- Joined
- Jul 30, 2009
I'd like to see a picture of the SB-E and your hand to see the size of this thing... Working on the boss to get some of them
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Yes, that's correct. We're looking at the same +/- ~10MHz bclk there was on SNB. The difference is those straps, which give much more flexibility with memory frequencies.i didn't think bclk went above 100mhz all FSB strap did was add a multi so it was like 125mhz, 150mhz, 200mhz and 250mhz. but blck stayed at 100mhz. thats how I understood it working. Clarification?
I'd like to see a picture of the SB-E and your hand to see the size of this thing... Working on the boss to get some of them
Thanks!
Haha...what's more amusing is that I've heard the chipset is what's driving up the price of these boards. It's not much better than P67. I can't imagine precisely why it costs so much more to produce. If it had at least six SATA 6Gb/s ports along with USB 3.0 native support, maybe...but it doesn't. No idea what they were thinking with this one. The CPUs are insanely powerful, but the chipset? Not so much.
That is an interesting point that this chipset was so neutered from what it orginally started out as...Im wndering how it can be so much more towards the cost?!