Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 36
  1. #1
    Member AngelfireUk83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    England

    AMD Are Getting Better Overall

    If you've been reading over the last 2 days on news on AMD you'll have to ask how much stuff left is there to announce with confirmation of Shanghi (see current thread for news http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=584699).

    AMD have plans to release 7 new cores and 4 new platforms http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...-amd-platforms and now there's news of AMD putting STREAM everwhere (don't know what that is until I read this) http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...eam-everywhere

    And finally AMD have been wining marketshare in the Graphics market http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...rket-share-amd it's about time things started looking up I am on the wait till January for a Shanghi now plus saving more means I can get a nice motherboard too. What was once describes as a falling company a year ago things are different and they've done a great turn around.

    I am just hoping the benches to Shanghi and there new chips and platforms are good enough to confirm there moving up also there's no late launch in fact in front of shedule so there's a bonus.
    OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit SP1
    Board: Gigabyte Z68AP-D3 Rev.1 F8
    CPU: INTEL i7 2600k 3.40ghz (Stock)
    RAM: Crucial Ballistix Elite 8GB 1866mhz DDR3 (1600mhz@1.60v)
    OS Storage: Crucial 128GB M4 SSD (FW 040H)
    Spare Storage: WD 1TB Blue 7,200rpm, Hitachi 1TB 7,200rpm (Back-Up HDD)
    GPU/Audio: HIS 7850 2GB GDDR5 PCI-E Card (OC: 920/1270)
    PSU: OCZ Fatality 750w Modular PSU
    Optical: LG GH24NS90 24x DVD-RW

  2. #2
    well i've read that the shanghi is great for Virtualization. that should be good news I hope for AMD. I am pushing my boss for funds to fillout our blade chassis as I move most of our servers to the virtual world. and it is the same for alot of other companies. I also hope they dont stick to their current graphics adapters too long. they need to keep pumping out the technology to stay ahead.
    Workstation - Windows 7 x64
    AMD 1055T
    Server - ESXi 5.0
    INTEL E5-2603

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Hate to be OT, but what are the main benefits of vitualization?

    As I can see it if you use one OS and applications for that one OS there is no need for virtualization on desktop.

    Is it much different for servers? Like can multiple users have multiple OSes with multiple applications on a server? I thought this was done on the client side..


    Back on topic...

    Now all AMD needs (at least on the graphics side) is more Linux CCC features and better OpenGL performance. If they can roll that all out in the 8.12 driver

    package I will be as happy as a fat kid with chocolate cake.
    Last edited by Firestrider; 11-14-08 at 08:42 AM.

    Processor - Intel Core i7 860 Motherboard - Intel DP55WB Video - AMD Radeon HD 5750 Memory - 4x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600 Storage - Intel X25-V, Samsung HD103SJ
    Optical - Samsung SH-S203B Power - Corsair CX400 Speakers - Polk Monitor 40/60, BIC F12 Audio - ASUS Xonar DG, Denon AVR 391 Network - Intel 82578DC, Linksys WRT400N
    Case - Corsair Carbide 300R Cooling - Corsair H100 Operating System - Windows 7 x64 Display - Dell E248WFP, Samsung LN46C630 Keyboard/Mouse - Dell Bluetooth Wireless
    Misc - Apple TV 2, Apple iPad 2, Apple iPhone 4S

  4. #4
    Member Particle's Avatar
    10 Year Badge
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Parsons, KS
    The big pull toward virtualization for our company at least is the ability to:
    1) Consolidate multiple machines into one server. This lets us focus on one machine's storage subsystem's capacity and reliability, get rid of extra hardare, use less power, manage more easily, etc.
    2) Virtualize network shared resources to where network shares really just go over loopback instead of across the network. This gets rid of temporary connectivity problems and latency issues.
    3) Eliminate many sources for downtime via hardware failure. Outside of the VM host, there is no hardware to service or fail. Everything is virtual.
    4) Decrease licensing costs. Windows Server Enterprise allows you to use up to five copies of itself per copy as the OS in virtual machines. Datacenter edition allows for unlimited. Buy one copy and have 30 VMs if you so choose...legally.

    Essentially, we get more for less. It's faster, it's easier to maintain, it's cheaper, and it is more reliable.
    Why does every thread boil down to a freaking AMD vs. Intel bashfest?

  5. #5
    Cool!

    Consolidation is the main reason for getting one 4x board running at 350watts vs two 2x rigs pulling 250watts a-piece.

    Check out the Conesus (a lake) for the netbook/mini lappy.
    http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...10474&Itemid=1
    Main Rigs
    Developement -Phen2 1090T on Asus 870
    Fun -Callisto 555BE, Asus 990FX Sabortooth,ATI HD3870
    CDs, Labels, Printing etc- 5000BBE, GA790FX, Wintec 800 4G.HD2600XT
    Rendering Server- 4x Barcelona 8347s. Tyan S4980 Quad, 16G (2G Kingston per socket).
    Folding, Testing- Vista, Regor 265 X2 on Asus 880,
    dead- Phen2-940
    AM2, DFI790FX-M2R,Corsair-PC6400 CL4
    Theme Park Builder 3D The Game- Build-em and Ride-em.

  6. #6
    Member Shiggity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    I'm super excited for this -

    Also in 2011, AMD plans to introduce another platform with the codename Sabine. Sabine will use what AMD calls an accelerated processing unit or APU going by the codename Llano. APU is AMD speak for a CPU and a graphics processor on one piece of silicon. AMD expects Sabine to bring significant power savings to notebook computers.
    http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=13440

    AMD / ATI's expertise in the CPU and GPU area will surely let them do some cool things with that chip.

    AMD's new roadmap was so huge, looks very exciting. They are bringing out new things in every area in the next 1-3 years and getting into new markets as well. GJ AMD


    Edit - Is it just me or is AMD 100x better at naming things than Intel as well?
    Last edited by Shiggity; 11-14-08 at 04:00 PM.
    CPU - E6750 @ 3.4GHz | 425x8 | 1.41V | Zalman CNPS9500 | Lapped
    Mobo - Abit P35 Pro | Bios v14
    Ram - 2x1GB G.Skill F2-6400CL5D-2GBNQ | 850 | 5-5-5-15 | 1.85V
    GPU - PNY 8800GT | 700c, 1850s, 900m | HR-03GT
    HD - 150GB raptor ADFD | Seagate 7200.7 160GB | 2x WD 640GB
    PSU - OCZ GameXSteam 700W


  7. #7
    I once overclocked an Intel
    in a nightmare and
    it was HORRIBLE Senior



    OCF's Plaything
    Dolk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis MO
    Author Profile Benching Profile
    I'm surprised people are not noticing this, but this is it. These new roadmaps are amazing. The technology that will be made by AMD in the coming future will surely be some of the best stuff we have ever seen. But, the Deneb and Shanghai is the only thing that will allow this roadmap to become true. And even if Deneb and Shanghai make a success and up the profits, AMD will be putting everything on the line for the next 3 years.

    What I can see is that they will be battling every front on the CPU and GPU side. AMD will be competing with Nvidia, and Intel at the same time. Doing price wars and bench wars. If AMD can not stay on top of these, then the roadmap will fail.

    All this news about how AMD is going to be doing so great is just stories to me right now, and I consider myself a devoted fan. But I have to look at the truth. The truth is AMD still sits behind Intel and is just even with Nvidia right now. Even with the bad economy, this will still be a huge challenge for AMD.

    And yes, AMD names their CPUs after cooler things. Unlike Nehalem.
    (╯v)╯︵ ┻━┻
    currently has .2738428927348 internets
    create your own rules to find the answer
    be proud of the pink stars
    Earthdog: New codename for SB for extreme overclockers... BLEH.



  8. #8
    Member Leonardo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Eagle River, Alaska
    Folding Profile Heatware Profile
    But, the Deneb and Shanghai is the only thing that will allow this roadmap to become true.
    The foundation. It is that. But it's a much more promising foundation than anything else we've seen in the last two, nearly three years! Also, 32nm is not that far off. Retooling of at least one of the Dresden plants is not far off. This is something real this time. No, it may revolutionize that industry and bring rich profits to AMD, but to , it leads me to believe AMD IS back in the game. I think it's more than talk this time.

    And even if Deneb and Shanghai make a success and up the profits, AMD will be putting everything on the line for the next 3 years.
    Yeah, but at least this go round, they have something solid and competitive to put on that line.
    1. Supermicro H8QGi+-F, 4 X AMD Opteron 6172, Seasonic M12D 850, 32GB Ballilstix 1600, 4 X Cooler Master Hyper 212+ "Musky mod", Cooler Master HAF X modified, Ubuntu;
    2. Supermicro H8QGi+-F, 4 X AMD Opteron 6174, Corsair AX850, 32GB G.Skill; 4 X Cooler Master Hyper 212+ "Musky mod", Cooler Master HAF 932 modified, Ubuntu;
    3. Supermicro H8QGL-iF, 2 X Opteron 6176 + 2 X 6174, 64GB G.Skill DDR3 1600, Enermax Revolution 85+ 950W, 4 X Cooler Master Hyper 212+ "Musky mod", Rocketfish/Lian Li modified, Ubuntu;
    4. Supermicro H8QGi+F, 4 X AMD Opteron 6174, Corsair AX750, 32GB G.Skill DDR3 1333, 4 X Cooler Master Hyper 212+, custom wood/metal platform, Linux

  9. #9
    Member Kuroimaho's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Japan, Tokyo, Ueno.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dolk View Post
    I'm surprised people are not noticing this, but this is it. These new roadmaps are amazing.
    Their roadmaps were always amazing, until you dust of the latest one and check what should be out by now, like Kuma H1 08, Deneb FX, Deneb and Propus H2 08 Link.
    I am sure some people who were around the Barcelona launch remember the smokes and mirror operation to save their stock from Barcs results.
    Bulldozer and SSE5 might ring some bells, oh look those should be out in a few months as well. LINK

    Some people fell for it. Link
    Quote Originally Posted by savageseb
    Along the Bulldozer CPUs and Sandtiger with SSE5. it will rip Nehalem apart. i give Nehalem no more than 3-4 months of shining if it comes out at the right time.
    If I take a look at those roadmaps, I see some new promises and that Bulldozer gets pushed back 2 years when the samples should be out.

    So with the roadmap update AMD's ondie gpu comes later than Intel's and SSE5 comes later than AVX as well which turns these attacks on Intel into responses from Intel's latest tech and possibly makes SSE5 worth as much as SSE4a.
    How is all this good news ?

    The best news these days didn't come from AMD themselves but from Intel, they pushed back basically everything a full quarter so all they have till Q3-Q4 is the old C2D and a luxury platform, which gives AMD an opportunity.
    Zalman Zmachine GT1000
    I7920 4G Apogee GTZ I7, Bloodrage, 6GB, Intel X25-V, 2X WD3000GLFS R0, Hitachi 7K3 X4 R5, 580 GTX, IIYAMA 27", Corsair HX750, Steelseries 7G, XAI, SX


    Zalman TNN300
    Q6600 3.4G, Asus P5E-VM, 2GB, WD3000GLFS, 2x501LJ, Apple 23"


    Zalman TNN500
    Phenom 2 550 X4 3.5G, GA-MA790FX-UD5P, TWIN2X4096-6400C4DHX,Tesla C1060, WD3000GLFS 3x1TB WD, Apple 30".

  10. #10
    I once overclocked an Intel
    in a nightmare and
    it was HORRIBLE Senior



    OCF's Plaything
    Dolk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    St. Louis MO
    Author Profile Benching Profile
    You can't blame AMD for pushing back CPUs. They only have 2 fab plants, and a third one coming in 2011. Now I am not saying I know all about the processor industry, but I bet it would be really hard for a company like AMD to produce, test, and design several different types of CPUs all at once. Currently they make the Phenom and Phenom II, which both of these have 2 different types of CPUs. Then there is the X2, and Opteron, and Laptop designed CPUs. That is 6 CPUs at once. If AMD was to continue and create these other CPUs, that have different features like SSE5, they would be going out of business more so then they are right now. I remember AMD trying to do this last year, and the year before. It all most put them out of business. They stick to what they are good at, keep the market in their favor, and then later down the line, try and create CPUs that are designed for a specific audience.
    (╯v)╯︵ ┻━┻
    currently has .2738428927348 internets
    create your own rules to find the answer
    be proud of the pink stars
    Earthdog: New codename for SB for extreme overclockers... BLEH.



  11. #11
    "The Expert" Archer0915's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    East Carolina University Grad School
    Author Profile Benching Profile Heatware Profile
    Well actually you can put some of the blame on AMD but the bulk goes on overenthusiastic
    fanboys (Amd and Intel). Poor operations management, engineers looking forward too optimistically and giving unrealistic estimates (you can build a virtual machine on paper but to put it on silicon can be a hassle) and stockholders putting too much pressure on the cooperation without having an understanding of the fundamentals of processor design and production. As to the AMD fanboys same problem not having an understanding of the fundamentals of processor design and production. For the Intel fanboys they just egg it on and give an outsider false impressions about amd products.

    EDIT: The roadmaps are a very best case scenario assuming perfect silicon and no engineering delays HMMMMM?? Guess the bulk of the blame goes to AMD management and stock holders.
    People that buy OEM systems think Linux was a Charlie Brown character, a registry is something you see at target to buy shower gifts, RAM is a Dodge truck and a hard drive is DC at rush hour.
    Current Active Fleet:
    Daily Driver i7 3740QM T530
    Work Rig/networked backup - i7 4770K@4.4, 24GB Ram, 7850 GFX Bedroom PC - i7 870 @ 3.4, 16GB Ram, 6670 GFX
    Home School PC (kids) SB Celery @1.6, 4GB Ram, On Chip GFX Living Room HTPC - E-450@1.9 GHz, 4GB Ram
    Game Rig (kids)- 3570K@4.7, 12GB Ram, 465GTX + 9800GT (PhysX) using intel SRT
    Test Bed - In flux

  12. #12
    Member Kuroimaho's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Japan, Tokyo, Ueno.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dolk View Post
    You can't blame AMD for pushing back CPUs. They only have 2 fab plants, and a third one coming in 2011.
    Why not ? Weren't they the ones who made those slides ? A quarter or two late wouldn't be a big deal, things happen, but 2 years. They knew that deadline can not be held still they published it.
    My intention was to remind people how much their Roadmaps worth.
    By the way what does their fabs have to do with processor design ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dolk View Post
    Now I am not saying I know all about the processor industry, but I bet it would be really hard for a company like AMD to produce, test, and design several different types of CPUs all at once.
    Weren't they aware of that a year ago ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dolk View Post
    Currently they make the Phenom and Phenom II, which both of these have 2 different types of CPUs. Then there is the X2, and Opteron, and Laptop designed CPUs. That is 6 CPUs at once.
    I would recommend to read a bit about cpu architectures, to find out what is the difference between an Opteron and a Phenom.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dolk View Post
    If AMD was to continue and create these other CPUs, that have different features like SSE5, they would be going out of business more so then they are right now.
    I am complaining for a while for the lack of Kuma but they still make the bloody Brisbanes instead, does this mean they are trying to go out of business ?
    Zalman Zmachine GT1000
    I7920 4G Apogee GTZ I7, Bloodrage, 6GB, Intel X25-V, 2X WD3000GLFS R0, Hitachi 7K3 X4 R5, 580 GTX, IIYAMA 27", Corsair HX750, Steelseries 7G, XAI, SX


    Zalman TNN300
    Q6600 3.4G, Asus P5E-VM, 2GB, WD3000GLFS, 2x501LJ, Apple 23"


    Zalman TNN500
    Phenom 2 550 X4 3.5G, GA-MA790FX-UD5P, TWIN2X4096-6400C4DHX,Tesla C1060, WD3000GLFS 3x1TB WD, Apple 30".

  13. #13
    "The Expert" Archer0915's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    East Carolina University Grad School
    Author Profile Benching Profile Heatware Profile
    Kuroimaho you are on the right track the road maps are partly posted to hope for blind investment "look what we are going to do buy our stock". The problem with this is that too many ppl have been burned by speculation in the past. If however I do believe that if AMD published more realistic road maps and could actually beat them they might build investor confidence. READ: AMD needs to fire the PR ppl and management needs to look to the past dev times and redesign the system they use to make projections.

    BTW:I have seen up close how this crap goes down wish I could talk about it.
    Last edited by Archer0915; 11-21-08 at 10:06 AM.
    People that buy OEM systems think Linux was a Charlie Brown character, a registry is something you see at target to buy shower gifts, RAM is a Dodge truck and a hard drive is DC at rush hour.
    Current Active Fleet:
    Daily Driver i7 3740QM T530
    Work Rig/networked backup - i7 4770K@4.4, 24GB Ram, 7850 GFX Bedroom PC - i7 870 @ 3.4, 16GB Ram, 6670 GFX
    Home School PC (kids) SB Celery @1.6, 4GB Ram, On Chip GFX Living Room HTPC - E-450@1.9 GHz, 4GB Ram
    Game Rig (kids)- 3570K@4.7, 12GB Ram, 465GTX + 9800GT (PhysX) using intel SRT
    Test Bed - In flux

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Kuroimaho View Post
    Why not ? Weren't they the ones who made those slides ? A quarter or two late wouldn't be a big deal, things happen, but 2 years. They knew that deadline can not be held still they published it.
    My intention was to remind people how much their Roadmaps worth.
    By the way what does their fabs have to do with processor design ?
    I believe this is in reference to "where are the FX and X2 on Barcelona cores" and it does relate to FAB as having the bandwidth to run extra lines.

    FX is enthusiast level which right now is not an AMD position for K10.
    K10-X2 would make more sense to have released but considering tooling time is made more sense to just hold out for 45nm. 45nm should be more profitable providided we stop the world economic slide down the bung hole.
    Main Rigs
    Developement -Phen2 1090T on Asus 870
    Fun -Callisto 555BE, Asus 990FX Sabortooth,ATI HD3870
    CDs, Labels, Printing etc- 5000BBE, GA790FX, Wintec 800 4G.HD2600XT
    Rendering Server- 4x Barcelona 8347s. Tyan S4980 Quad, 16G (2G Kingston per socket).
    Folding, Testing- Vista, Regor 265 X2 on Asus 880,
    dead- Phen2-940
    AM2, DFI790FX-M2R,Corsair-PC6400 CL4
    Theme Park Builder 3D The Game- Build-em and Ride-em.

  15. #15
    Member >HyperlogiK<'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sword Base
    It would be a sad irony if the recession killed AMD just as they obtained the captal to become competitive again.
    The Last Gonzo of Scotland.
    Core i7 950 @ 4Ghz, Gigabyte x58-USB3, Radeon 6870 CF, Xonar D2X, 12GB Kingston HyperX 1600, Bigfoot 2100, Agility 3 120GB, 3x 2TB Spinpoint F4, Corsair HX1000w, Cambridge Audio A500 and Acoustic Research speakers (Main PC)
    Alienware M11x, C2D SU 7300, Geforce 335M, Corsair Force 40GB (Laptop)
    Opteron 175, DFI Lanparty NF4 Ultra D, Radeon x850 XT PE, 4GB BH-5, OCZ Petrol 64GB, X-Fi Xtreme Music, 2x TerraTec PHASE 22, Enermax Liberty ELT500, Yamaha A-S300 and Mordaunt Short Aviano speakers (Music PC)
    Pentium D 920, Gigabyte 965P-S3, Geforce 210, 2GB Elpida DDR2, TerraTec PHASE 22, ASUS DVB-T (HTPC)
    Dual P3 866Mhz, Intel 440LX Board, 1.8GB PC133Mhz, 2x Voodoo 2 12MB, Turtle Beach FIJI (Retro Gaming Machine)

    Heatware

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Wouldn't AMD not releasing Kumas dual cores a testament on how good their yield rates are? I mean aren't they just Phenom X4s with two core-lines cut?

    If AMD did a MCM like Intel wouldn't K10 be much more profitable? IMO they should have given their financial situation and how HyperTransport is better than FSB.

    Looking into the future.. AMD is going to have a hard time with AVX competing with SSE5, a later incarnation of Nehalem with integrated GPU (granted its Intel's GPU) competing with Fusion, and Larrabee competing with Radeon.

    Processor - Intel Core i7 860 Motherboard - Intel DP55WB Video - AMD Radeon HD 5750 Memory - 4x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600 Storage - Intel X25-V, Samsung HD103SJ
    Optical - Samsung SH-S203B Power - Corsair CX400 Speakers - Polk Monitor 40/60, BIC F12 Audio - ASUS Xonar DG, Denon AVR 391 Network - Intel 82578DC, Linksys WRT400N
    Case - Corsair Carbide 300R Cooling - Corsair H100 Operating System - Windows 7 x64 Display - Dell E248WFP, Samsung LN46C630 Keyboard/Mouse - Dell Bluetooth Wireless
    Misc - Apple TV 2, Apple iPad 2, Apple iPhone 4S

  17. #17
    "The Expert" Archer0915's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    East Carolina University Grad School
    Author Profile Benching Profile Heatware Profile
    I read early specs on Larrabee and it will be no powerhouse for the aftermarket but it looks like a good board based solution.
    People that buy OEM systems think Linux was a Charlie Brown character, a registry is something you see at target to buy shower gifts, RAM is a Dodge truck and a hard drive is DC at rush hour.
    Current Active Fleet:
    Daily Driver i7 3740QM T530
    Work Rig/networked backup - i7 4770K@4.4, 24GB Ram, 7850 GFX Bedroom PC - i7 870 @ 3.4, 16GB Ram, 6670 GFX
    Home School PC (kids) SB Celery @1.6, 4GB Ram, On Chip GFX Living Room HTPC - E-450@1.9 GHz, 4GB Ram
    Game Rig (kids)- 3570K@4.7, 12GB Ram, 465GTX + 9800GT (PhysX) using intel SRT
    Test Bed - In flux

  18. #18
    mjw21a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Australia, Brisbane
    I see my 5th AMD system on the horizon..... Damn, now I've surpassed the number of Intel systems I've had.....
    CPU & HSF: AMD FX-8120 & Noctua NH-D14
    Mobo: Asus M5A97-EVO
    RAM: 16GB (4Gx4) DDR3 2133 G.Skill RipjawZ F3-17000CL11Q-16GBZL
    Storage: 1x 120GB OCZ Vertex II SSD, 1x 250GB Samsung 830 SSD, 1x 1.5TB Samsung Silencer Series HDD
    GFX: 4GB Gigabyte ATI R9 270X OC Edition + Yamakasi Catleap Q270 SE 27" IPS LED LCD
    Teamspeak Audio: SMSL SD-793II DAC, Sennheiser CX270 Earbuds + BM800 Condenser Microphone
    Amp/Speakers: SMSL SA-50 T-Amp, Polk Audio TSi500 Bookshelf Speakers
    Case & Lighting: Silverstone Temjin TJ04-E w/ Side Window + Red CCFL's
    PSU: 550W Antec EarthWatts Platinum

  19. #19
    Member >HyperlogiK<'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sword Base
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestrider View Post
    If AMD did a MCM like Intel wouldn't K10 be much more profitable? IMO they should have given their financial situation and how HyperTransport is better than FSB.
    Dirk Meyer himself said that a while before he became CEO.
    The Last Gonzo of Scotland.
    Core i7 950 @ 4Ghz, Gigabyte x58-USB3, Radeon 6870 CF, Xonar D2X, 12GB Kingston HyperX 1600, Bigfoot 2100, Agility 3 120GB, 3x 2TB Spinpoint F4, Corsair HX1000w, Cambridge Audio A500 and Acoustic Research speakers (Main PC)
    Alienware M11x, C2D SU 7300, Geforce 335M, Corsair Force 40GB (Laptop)
    Opteron 175, DFI Lanparty NF4 Ultra D, Radeon x850 XT PE, 4GB BH-5, OCZ Petrol 64GB, X-Fi Xtreme Music, 2x TerraTec PHASE 22, Enermax Liberty ELT500, Yamaha A-S300 and Mordaunt Short Aviano speakers (Music PC)
    Pentium D 920, Gigabyte 965P-S3, Geforce 210, 2GB Elpida DDR2, TerraTec PHASE 22, ASUS DVB-T (HTPC)
    Dual P3 866Mhz, Intel 440LX Board, 1.8GB PC133Mhz, 2x Voodoo 2 12MB, Turtle Beach FIJI (Retro Gaming Machine)

    Heatware

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestrider View Post
    Hate to be OT, but what are the main benefits of vitualization?

    As I can see it if you use one OS and applications for that one OS there is no need for virtualization on desktop.

    Is it much different for servers? Like can multiple users have multiple OSes with multiple applications on a server? I thought this was done on the client side..


    Back on topic...

    Now all AMD needs (at least on the graphics side) is more Linux CCC features and better OpenGL performance. If they can roll that all out in the 8.12 driver

    package I will be as happy as a fat kid with chocolate cake.
    I am a web developer and database administrator. VMWare Server is one of the most used tools on my workstation(s). I can run Windows 2008 x64, 2008 x86, Debian Etch and CentOS 5.2 on the VM's of my workstation with my code.

    I might need/want a tool that is only available in Linux so i can also put Ubuntu as a VM and work on it from a VNC client. I usually Remote Desktop into a XP SP3 32bit VM at home when I work on my home workstation because the VPN client for my job is Cisco and doesn't support Vista 64, XP 64 or Ubuntu 64 which I run exclusively at home.

    That is the power of VM on the desktop for me.
    Asus M3N-HT Deluxe/HDMI * PII x6 1075 * Corsair H50 * 4x OCZ XTC 2GB * 2 x eVGA GTX260 216* 4 x WB 500GB RE4 Raid10 * Lite-On 20x DVD-R SATA * Antec P182 v3 * Corsair CMPSU-750TX PSU
    GIGABYTE GA-M68MT-S2P * PII 810 * PII 4 pipe * Crucial Ballistix DDR3 1600 * Saphire 2600XT * WD 160g 8mb sata* Toshiba 16x DVD-Rom * EMachines 6405 case * Antec 450 Basiq
    Foxconn A7GM-S * PII 940 * Corsair H50 * G.Skill 4G DDR2 800 * WD 250g 16mb 7.2 * Lite-On 16x DVD-ROM/CD-R * Antec P180 Mini * OCZ StealthXStream 600

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •