• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

[O/C] Futuremark Release 3DMark 11

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
P15436

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/101893

Eva come catch my 480's :)

maybe i will eventually hehe

finally, broke 15k 3dmark11 with HD5970 + 2x HD5870 http://i4memory.com/f54/my-first-retail-i7-980x-3013a489-experience-27170/#post138789 :D

3dmark11 = 15,049 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/189647

i7 980X @4.7ghz
HD5970@995/1297 + 2xHD5870 @1030/1282
Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
HX1000 + OP1200

Powermate measured 785 watts from HX1000 psu, so ~340-350w from OP1200 = 1,135 watts for system :)

3d11_10301297_9951282_15049_full_tn.png
 
maybe i will eventually hehe

finally, broke 15k 3dmark11 with HD5970 + 2x HD5870 http://i4memory.com/f54/my-first-retail-i7-980x-3013a489-experience-27170/#post138789 :D

3dmark11 = 15,049 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/189647

i7 980X @4.7ghz
HD5970@995/1297 + 2xHD5870 @1030/1282
Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
HX1000 + OP1200

Powermate measured 785 watts from HX1000 psu, so ~340-350w from OP1200 = 1,135 watts for system :)

3d11_10301297_9951282_15049_full_tn.png

Your getting close I'm gonna have to stop gaming and get back to oc'ing :)

great score though
 
Hey someone with some crossfired ATI cards put Cat 10.5a CAP4 on and watch the magic happen with your scores. I bet a 4k point loss for eva when using the newest cats...:p

I wonder if thats a bug or just Crossfire doing its thing in the 10.5's though...
 
Last edited:
Sorry all, i just haven't had time to sift through and update the OP. On a positive note, I received an email this morning from Futuremark and the first bug-fix is out! (Bold part added by me for emphasis.)

It's almost a week since we released 3DMark 11 and we're rapidly closing on 200,000 result submissions from eager overclockers around the world.

Unfortunately such wide scale use has brought to light a few issues that weren't caught by our own testing. So today we are releasing an update to 3DMark 11 to fix those problems and add a couple of requested features. Note, until NVIDIA release new drivers SLI will continue to be unavailable in 3DMark 11.

The full release notes are below. 3DMark 11 users can download the update from:
http://www.3dmark.com/3dmark11/download/update/

Best wishes,
Oliver

Oliver Baltuch
President
Futuremark Inc.
+ 1 408 718 8363 (PST)


3DMark 11 version 1.01 release notes

- Fixed an issue with SystemInfo that prevented the Physics and Combined tests from running.
- Fixed an issue that could cause a crash if the DirectX 11 API or .NET was not available.
- Fixed an issue that could cause a crash if the number of system GPUs was unknown.
- Letterboxing and scaling now works with wide displays.
- The benchmark UI is now minimized during the benchmark run.
- Improved result security when submitting to 3dmark.com.
- Added automatic update notification.
- Updated SystemInfo component to version 3.54.1.1.

Advanced and Professional Edition only
- Added option for manual GPU Count selection to the Advanced tab.
- Added Scaling Mode selection to the Advanced tab, choose from centred or stretched.
- Results tab now shows the individual scores for each of the six tests.

Professional Edition only
- Demo audio now works when running from the command line.
- Image Quality tool now handles unexpected parameters correctly.
- Image Quality tool now works correctly with the reference rasterizer option.

Download update now: http://www.3dmark.com/3dmark11/download/update/
 
Sweet!

Jeremy, I can go ahead and start an 'official' type thread for this like the other 3D's...
 
there are also new builds for all futuremark benches other than 01. and you will need them to submit any results.
 
Greaaaaaat. More updates to them? When did that come out? I just ran 06 and vantage last night... or did you mean at hwbot?
 
Sweet!

Jeremy, I can go ahead and start an 'official' type thread for this like the other 3D's...

If you want to take it on, I wouldn't argue. Time has not been kind enough to allow updating this thing as I had hoped. I'd move the posts from here to there, but they would show up before your OP because of their time/date stamp.
 
Started. And I will get them over to the thread somehow... ;)

Any chance, when you have a moment, you want to link it up to the first post?
 
they are builds 1901 for all the earlier ones. I tried to submit with earlier versions and it told me they are incompatible. could be different now as it was during the rebuild at futuremark
 
Very odd. The versions they point you to are the same ones that were released in February. Maybe their new ORB is screwy?
 
I hadnt updated mine in quite some time, as I had them on a drive that I always have for benching, just freshen the os's and leave the apps.
 
Back