Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Not sure what it was Member Theocnoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada. Eh?

    3040b383 = 'Meh' i7 950 batch?



    I'd heard of 950's doing 200x20 on 1.27v bios setting so I'm a little disappointed that mine isn't guaranteed uberstable below 1.31v. Even at 1.30 after priming for a couple of hours it goes kerplunk. That's been my latest tweaking, getting voltages to the minimum happy number and that's as low as it'll go.

    I got a really good bin conroe E6550 3 years ago. But this guy not so much.

    Anybody have one of those mythical 950's that'll run 4Ghz @ 1.27? Or less? Any idea what the 'e4' after the batch means?

  2. #2
    Member
    10 Year Badge
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Heatware Profile
    1.31v @ 4ghz isnt bad really. i7-950's dont seem to clock as well as the i7-920s did. Even the 930s dont clock like the 920s. I was 4ghz stable @ 1.25v if I remember right on my 920, and 4.5ghz stable at 1.42v.

    You gotta realize that all chips are different. You are achieving 4ghz @ 1.31v, which is nothing to be ashamed of. You may be able to get a 4ghz overclock w/ slightly less voltage with a lower bclock and higher multi. Sometimes it works although it never has really helped me out (some people do this).

    Also, what are your other voltages? You may be unstable on the QPI rather than core and you might need more voltage elsewhere, allowing you to lower your vcore.
    Asus P8P67
    Intel i7-2600k @ 4.9ghz
    GSkill Ripjaws 8gb 1600mhz c8
    EVGA GTX780 ACX 1228//1650
    OCZ Agility 2 240gb, Corsair Force 3 180gb, (2)WD 1tb Black
    HAF 932w/ Corsair HX750
    Heat

  3. #3
    Researches Meritless
    LIES for the Front
    Page and Super Mutterator

    Overclockers.com Editor
    First Responders

    EarthDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Stuck in Maryland...
    Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile
    Quote Originally Posted by doz View Post
    1.31v @ 4ghz isnt bad really. i7-950's dont seem to clock as well as the i7-920s did. Even the 930s dont clock like the 920s. I was 4ghz stable @ 1.25v if I remember right on my 920, and 4.5ghz stable at 1.42v.

    You gotta realize that all chips are different. You are achieving 4ghz @ 1.31v, which is nothing to be ashamed of. You may be able to get a 4ghz overclock w/ slightly less voltage with a lower bclock and higher multi. Sometimes it works although it never has really helped me out (some people do this).

    Also, what are your other voltages? You may be unstable on the QPI rather than core and you might need more voltage elsewhere, allowing you to lower your vcore.
    +1

    "We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon

  4. #4
    Not sure what it was Member Theocnoob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Canada. Eh?
    Quote Originally Posted by doz View Post
    1.31v @ 4ghz isnt bad really. i7-950's dont seem to clock as well as the i7-920s did. Even the 930s dont clock like the 920s. I was 4ghz stable @ 1.25v if I remember right on my 920, and 4.5ghz stable at 1.42v.

    You gotta realize that all chips are different. You are achieving 4ghz @ 1.31v, which is nothing to be ashamed of. You may be able to get a 4ghz overclock w/ slightly less voltage with a lower bclock and higher multi. Sometimes it works although it never has really helped me out (some people do this).

    Also, what are your other voltages? You may be unstable on the QPI rather than core and you might need more voltage elsewhere, allowing you to lower your vcore.
    Will report back after next reset. Going to play Starcraft. And lose Starcraft.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •