XT
    Rendering Server- 4x Barcelona 8347s. Tyan S4980 Quad, 16G (2G Kingston per socket).
    Folding, Testing- Vista, Regor 265 X2 on Asus 880,
    dead- Phen2-940
    AM2, DFI790FX-M2R,Corsair-PC6400 CL4
    Theme Park Builder 3D The Game- Build-em and Ride-em.

  16. #16
    Member knightwolf6543's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Warren,MI, USA BABY!!
    Posts
    550
    plus this is good news for the quads as well, by geting money off of chips that would normaly be trashed or whatever they do with chips their not going to sell. they will be able to offer these chips at a very very low price , as well as driving down the price of quads, intel already said they were not offering any low priced quads.
    opteron 165 (ccbbe 0617) @ 2.73 Ghz (stock voltes )
    2x 7900 GS SLI!!! (580/798)
    Custom painted 3d Aroura Case
    2x 512 PQI pc-3200 @ 218
    DFI LP UT SLI-D
    Future system
    Phenom x4 black edition
    AMD 790FX DFI mobo
    cruical ballistix Tracer 4GB DDR-1066
    2 x Ati HD3870 X2
    AlabamaCajun is my hero

  17. #17
    Member AngelfireUk83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,027
    Dam shame Sk939 was killed off early I still say they could of done good stuff with that socket maybe even a triple core for that. I am really happy with my set-up but gotta move with the times and upgrade for future use.

    I hope AMD also captilise on this triple core feature but really good for business thats for sure and maybe pull AMD from the bottom a little. I am thinking of building another AMD rig and these triple cores if prices are good seem tempting DDR3 memory for 2GB has dropped madly one site selling OCZ for £40.
    OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit SP1
    Board: Gigabyte Z68AP-D3 Rev.1 F8
    CPU: INTEL i7 2600k 3.40ghz (Stock)
    RAM: Crucial Ballistix Elite 8GB 1866mhz DDR3 (1600mhz@1.60v)
    OS Storage: Crucial 128GB M4 SSD (FW 040H)
    Spare Storage: Seagate 500GB 7,200rpm, Hitachi 1TB 7,200rpm (Back-Up HDD)
    GPU/Audio: HIS 7850 2GB GDDR5 PCI-E Card (OC: 920/1270)
    PSU: OCZ Fatality 750w Modular PSU
    Optical: LG GH24NS90 24x DVD-RW

  18. #18
    DaPoets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Buffalo NY
    Posts
    678
    I think 3 core is a waste since most people w/ dual cores won't get it and the quad core of us kinda smirk at the puny 3 cores. The Q6600 is cheap too so why go 3 cores unless perhaps it's a really fast clock w/ a great potential of an overclock?

    I'm looking toward the 16 core, not backwards toward a 3 core...
    DaPoets
    - Antec 1200 Case - XP64 - Intel Q6600 Core 2 Quad B3 Lapped @ 3.4ghz - ASUS x2 3870x2 -
    - D975XBX2 Bad Axe 2 - (4x1GB) DDR2 800 4-4-4-12 - x4 HDD RAID 0 + 1 - Corsair 750TX 750w -
    - Lapped Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme Push Pull - CyberPower Intelligent LCD Series UPS CP1350AVRLCD 810 Watts -
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    -----------------------------------------
    "What would Optimus Prime do?"

  19. #19
    AlabamaCajun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    A Labyrinth
    Posts
    6,176
    Quote Originally Posted by DaPoets View Post
    I'm looking toward the 16 core, not backwards toward a 3 core...
    We (other ofc members) resembler this remark . But, as I've said the tri-core will be great of low cost HTPC, pvrs and folding layers.
    Main Rigs
    Developement -Phen2 1090T on Asus 870
    Fun -Callisto 555BE, Asus 990FX Sabortooth,ATI HD3870
    CDs, Labels, Printing etc- 5000BBE, GA790FX, Wintec 800 4G.HD2600XT
    Rendering Server- 4x Barcelona 8347s. Tyan S4980 Quad, 16G (2G Kingston per socket).
    Folding, Testing- Vista, Regor 265 X2 on Asus 880,
    dead- Phen2-940
    AM2, DFI790FX-M2R,Corsair-PC6400 CL4
    Theme Park Builder 3D The Game- Build-em and Ride-em.

  20. #20
    Member OBLIVIONLORD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,803
    Quote Originally Posted by DragoXT View Post
    Till intel makes a native quad core the correct way like AMD
    I hope you aren't serious with this statement

Page 1 of 6 1 2 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •