Not both but, 16x 2.0 with one card, 8x/8x with two physical cards. None of that 16/4 crap like on the p35. Never really had an instant where I played a game that didn't support crossfire. Even if I did, there is that crossfire profiles utility out there to force it.
Pay twice the money get twice the frame rate? What, you think this is vintage 1999?
I have played: COD4, COD WaW, Burnout Paradise, Crysis SP Demo, (no comments), GTA IV, BF2, and probably a couple others I can't think of. Other than obviously Crysis demo and to some degree GTA IV, I spend 99% of my time playing online.
Never once did I experience any fps increase because of the board swap. Never did I realize that I can now up my AA to 8x, or any other setting for that matter, after changing boards. All this while playing 1920x1200 all the time.
Do you want to know what upgrades I made where I about crap myself cause of such a noticeable difference in fps of my game play? Three times:
First moved from 1950 Pro to 4870x2 (was trying to play at 1920x1200)
Then moved from E6420 to Q9400
Lastly moved to Vista x64 from XP x86 for primary OS with 4gb memory for both
Those three are the only times that I was able to increase detail level because I saw a noticeable increase in fps during game play.
The video card is obvious.
The processor even when both were oc to 3.2ghz, the quad allowed me to play all COD4 mp with 8xAA without any low dips in the frame rate because of shooting. After the quad: with vsync on, all in game settings turned up, and using Cat for 8XAA/16xAF my fps never moved from 60. Before with the dual they would dip to low 30s on Creek and Overgrown when shooting someone.
The x64 OS allowed COD WaW and GTA IV to smooth out because they started using more memory. WaW started using ~800mb more (~2.3gb total) and GTA IV increased ~500mb.
This is why I question those who saw your fine with a dual over a quad and wonder myself what change I would see with 8gb of memory over the 4 I have. Right now I can use up 2gb just scrolling through the internet with the sidebars (Everest & a cooler gpu one that uses RT use up the most) that are up on Vista. Win 7 is much better, but by launch I'm sure it won't be far behind even though it will do a better job.
I'll just tell you right now I don't care too much about benchmarks cause you can't play them. I did do Vantage before (win 7 x64) and after the board swap, the scores are exactly the same and even are my 3dmark scores. Given what I've read, I've been thinking about putting my tuner card into the other 16x slot as it should force 8x/8x just to see if there was something I've missed. The hardest thing I had trouble finding when I saw looking at p45 vs x48: Everyone had the benchmarks to prove something, but where are all the people who played games? I ran across 2 that said get the p45 and now I'm making a 3rd that I know of that will say the same thing.