- Joined
- Jun 11, 2008
- Location
- San Diego, CA
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-295,2107.html
Now things are going to get interesting.
The GTX 295 is clearly faster than the 4870x2 in the games they tested. And in all honesty, Nvidia is right about the titles they selected. Those are the games people are playing right now. Dead Space, Call of Duty: World at War, Fallout 3, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead. Tomshardware and Anandtech's old bench line up was a little TOO outdated.
Now here's the big question:
ATI knew Nvidia would try to respond with more than just a price drop and a refresh of the 260 (Core 216). They knew Nvidia would pull out the big guns at some point. So what is ATI's plan?
1) The 4870 GPU is way cheaper than the G200 GPU, but GDDR5 is expensive and not as available. Do they cut the price on the 4870x2 by $50-100 and release something a little more challenging at the high end? 4970 maybe? (Die shrink, better yield?)
2) Do they simply cut prices and throw the 4850x2 out from more board manufacturers and focus on driver implementation? I wouldn't be surprised to see it.
Now things are going to get interesting.
The GTX 295 is clearly faster than the 4870x2 in the games they tested. And in all honesty, Nvidia is right about the titles they selected. Those are the games people are playing right now. Dead Space, Call of Duty: World at War, Fallout 3, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead. Tomshardware and Anandtech's old bench line up was a little TOO outdated.
Now here's the big question:
ATI knew Nvidia would try to respond with more than just a price drop and a refresh of the 260 (Core 216). They knew Nvidia would pull out the big guns at some point. So what is ATI's plan?
1) The 4870 GPU is way cheaper than the G200 GPU, but GDDR5 is expensive and not as available. Do they cut the price on the 4870x2 by $50-100 and release something a little more challenging at the high end? 4970 maybe? (Die shrink, better yield?)
2) Do they simply cut prices and throw the 4850x2 out from more board manufacturers and focus on driver implementation? I wouldn't be surprised to see it.