Results 1 to 14 of 14
Thread: Crucial 256GB M4 Review
11-28-11, 10:46 AM #1
Crucial 256GB M4 ReviewWith prices falling, SSDs are rapidly becoming mainstream and are included in a vast number of new builds. The Crucial RealSSD M4 series of SSDs are the newest drives from Crucial, available in 64 GB, 128 GB, 256 GB and 512 GB models. Crucial have kindly supplied a 256 GB unit for review, along with a data transfer kit.
Last edited by hokiealumnus; 11-28-11 at 04:08 PM.
11-28-11, 01:05 PM #2
Nice review, David.
I don't think I saw it mentioned, but I believe that the [write] performance gains from the Sandforce 22** series really show up when using compressible data vs non-compressible, and with non-compressible they are about the same. Do you know if/which of the different benchmarks use which type of data?
11-28-11, 01:21 PM #3
Any word of long-term reliability? Only reason I didnt buy an SF drive is how poorly my agility II did and since returned. In spite of the obvious performance benefits I went with a pair of intel drives instead.
11-28-11, 03:57 PM #4
Got to ask is the transfer cable that comes with it now just USB 2.0 or USB 3.0?
It does come in handy if you need a fast portable drive (SSD that is) to carry around if it comes with a USB 3.0 interface. I know the one I got sadly was just a USB 2.0 interface a while back with my 128Gig drive. Still nice for those situations where you need an adaptor though wish it was of the faster type that is out there.-=The Gamer=-
MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) | i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz | 1.3875V | 28C Idle / 65C Load (LinX)
8Gig G.Skill Ripjaw PC3-12800 9-9-9-24 @ 1600Mhz w/ 1.5V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
Asus DCUII R9 290 1075/1300 w/ 1.05V GPU | 36C Idle / 75C Load | 128/256GB Crucial M4 SSD's / 512GB Samsung 840 Pro
BitFenix Shinobi Window Case | SilverStone DA750 | Samsung UD590 28" 4k | Oculus Rift DK2 - Incoming October 2014
Synology DS1511+ | Dual Core 1.8Ghz CPU | 30C Idle / 38C Load
3 Gig PC2-6400 | 4x Samsung F4 2TB Raid5 | 1x Samsung F4 2TB
11-28-11, 07:39 PM #5
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
Nice review, but something looks wrong on the 4K Iometer graph
Nice summary on the M4. Great work translating all the test runs to the visual graphs for comparison. It makes looking at your two separate reviews easier to compare.
Do you have an error in your final graph that shows the results for the Iometer 4K runs? It says sequential reads and writes, but I think the 4K tests are random. Therefore I assume the graph shows the random reads are significantly lower for the M4 compared to the OCZ Vertex 3. Am I somehow reading that wrong?
11-29-11, 08:15 AM #6
Thanks for the comments guys . Just a quick reply for now as I'm on a phone.
I'll check which benchmarks use compressable data - I suspect those where the Vertex is clearly better.
I think the cable is usb2 unfortunately, but I'll check when i get home. My desktop has USB 3.
Not sure about reliability from first hand experience - only had it a few weeks. I've heard no complaints thus far, lookking on the web.
The graph axis has a mistake - it's 4k random. I'll fix it tonight or tomorrow .
DDavid J. Nelson MChem(Edin) PhD(Strath) MRSC [ResearcherID: D-3927-2011] [Google Scholar]
OC Forums Super Moderator // Overclockers.com Editor
The Workhorse: [Lenovo W510] Intel Core i7-720QM / 8 GB DDR3 / nVidia Quadro FX880M / Crucial M4 256 GB SSD / Windows 7
The Home Machine: AMD Llano A6-3650 APU / 8 GB DDR3 / Lots of HDDs / Antec Dark Fleet DF-85 Case / Windows 7
The Benchmarking Setup: Various LGA775 chips / Asus Rampage Formula / 2 GB OCZ 1066 MHz DDR2 / nVidia Quadro NVS 285 / 320 GB HDD / Windows 7 [ Untouched for well over a year ]
My research fellowship is eating all my time, so I may be slow to reply to emails and private messages.
11-29-11, 08:41 AM #7
Excellent review David!
Im not sure off the top of my head but my V3 240GB review does mention which is which I believe.Should I R0 my SSD? / Sandy/Ivybridge Overclocking Guide / Haswell Overclocking Guide / AMD Overclocking Guide / Power Supply Guide
SSD Reliability/Write Endurance / JOIN THE BENCHING TEAM! / Bulldozer Overclocking Guide
Want to see your writing featured on the overclockers.com Front Page? PM me, I can help!
"We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon
11-29-11, 01:40 PM #8
Very nice review David. I take it that the OCZ Veritex has the Indilix controller? Which is faster?I.M.O.G. "It's a plugin issue," ...
Asus P8P67 Pro
4g Corsair Dominator 667
11-29-11, 03:03 PM #9
I believe only the new OCZ (Octane) drives have the Indilix controller
11-29-11, 03:10 PM #10
Vertex 3, Vertex 3 Max IOPS, and Agility 3 are all sandforce 2281 with the difference between them being the type of NAND used. They use sync, toggle, and async in the order previously mentioned.
The new octane used the first new indilix controller to see retail in something like three years.
11-29-11, 04:43 PM #11
Excellent and useful information in the featured article and this thread. Thanks guys.I.M.O.G. "It's a plugin issue," ...
Asus P8P67 Pro
4g Corsair Dominator 667
12-06-11, 07:06 PM #12
Computational Oncologist / Biomathematician / Moderator on Vacation, Ph.D.
Very nice review, David! Looks like a very solid offering! Thanks for bringing up the point that different sizes will get different performances due to number of chips. As I recall, for fixed drive sizes, performance can go down between generations due to the decreased number of chips.
Reliability concerns have also sent me to an Intel 320 (120gb), like Sentential. Thanks for the extra info, BossBorot!
12-06-11, 09:22 PM #13
One minor concern, the Crucial M4 is just that - Crucial M4. The RealSSD brand was for the C300 drivesHTPC - i5 2500k - 212+ - GA-Z68MX-UD2H-B3 - 2x4GB G.Skill DDR3-1600 - Crucial MX100 512GB, Spinpoint F3 1TB w/M4 64GB ISRT Cache
MSI GTX 970 4GB - Silverstone LC10B-E - Corsair RM550
-----Main - i5 6500 - GA-H170M-D3H - 2x8GB Corsair DDR4-2133 - Samsung 950 Pro 256GB
Gigabyte GTX 960 2GB - Silverstone TJ08 - Corsair CX400W
Nothin' up my sleeve..
12-06-11, 09:55 PM #14
Fixed the article title some time ago, the title of the comments never got fixed - good catch however.The OC Forums Way
We are a team. We are a community. We are a fellowship made strong by mutual respect and shared dedication to the task of enriching all who come here.
The OC Forums Thank You Thread