• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Is something wrong with my GTX460?

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
Well maybe someone can help me. I have a gts 450 that is way outperforming a gtx 460.

Vidia control panel/Manage 3D settings/global settings/power management mode does not exist, as i.m useing winXP.

Rebooting doesnt work, riva tuner does not see my drivers, which are 260.99 by the way.

I hope someone can help, Please?
 
Finally got a good and stable OC on my MSi card, and now I'm doing 12.7K PPD on these monsters :) Cant wait to see how much it will do on normal WU's...
 
Afterburner reports correct speeds. I switched the cards around and now the 450 is getting low ppd. The wu are p6800 and are worth 1298 points.

Here are the benchmarks for the 6800 project.

-- 460 --

Min. Time / Frame : 1mn 48s - 10384.00 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 1mn 48s - 10384.00 ppd
Cur. Time / Frame : 1mn 49s - 10288.73 ppd
R3F. Time / Frame : 1mn 49s - 10288.73 ppd
Eff. Time / Frame : 1mn 49s - 10288.73 ppd


-- 450 --

Min. Time / Frame : 2mn 46s - 6755.86 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 2mn 46s - 6755.86 ppd
Cur. Time / Frame : 2mn 48s - 6675.43 ppd
R3F. Time / Frame : 2mn 47s - 6715.40 ppd
Eff. Time / Frame : 2mn 46s - 6755.86 ppd

I am beginning to suspect that one of the FAH clients maybe bad, is this likely?
 
Last edited:
About 1.50 TPF is normal for a GTX460 on the 6800WU's. I'm guessing that you have overclocked the card a bit? But i dont know how the GTX450 are suppose to handle the 6800 WU's, 6.7K PPD does seam a little low.

Did you switch the cards around physically or in the client witn -gpu 0/-gpu 1?
 
The p6800 saturates the shaders of the 450 to the point it "chokes". It's probably going to be the future of FAH, larger and larger GPU projects that need more shaders for maximum performance.
 
Gamma you were originally doing ok with the 450 till you switched ...if your not sure whitch gpu is "taking over" pull the 460 just run the 450 . Then you'll know what it's doing.
 
Here's how my 470 is handling these... this is at 700/1400. I can't seem to get the clocks to "stick" any higher than that... stupid card keeps downclocking itself back to stock. :(

These numbers definitely support what ChasR said regarding the larger WUs and the larger number of shaders on the higher end cards. Ignore the average and minimum. They are skewed by the card running at slightly higher speeds and then at stock. The numbers in red are what the card does at 700/1400.

Code:
 Project ID: 6800
 Core: OPENMMGPU
 Credit: 1298
 Frames: 100


 Name: nVidia GPU - GTX470 @ (700/1400)
 Number of Frames Observed: 300

 Min. Time / Frame : 00:01:18 - 14,377.8 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:02:17 - 8,185.9 PPD
[COLOR="Red"][B] Cur. Time / Frame : 00:01:23 - 13,511.7 PPD
 R3F. Time / Frame : 00:01:23 - 13,511.7 PPD
 All  Time / Frame : 00:01:23 - 13,511.7 PPD[/B][/COLOR]
 Eff. Time / Frame : 00:01:55 - 9,751.9 PPD
 
Something else is odd about these WUs. Running a 6800 on my GTS 460 and GPU-Z shows it at 66% GPU load. It's normally at 97-98% when folding. Are they intentionally not fully loading the GPU? My shader speed is right where it should be. It's giving me 7282 PPD.

And fwiw, my 8800 GT on the same PC is getting a 404 error trying do dl a new core - fahcore_65.exe.
 
Back