Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21
  1. #1

    What is the fastest OC ever?!?

    What is the fastest OC ever?

    1. EVER
    2. Here at OCforums

  2. #2
    Researches Meritless
    LIES for the Front
    Page and Super Mutterator

    Overclockers.com Editor
    First Responders

    EarthDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Stuck in Maryland...
    Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile

    "We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon

  3. #3
    P4... uhh Phenom 4? what is that? lol, me=noob!

  4. #4
    Pentium 4

  5. #5
    oh, roflcopter! I was like, "P4? I must get myself some of this magical P4!"

  6. #6
    Member Dapman02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Overland Park, KS
    Quote Originally Posted by pinkles View Post
    P4... uhh Phenom 4? what is that? lol, me=noob!
    Thanks.....now I feel old

    (I'm 21)
    Desktop: Return of Deneb
    Processor: AMD Phenom II 955 @ 4.2Ghz
    Cooling: TRUE Push/Pull
    GPU: Visiontek 5850 Core 875Mhz/1175mhz memory
    Motherboard: MSI 880G-E45
    Case: CM Storm Enforcer
    RAM: 2x2gb Samsung generic
    HDD: Samsung 500GB 5400RPM
    OS: Windows 7 64-bit
    Christian Overclocker

  7. #7
    hehe, you're sooo old

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Check out www.ripping.org

    Lots of info there.

  9. #9
    Senior Member


    Bobnova's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Humboldt
    Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile Rosetta Profile
    8192mhz on a P4, a 630 or 631 i think.

    Can't beat netburst for mhz.
    "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." -- Einstein (maybe)

    Thinking about an Asus motherboard? Think again.

    How to check your PSU with a multimeter.

    17bXw5t51rEBXGavJFMJsC8g7HQgThUGc7

  10. #10
    Researches Meritless
    LIES for the Front
    Page and Super Mutterator

    Overclockers.com Editor
    First Responders

    EarthDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Stuck in Maryland...
    Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile
    8180Mhz on a 641 according to hwbot (2nd post link).

    "We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon

  11. #11
    Senior Member


    Bobnova's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Humboldt
    Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile Rosetta Profile
    I was remarkably close for trying to remember from months ago :P
    "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." -- Einstein (maybe)

    Thinking about an Asus motherboard? Think again.

    How to check your PSU with a multimeter.

    17bXw5t51rEBXGavJFMJsC8g7HQgThUGc7

  12. #12
    Member Mjolnir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by pinkles View Post
    P4... uhh Phenom 4? what is that? lol, me=noob!
    LOL we're not that old! Thats hilarious dude. My god...

    Well it depends what you think about as the fastest OC... for pure clock speed it'd be an older p4 or whatev, but depends how you look at the fastest OC. (where multi-cores stack). So a quad at 4000 mhz is 16000 mhz.. I suppose. If you'd think about it that way lol. *shrug*
    \m/ OverClockers mATX L33T Club \m/
    Motherboard - Asus Z87i Pro
    CPU - Pentium G3258 Unlocked, 4.2ghz @ 1.2v + Noctua U9B-SE2
    RAM - 16GB G Skill Ares 1866CL10
    GPU - EVGA GTX 750 Ti
    Storage - Samsung 840 Pro 256GB + 960Gb Crucial SSD
    Case - Ncase(Lian Li) M1
    PSU - Silverstone SFX 450W Gold Modular
    OS - Windows 8.1
    Peripherals - Leopold FC700R Graphite Brown MX + G700s
    Screen(s) - Dell U2711
    Audio - Audioengine 5+ + Audioengine D1 + Wharfdale SW150 /w Shure SRH 1840 Headphones

  13. #13
    Ah, yeah, that makes sense. Beacause you can OC the single core chips higher because they don't generate as much heat at the multi cores... right?

  14. #14
    Researches Meritless
    LIES for the Front
    Page and Super Mutterator

    Overclockers.com Editor
    First Responders

    EarthDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Stuck in Maryland...
    Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile
    Quote Originally Posted by Mjolnir View Post
    So a quad at 4000 mhz is 16000 mhz.. I suppose. If you'd think about it that way lol. *shrug*
    Only ebay sellers and dolts think of it that way.

    "We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon

  15. #15
    Member Mjolnir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by EarthDog View Post
    Only ebay sellers and dolts think of it that way.
    lol yup. just making a point lol. note the 'if youd think about it that way' lol.

    Hopefully some new chip coming out can beat out the record... would be interesting to see.
    \m/ OverClockers mATX L33T Club \m/
    Motherboard - Asus Z87i Pro
    CPU - Pentium G3258 Unlocked, 4.2ghz @ 1.2v + Noctua U9B-SE2
    RAM - 16GB G Skill Ares 1866CL10
    GPU - EVGA GTX 750 Ti
    Storage - Samsung 840 Pro 256GB + 960Gb Crucial SSD
    Case - Ncase(Lian Li) M1
    PSU - Silverstone SFX 450W Gold Modular
    OS - Windows 8.1
    Peripherals - Leopold FC700R Graphite Brown MX + G700s
    Screen(s) - Dell U2711
    Audio - Audioengine 5+ + Audioengine D1 + Wharfdale SW150 /w Shure SRH 1840 Headphones

  16. #16
    d20 in a jacket

    ChanceCoats123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Illinois
    Benching Profile Heatware Profile
    Quote Originally Posted by pinkles View Post
    Ah, yeah, that makes sense. Beacause you can OC the single core chips higher because they don't generate as much heat at the multi cores... right?
    Well, the P4's were on a much larger process than today's processors are so that along with the lower transistor count means more oc' potential. Amd is getting close with their quad cores though! Broke 7ghz on a retail 45nanometer quad!
    Ed - "Aight it's pulling down... Thing is really tuned for LN2 though."
    This is the team you are looking for...
    I accept Bitcoins!

  17. #17
    Member Mjolnir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by ChanceCoats123 View Post
    Well, the P4's were on a much larger process than today's processors are so that along with the lower transistor count means more oc' potential. Amd is getting close with their quad cores though! Broke 7ghz on a retail 45nanometer quad!
    What about disabling the other 3 cores and OC'ing only the one? wouldn't this yield a higher gain? Or is that only theoretical; and in practice its still limited?
    \m/ OverClockers mATX L33T Club \m/
    Motherboard - Asus Z87i Pro
    CPU - Pentium G3258 Unlocked, 4.2ghz @ 1.2v + Noctua U9B-SE2
    RAM - 16GB G Skill Ares 1866CL10
    GPU - EVGA GTX 750 Ti
    Storage - Samsung 840 Pro 256GB + 960Gb Crucial SSD
    Case - Ncase(Lian Li) M1
    PSU - Silverstone SFX 450W Gold Modular
    OS - Windows 8.1
    Peripherals - Leopold FC700R Graphite Brown MX + G700s
    Screen(s) - Dell U2711
    Audio - Audioengine 5+ + Audioengine D1 + Wharfdale SW150 /w Shure SRH 1840 Headphones

  18. #18
    d20 in a jacket

    ChanceCoats123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Illinois
    Benching Profile Heatware Profile
    Well, in theory it could work, but the fact remains that the process shrink means there are more transistors to actuate meaning it is harder in the end to achieve those higher speeds.
    Ed - "Aight it's pulling down... Thing is really tuned for LN2 though."
    This is the team you are looking for...
    I accept Bitcoins!

  19. #19
    GrimX9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA


    Hmmm, looks like they don't know how to take screenshots. I'm guessing its actually not valid?
    Phenom II X2 3.9Ghz||G.SKILL 1066 4GB||M4A78+||9800GT||WD Black 640GB 7200RPM||OCZ StealthXStream 700W||Dark Knight CPU cooler

    "Welcome. Welcome, to City 17." - Robert Culp, August 16, 1930 - March 24, 2010

  20. #20
    Registered
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    http://www.chotocheeta.com/2009/01/2...-world-record/
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4jkdfalnYE
    thats the highest Quad core at 6.5 which was stable but they used like... a tank of LN2 and Liquid Helium to go below 200 celcius... and they played games fine...

    http://www.techpowerup.com/index.php?98692
    I guess these was 7.0ghz I didn't know about


    Pentium 4 8ghz, actual SS that looks like a SS...
    http://www.nordichardware.com/news,5505.html

    and 8.1ghz :O
    http://www.nordichardware.com/news,6423.html



    And a failture trying to break 8.2ghz

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcdzuUhtB-Q

    My ass, they didn't even boot cuss they spilled ln2.
    Last edited by IsuckAtThis; 08-18-09 at 12:10 AM.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •