Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19

    i5 board w/ SATA3

    So simply put I have $500 coming to me and its basically free money I did very little to earn it. I want to upgrade my current system and give my old setup to a long time friend who lost his PC when he got robbed.

    *edit*
    Note that everything not listed I all ready have psu/hdd etc. I just have a DDR2 setup so board upgrade = all new components :P

    Currently I am looking at this.
    Memory
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820231180

    i5 750
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115215

    Cooling
    Spire TherMax Eclipse II

    The question is what is a good motherboard for SATA 3? When the SF-2000 / G3 comes out I plan to buy my first SSD then. Currently this peaks my attention here.
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131620

    or
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813128425

    My question is if I need to add a x4 card can I with the black PCI x16 slot? If so will it limit the GPU from x16 to x8 or x4 slowing performance? My next GPU will be a 460 or a 6850.


    I have never needed to SLI and from what I hear its better just to get the best single GPU you can. Currently I run a GTX 260 192 core and it still maxes my games @ 1680x1050 22'' monitor.
    1 question I did have on SLI/Crossfire. It says x16 in single and x8 x8 when using two cards, does 8x8 effect performance vs say a x16 x16 board? Also is the current SATA3 boards actually able to hit 500mb or is it like "dx11" cards that are really not powerful enough to play DX11 like the first generation was? If it is I would need a x4 slot for a adapter to get over the limits of the south bridge correct?

    Thank you very much
    Last edited by Zuriel; 11-15-10 at 08:41 PM.

  2. #2
    Member attack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Dayton. OH
    Posts
    4,757
    I think the SATA 3 is a good choice especialy when considering a new sandforce SSD in march. (although I would try to find a cheap used one for the next 4 months to tide you over).

    Native SATA 3 or USB 3.0 isn't available on any chipsets yet (Including the new P67) I haven't heard anything about X68 or a ICH11R coming out this year. Everything connects to the chipset using PCI-e lanes...whethere it's the PCI-e slots, the marvel controller, or the ICH10R controller.

    I wouldn't worry about getting an odd on card for the SSD's unless you want to try and run 4+ SSD's in RAID 0, in which case I'd recommend a X58 board since it has more pci-e lanes. If you do run a 4x card in one of the other slots I'm not sure if your main slot will drop to 8x and 8x or if it will stay 16x and 4x (But I think it's 8 and 8....so your 4x card would be wasting 4 pci-e lanes).

    I've seen a few reviews comparing SLI and crossfire with P55 boards (8x and 8x) vs X58 (both full 16x) and it was almost negligable (however that was a year ago, newer cards will use more bandwidth and possibly exploit the limitations of 8x).

    I'm fairly certain SATA 3 will be extremely important when sandforce drives are released. the Interface should handle 600MB/s, and SSD's will start nipping at that limit soon (if not already).

    To sum up what board to get, any board with SATA 3 (which will likely have USB 3.0 as well) and one that's not expensive. Save the cash for a boot SSD!

    I recommend using onboard SATA 3 and not getting a controller or anything crazy unless you're prepared to start shelling out $ and if you do that you should move to a X58.
    i5-3570k @ 4.5ghz WC'd
    MSI Z77A-G41
    R9 280X
    2x4gb PC16000
    256GB Samsung 840
    Sennheiser HDR-120's
    Dell U2713HM
    "Computer games dont affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, wed all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitve electonic dance music..." - Kristian Wilson, Nintendo Inc, 1989

  3. #3
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19
    Yeah I plan to see what BF gives. I wont go over $1 a GB for the current SSD as Intel is releasing the G3 Feb. Which unless rumors are wrong should provide a fast SSD at a affordable price tag. If its true 25nm is 50% more cost effective to make then in theory it a 160GB should cost $230 or so. The next gen of the G3 might be true SATA3 drives as well.

    My biggest issue is it seems that ALL boards seem to provide sata 3 based off the PCIe bandwidth. So if I have a x16 GPU slot and enable it will turn it into a x8. I know its minor but its still a drawback and 5% loss of performance.

  4. #4
    Member attack's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Dayton. OH
    Posts
    4,757
    I think I may have mispoke...the only way SATA 3 will drop your pci-e 16x down is if you put a card controller card in the other pci-e slot. If you use the onboard controllers your video card 16x slot will stay at 16x

    *edit*
    Hmmm I may be wrong based on this article....let me do some more research!
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/2973/6...ntel-x58-p55/3
    Last edited by attack; 11-17-10 at 02:00 AM.
    i5-3570k @ 4.5ghz WC'd
    MSI Z77A-G41
    R9 280X
    2x4gb PC16000
    256GB Samsung 840
    Sennheiser HDR-120's
    Dell U2713HM
    "Computer games dont affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, wed all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitve electonic dance music..." - Kristian Wilson, Nintendo Inc, 1989

  5. #5
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19
    Roger that and I appreciate your help. This is a rather confusing issue as most "offical" forums give me a smoke screen to avoid pointing out the obvious flaw.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •