- Thread Starter
- #21
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Mining Equip Database [old-2015]
- Thread starter bluezero5
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2002
- Location
- New Jersey
Equip: nvidia 9800gtx+ (gts 250) 512mb
Setting: core: 810 Mem: 1280
Hash rate: 36.3
Miner: cudaminer 12-18-2013
Parameters: auto L28x3
temp: 79c
Equip: Asus GTX 780 DCII OC 3gb
Setting: core: 1137 Mem: 1527
Hash rate: 560khash/s
Miner: cudaminer 12-18-2013
Parameters: -l T12x32 -H 1 -m 0 -i 0
temp: 69c fan @ 80%
Setting: core: 810 Mem: 1280
Hash rate: 36.3
Miner: cudaminer 12-18-2013
Parameters: auto L28x3
temp: 79c
Equip: Asus GTX 780 DCII OC 3gb
Setting: core: 1137 Mem: 1527
Hash rate: 560khash/s
Miner: cudaminer 12-18-2013
Parameters: -l T12x32 -H 1 -m 0 -i 0
temp: 69c fan @ 80%
Last edited:
Equip: AMD 7850 1gb (PowerColor)
Setting: core: 1000 Mem: 1300
Hash rate: 349 Kh/s
Miner: cgminer 3.7.2
Parameters: -I 19 -w 256 -tc 8192
temp: 57C
Equip: AMD 6870 1gb (XFX)
Setting: core: 900 Mem: 1050
Hash rate: 294 Kh/s
Miner: cgminer 3.7.2
Parameters: -I 18 -w 256 -tc 6720
temp: 78C
I know it's a lot more work but could you put the cards in the order of what they are instead of just the order they are posted? It's going to get really confusing finding results that way without some kind of order.
Setting: core: 1000 Mem: 1300
Hash rate: 349 Kh/s
Miner: cgminer 3.7.2
Parameters: -I 19 -w 256 -tc 8192
temp: 57C
Equip: AMD 6870 1gb (XFX)
Setting: core: 900 Mem: 1050
Hash rate: 294 Kh/s
Miner: cgminer 3.7.2
Parameters: -I 18 -w 256 -tc 6720
temp: 78C
I know it's a lot more work but could you put the cards in the order of what they are instead of just the order they are posted? It's going to get really confusing finding results that way without some kind of order.
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
Nice graph! 
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2005
Yeah! Looks awesome dude!
I put the 6870 in the lower slow and the 7850 on the upper and now the 6870 runs 75c at only 40% fan and the 7850 runs 61c (still quiet at 55% fan). Much happier now because it's running quieter and cooler.
Stuck a 6790 in the wife's rig-
Equip: AMD 6790 1gb (powercolor)
Setting: core: 950 Mem: 1150
Hash rate: 224 Kh/s
Miner: cgminer 3.7.2
Parameters: -I 17 -w 256 -tc 3500
temp: 74C
Last edited:
- Thread Starter
- #32
I managed to tested another set of R9 290 from Gigabyte
Equip: AMD R9 290 (Gigabyte)
Setting: core: 980 Mem: 1250 PowerOutput +5%
Hash rate: 860 Kh/s
Miner: cgminer 3.7.2
Parameters: -I 20 -w 512
temp: 84'C
Hotter than the rest, but faster than the rest I tested.
Equip: AMD R9 290 (Gigabyte)
Setting: core: 980 Mem: 1250 PowerOutput +5%
Hash rate: 860 Kh/s
Miner: cgminer 3.7.2
Parameters: -I 20 -w 512
temp: 84'C
Hotter than the rest, but faster than the rest I tested.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2002
- Location
- New Jersey
I made a few changes. went from 480khash to 550khash
cudaminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://pickaxe.pool.pm:3301 -O Gabkicks.gabkicks1:342t42g2 -l T12x32 -H 1 -m 0 -i 0
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
I made a few changes. went from 480khash to 550khash
cudaminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://pickaxe.pool.pm:3301 -O Gabkicks.gabkicks1:342t42g2 -l T12x32 -H 1 -m 0 -i 0
I used cudaminer for a bit, but I don't even know your flags... What does the -m 0 and -H 1 flags do?
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2002
- Location
- Rootstown, OH
-H determines how much work is pushed to GPU versus CPU. Cudaminee can do everything on the GPU, some on the CPU single threaded, or multithreaded on the cpu. I think this only relates to the sha256 operations required, not the script part. This is documented pretty well in the cudaminer readme.
I'm currently pushing a GTX 760, doing about 220kh/s since the last LTC difficulty increase. Was pushing 275kh/s consistently before that, with the 12/18 cudaminer - that was a really nice boost. This is with the fan at 100% which holds around 73C max, and reads at 105% tdp in gpuz. 1250 core/6100 memory - it can run higher, but crashes once a day randomly if I go to 1280 on the core.
I'm also deploying a couple hundred PCs currently for a part time job, and during configuration Ive got them mining on radeon 8490's - about 35kh/s on cgminer. Running 16 rigs at a time for about 560 kh/s.
I'm currently pushing a GTX 760, doing about 220kh/s since the last LTC difficulty increase. Was pushing 275kh/s consistently before that, with the 12/18 cudaminer - that was a really nice boost. This is with the fan at 100% which holds around 73C max, and reads at 105% tdp in gpuz. 1250 core/6100 memory - it can run higher, but crashes once a day randomly if I go to 1280 on the core.
I'm also deploying a couple hundred PCs currently for a part time job, and during configuration Ive got them mining on radeon 8490's - about 35kh/s on cgminer. Running 16 rigs at a time for about 560 kh/s.
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2005
-H determines how much work is pushed to GPU versus CPU. Cudaminee can do everything on the GPU, some on the CPU single threaded, or multithreaded on the cpu. I think this only relates to the sha256 operations required, not the script part. This is documented pretty well in the cudaminer readme.
I'm currently pushing a GTX 760, doing about 220kh/s since the last LTC difficulty increase. Was pushing 275kh/s consistently before that, with the 12/18 cudaminer - that was a really nice boost. This is with the fan at 100% which holds around 73C max, and reads at 105% tdp in gpuz. 1250 core/6100 memory - it can run higher, but crashes once a day randomly if I go to 1280 on the core.
I'm also deploying a couple hundred PCs currently for a part time job, and during configuration Ive got them mining on radeon 8490's - about 35kh/s on cgminer. Running 16 rigs at a time for about 560 kh/s.
probably better off having them cpu mine xpm, or pts for you!
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
-H determines how much work is pushed to GPU versus CPU. Cudaminee can do everything on the GPU, some on the CPU single threaded, or multithreaded on the cpu. I think this only relates to the sha256 operations required, not the script part. This is documented pretty well in the cudaminer readme.
I'm currently pushing a GTX 760, doing about 220kh/s since the last LTC difficulty increase. Was pushing 275kh/s consistently before that, with the 12/18 cudaminer - that was a really nice boost. This is with the fan at 100% which holds around 73C max, and reads at 105% tdp in gpuz. 1250 core/6100 memory - it can run higher, but crashes once a day randomly if I go to 1280 on the core.
I'm also deploying a couple hundred PCs currently for a part time job, and during configuration Ive got them mining on radeon 8490's - about 35kh/s on cgminer. Running 16 rigs at a time for about 560 kh/s.
Hey, 560 Kh/s is double what I can make! Good work I.M.O.G!
I never looked to deeply into cudaminer flags, I found what worked and went with it.
I got 100 Kh/s out of my MSI N550GTX Cyclone 2. Stock is 80Kh/s, so you can Imagine my overclocks
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2002
- Location
- Rootstown, OH
Nice. With the latest cudaminer, without flags, auto tune is really good for me - on the 12/10 cudaminer manual flags really increased performance for me. Seems like the newer release automates things better to me, at least on my GTX 760.
@dyckah: You are probably right. I just threw something on there that I knew how to do quickly however - I was actually working, and it only took a minute to fire up the mining while the systems wait for deployment.
@dyckah: You are probably right. I just threw something on there that I knew how to do quickly however - I was actually working, and it only took a minute to fire up the mining while the systems wait for deployment.
- Thread Starter
- #40
hmmm.. 780 at 550 kh/s NVDA is catching up with the AMD mining wagon.
though cost wise, AMD card mines better, but of course, not everyone buys the card to mine, and for that, I have a 3xx GTX 680 set up. Mining at 1050 Kh/s
though cost wise, AMD card mines better, but of course, not everyone buys the card to mine, and for that, I have a 3xx GTX 680 set up.
Mining at 1050 Kh/s 
