Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Member AngelfireUk83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,027

    New Killzone 2 Trailer (PS3) Uses RayTracing Technology

    http://www.gametrailers.com/player/34201.html

    The game will use RayTracing (see below on what that is) but it looks amazing I hope it's going to be like that for the full product like no framerate drops or slicing when your moving around etc but a defo game worth keeping an eye on. I'll admit I didn't like the 1st game on PS2 the movement of characters didn't feel right too stiff but this I can't wait to play a demo.

    The only problem I have is the A.I for the enemy they seem to run towards the explosive barrels and there seems to be no serious cover and flank but maybe it's the code and it'll be better in the final game.

    (Explanation of RayTracing)

    In computer graphics, ray tracing is a technique for generating an image by tracing the path of light through pixels in an image plane. The technique is capable of producing a very high degree of photorealism; usually higher than that of typical scanline rendering methods, but at a greater computational cost. This makes ray tracing best suited for applications where the image can be rendered slowly ahead of time, such as in still images and film and television special effects, and more poorly suited for real-time applications like computer games where speed is critical. Ray tracing is capable of simulating a wide variety of optical effects, such as reflection and refraction, scattering, and chromatic aberration.
    OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit SP1
    Board: Gigabyte Z68AP-D3 Rev.1 F8
    CPU: INTEL i7 2600k 3.40ghz (Stock)
    RAM: Crucial Ballistix Elite 8GB 1866mhz DDR3 (1600mhz@1.60v)
    OS Storage: Crucial 128GB M4 SSD (FW 040H)
    Spare Storage: Seagate 500GB 7,200rpm, Hitachi 1TB 7,200rpm (Back-Up HDD)
    GPU/Audio: HIS 7850 2GB GDDR5 PCI-E Card (OC: 920/1270)
    PSU: OCZ Fatality 750w Modular PSU
    Optical: LG GH24NS90 24x DVD-RW

  2. #2
    Member Hazaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,817
    Still the Pre-Alpha build, I wouldn't worry too much.

    Also the guy playing is amazing
    2500K @4.2GHz, P8P67 PRO, 8GB G.Skill Sniper, RocketFish Case, 2x 6950, X750 PSU, TRUE120


  3. #3
    Member tenchi86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Smoky Mountains, NC
    Posts
    3,633
    Wow, maybe the budget this game is getting will pay off. If this studio can really unleash the PS3s power then I hope they allow some of their techniques to be used by others. (Atleast in-house studios))
    "Millions saw the apple fall, but Newton was the one who asked why." -Bernard Mannes Baruch

    Mobo: MSI Neo2-V
    CPU: 2.8a Prescott @ 3.2
    PSU: Blue Storm 500 Watt
    GPU: Geforce 6600GT
    HS: Zalman 7000
    Ram: Kingston HyperX 1024mb 3200

  4. #4
    Member YellowDart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    3,684
    I'm not a Sony fan by any means... in fact, for the most part, I do my best not to buy any Sony products (not a fan of the company in general... my dislike is not just limited to Playstation products), but I'll be damned if that doesn't look like a really sweet FPS. Looks to be a strong possibility that Sony might break out of their crappy first-party FPS funk that they've been in. It looks great... as long as it's got a decent story, isn't super glitchy, has some form of online multiplayer, it should do well.
    XBL Gamertag: Cr0wN0 .:. Steam ID: yell0wdart

    Powdered Toast Man
    ~
    p4 2.6c @ 3.3 ducted to TT SF2 .:. 1g corsiar xms 400mhz .:. DFI PS83-BL .:. (RIP)HIS 9800pro IceQ @ 425/370 (now running nV 7300 256) .:. SB Audigy MP3+

    yell0wdart ~
    Dell XPS 720 .:. Core 2 Duo 2.13g (@ 2.4) .:. 4g DDR2 677 .:. 2x 160g HDD .:. 7900 GS (@ 558/751)

    Heat

  5. #5
    Member Seven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,277
    I wonder if this one was pre-rendered as well.

    But seriously. Once the game gets into even a beta state we'll know a bit better how it will actually perform. I'm just skeptical given the long and complicated history of this game.

    7

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,302
    Quote Originally Posted by Seven View Post
    I wonder if this one was pre-rendered as well.

    But seriously. Once the game gets into even a beta state we'll know a bit better how it will actually perform. I'm just skeptical given the long and complicated history of this game.

    7
    I felt deja-vu while watching the trailer for the game. It seemed like we already experienced the scene. It also did not look as good as the trailer for the original KZ.

    the OP's video was pretty good, but nothing that made me go WOW. same .... different day.
    ___________________________________________
    2560x1600

  7. #7
    Member Hardin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sumter, South Carolina
    Posts
    3,336
    The graphics looked pretty good, but the gameplay doesn't have much new and that convoy level reminds me of another fps. I think it was Quake 4.
    cpu-Intel Core i7 3770k
    ram-G.Skill 2x4gb DDR3-1600
    gpu-Radeon HD 7950
    motherboard-Asus P8Z68-V LE

  8. #8
    Member tenchi86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Smoky Mountains, NC
    Posts
    3,633
    /\That is true, but do games have to offer something new to be good? That being said gameplay looks like it is getting the back burner to graphics IMO.
    "Millions saw the apple fall, but Newton was the one who asked why." -Bernard Mannes Baruch

    Mobo: MSI Neo2-V
    CPU: 2.8a Prescott @ 3.2
    PSU: Blue Storm 500 Watt
    GPU: Geforce 6600GT
    HS: Zalman 7000
    Ram: Kingston HyperX 1024mb 3200

  9. #9
    Member Hardin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sumter, South Carolina
    Posts
    3,336
    Quote Originally Posted by tenchi86 View Post
    /\That is true, but do games have to offer something new to be good? That being said gameplay looks like it is getting the back burner to graphics IMO.
    Not necessarily but it just reminds me so much of Call of Duty 4 for some reason.
    cpu-Intel Core i7 3770k
    ram-G.Skill 2x4gb DDR3-1600
    gpu-Radeon HD 7950
    motherboard-Asus P8Z68-V LE

  10. #10
    Member Shell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    CYYZ Pearson
    Posts
    2,141
    Looks like a good-ole shoot em up with pretty graphics... kinds like HL2 or Painkiller (those fun, simple formula FPSs)

    It's hit or miss IMO.
    If it's good, it's very good.
    Otherwise it'll be bland.

    And the ray tracing refers to the global lighting model from the looks of it, gives some nice graphics but it's just raster with ray lights.
    FX-6300@4.5GHz, 7770, 2x4GB DDR3-1600 CL8, PCP&C 400w, 2x1TB
    i5-4690K@4.5GHz, 7850, 2x4GB DDR3-2400 CL10, Seasonic G-550, 2x1TB

  11. #11
    Registered kylzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Aberdeen,Scotland,UK
    Posts
    43
    WOW THOSES NADE BLOWING UP look good

  12. #12
    Member IR1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    San Jose, California
    Posts
    1,776
    The dude talking about the game is a total goober, "ooh I got that guys attention" uhh ok...

    Anyway the grphx do look pretty, we will see just how dynamic and smart the AI really is when it comes out, im not impressed by the AI just from the video though.
    Intel Core i5 2500k @ 4.5GHz
    Asus P8Z68-V
    8GB DDR3-1600 Patriot Viper Xtreme
    Visiontek 6950 2GB Ref. (stock)

    Lenovo Y500 - Core I7 2.4Ghz
    8GB DDR3-1600
    Nvidia GeForce GT650M SLI

  13. #13
    Member Vengance_01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Corona, CA
    Posts
    2,790
    looks nice, but again control plus FPS's just do not mix. AI also looked horrible.
    Workstation and Mobile Workstation

    Dell XPS 1330:
    Core 2 T7500, 3GB Ram, 320GB HD, 13.3 LED, 8400GS, 20inch Dell 2007WFP When at Home.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,112
    Killzone will probably be nice...

    But, the pumping up the of use of Raytracing has me very unimpressed. It's a gimick.

    I've been using raytracing with 3D rendering since the mid 90's. It's nothing new, and it can indeed produce nice visuals. I've certainly had some fun producing amazingly interesting and detailed still pictures utilizing very simple geometric objects and reflective and transparent surfaces combined with insanely cranked up raytracing. The computation cost involved with cranking up the effects and number of bounces and such gets insane really fast, though...it is not at all suited to real time rendering done in video games. The only way they could make it work is to strip it down to a very basic calculation that no longer provides those highly realistic results. Essentially, it's just another gimick visual effect like so many others. It might be a nice little effect when they're done with it, but there's lots of nice little effects out there. Most likely, it's a way for them to make their game look a little bit different from the rest rather than necessarily better - knowing that the computation power that they devote to it would otherwise be utilized for something else to improve visual quality. Kind of like Halo3 trading some HDR type lighting effects for rendering resolution.

  15. #15
    Member Springbok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,071
    Raytracing isn't being done on the fly, I asked a professional artist in the games industry, the raytracing is pre-calculated and then baked into the level. I believe they're using it for the god-rays coming through the window, but I'm not sure what else.
    CPU: i7 860 @3.37GHz
    GFX: EVGA 760GTX
    MOBO: Asus Sabertooth X58
    RAM: 8GB Corsair 1600
    PSU: Corsair 650W
    HSF: Thermalright Macho

  16. #16
    Member Shiggity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    4,429
    Neat

    Some ray tracing is better than none!
    CPU - E6750 @ 3.4GHz | 425x8 | 1.41V | Zalman CNPS9500 | Lapped
    Mobo - Abit P35 Pro | Bios v14
    Ram - 2x1GB G.Skill F2-6400CL5D-2GBNQ | 850 | 5-5-5-15 | 1.85V
    GPU - PNY 8800GT | 700c, 1850s, 900m | HR-03GT
    HD - 150GB raptor ADFD | Seagate 7200.7 160GB | 2x WD 640GB
    PSU - OCZ GameXSteam 700W


  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,112
    Okay, so now we have glitter beams stuck into the level.

    Which is nice, I'm all about nice artistry in lieu of using more and more processing to make things look good.

    Although, I wouldn't call it raytracing anymore. They might have used raytracing to create the visual, but it's not the game actually doing raytracing.

    It's like when Killer Instinct got put onto the SNES...the characters were 3D art pre-rendered into 2D sprites. The game was definitely a 2D game using sprites, but it looked kinda 3D because the art was made from 3D renderings.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •