- Joined
- Feb 7, 2011
I am putting together a reasonably low profile computer for my brother, its main aims are typical usage + some flash acceleration; maybe possibly the odd game, nothing serious.
I don't understand how HT works, besides common sense that bigger numbers usually mean faster. The board i picked out does 1000 MT/s compared to 2000 MT/s with HT 2.0. Will the specified systems really notice a throttle with HT 1.0? The bandwidth room is something like 3.2GB/s with a uni-directional 16bit linkwidth. The board only supports PCIe 1.0 and besides typical devices and a low profile GFX card, there is nothing to really pull more than that.
are my assumptions correct? what kind of cards require pcie 2.0? is there any benefits for low end cards?
Thanks.
http://www.scan.co.uk/products/msi-...dr3-1333-1600(oc)-sata-ii-3b-s-sata-raid-uatx
http://www.scan.co.uk/products/amd-...l-core-s-am3-32ghz-7mb-total-cache-80w-retail
http://www.scan.co.uk/products/512mb-msi-g210-graphics-card-589mhz-core-gddr2-800mhz-memory
I don't understand how HT works, besides common sense that bigger numbers usually mean faster. The board i picked out does 1000 MT/s compared to 2000 MT/s with HT 2.0. Will the specified systems really notice a throttle with HT 1.0? The bandwidth room is something like 3.2GB/s with a uni-directional 16bit linkwidth. The board only supports PCIe 1.0 and besides typical devices and a low profile GFX card, there is nothing to really pull more than that.
are my assumptions correct? what kind of cards require pcie 2.0? is there any benefits for low end cards?
Thanks.
http://www.scan.co.uk/products/msi-...dr3-1333-1600(oc)-sata-ii-3b-s-sata-raid-uatx
http://www.scan.co.uk/products/amd-...l-core-s-am3-32ghz-7mb-total-cache-80w-retail
http://www.scan.co.uk/products/512mb-msi-g210-graphics-card-589mhz-core-gddr2-800mhz-memory