Results 1 to 6 of 6
10-18-09, 12:58 PM #1
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
3 Different Programs, 3 Different CPU Temps
So, what Program is the most accurate when it comes to monitoring temps?
Speedfan, CoreTemp and RealTemp all return completely different values
Temps at Idle:
15-18C < Clearly Wrong as this is only 1C above Ambient.
So, what one am I supposed to believe?
10-18-09, 01:42 PM #2
I use Coretemp and HWMonitor.. also check the hardware monitor in your BIOS and see what it displays for temps and voltages. One of those programs should be closer to the value from BIOS.Phenom II X6 1075T Thuban @ 3920Mhz 14x280
TRUE Black Rev. C - Shin-Etsu X23-7783D - Cougar CF-D1 Reds in push/pull
ASUS Crosshair IV Formula AM3 890FX NB@2799Mhz HT@2240Mhz
G.Skill RipjawsX 8GB DDR3 @ 1866Mhz 9-10-9-28-1T
ASUS 7970 3GB @ 1000/1450
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB SATAIII - Win 7 Ultimate x64
2x WD 640GB Caviar Blue / 2x WD 750GB Caviar Black
PC P&C 750W Silencer Black
LG 27EA83-D 27" LED - IPS Monitor @ 2560x1440 10bit color
Corsair Obsidian 700D
Dêck Legend Toxic - Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Sennheiser HD280 Headphones
10-18-09, 01:55 PM #3
they all read from the same sensors, but you may need to adjust your T junction thingy for it to be most accurate
¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸© Poor Planning On Your Part Does Not Constitute An Emergency On My Part ©¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸
¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸© The trouble with life is there’s no background music ©¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸
¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸© Life isnt short, you're just dead for too long©¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸
10-18-09, 02:01 PM #4
Some considerations to factor in:
1. What CPU are you running? AMD CPUs with the Brisbane core had broken thermal sensors and gave obviously inaccurate temps, especially at idle.
2. Are you sure you are measuring the same thing with all the programs? Some may be measuring core temp and some CPU temp. They are different. Core temp readings refer to the internal temp of the processor itself wheil CPU temps refer to a reading in the socket area below the CPU. They are usually withing a few degrees of one another, however.
3. Speedfan's labels are often wrong. That is to say it often incorrectly identifies the various sensors in the system. If you open up the program, run Prime95, and watch the deltas you can easily identify which temp readings go with the cores/CPU as opposed to say, chipset sensors or other environmental sensors on the motherbaord. The core/CPU readings will rise very quicly compared to the others and the core temp readings will usually be a little higher than CPU temp readings when max is achieved. Speedfan is a wonderul, very useful program. It just needs a little tweeking. The labels can be edited, by the way, to match sensor names with their correct temps. Keep in mind also that currently, Speedfan only gives one core temp reading even when you have a multi core processor. I think it either takes the reading from the hottest core or averages them.
Last edited by trents; 10-18-09 at 02:11 PM.CPU: firstname.lastname@example.org
Motherboard: ASRock Z270 Killer SLI/ac
Cooler: Custom loop with Swiftech MCP50X pump, EK-Spremacy Evo block, Koolance 360x29mm 30 fins per in. radiator, 38x120mm 4000rpm Delta fans on Sunbeam Rheobus Extreme fan speed controller
RAM: 2x8 gb Crucial 2400 Ballistic DDR4
GPU: 2xMSI Armor Rx 480 4 gb in Crossfire X/ 1080p Asus monitor
Case: NZXT Source 530
PSU: OCZ 750W
Storage: Segate 480 gb SSD + 1x1tb spinner
OS: Windows 10
Jesus said, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father but through me." John 14:6
10-18-09, 02:29 PM #5
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
Yeah, my BIOS temps are closest to CoreTemp it seems.
I am running a new i5 so just want to make sure I don't cook it
Thanks all for your help
10-18-09, 02:51 PM #6