• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

XP and SSD Drives

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

RollingThunder

Destroyer of Trolls & Spammers
Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Will XP satisfactorily support an SSD drive? Not out of necessity but our of curiosity.
Any caveats?
 
There are programs for trim that run on XP.
Only other thing I can think of is that you have to do manual alignment, but there are programs for that too. The rig I'm on right now has had a SSD on XP for 5 years now.
 
ED, Scotty,

I didn't know any of this. Regardless of XP's SSD support shortcomings it's safe to assume it's still better than a hard drive that needs to be replaced.

Thank you both. :thup:
 
win7 and win8, if they perform the format should do partition alignment wihtout having to fight it
 
Will XP run on an SSD? Yes. All posts above are relevant and accurate. Let me add that encryption may be an issue too, if the drive supports it.
 
OK, good points. This is for the non-Internet unit in my profile. A home unit that needs to retain XP
for the purpose of using older .dbf databases so encryption and lacking all the SSD performance enhancers
are not a deal breaker. The databases are not compatible with anything newer than versions of XP / XP Pro
and I really don't want to move to Access now.
 
How did you.... I was literally just thinking about that (in regards to some old friends). Here's what I know:
The alignment is quite important for the speed. Make sure you do it.

The lack of trim is a problem with vista and xp. Don't use a sandforce drive. Use any drive that has good performance recovery without trim-- like the neutron, or samsung's drives.

And you're golden.
 
Sandforce makes no difference. This rig has a 5 year old Sandforce based Patriot Inferno in it. I've never had a single problem with it. All SSD's, even in XP, have garbage collection.
 
You'll be fine.
If you already have XP on the SSD, I have a program I can send you that will align the drive without destroying your install.
 
As far as I'm aware, Scott, that's not correct. Here's where I learned about sandforce's weakness in trim-lacking environments.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4256/the-ocz-vertex-3-review-120gb/13

Look at the "After Torture" table. This is what your drive will become over time. 38MBs is pretty darn slow for an ssd.


RT: You'll probably be okay, though. You won't be writing much data to the drive, will you? This will only become a problem once you've written to all the blocks. Which is a little over 120GBs of data.


Edit 2: Furthermore, here's what a samsung 830 with good garbage collection can do without trim. It's pretty cool!

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4863/the-samsung-ssd-830-review/6


Edit 3: Sorry for all the edits. Apparently the 520's firmware is much better than the vertex 3's. Here's the worst it should get on xp:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5508/...cherryville-brings-reliability-to-sandforce/7

Which is probably more than fast enough for you, RT. I wouldn't worry about it.
 
Last edited:
As far as I'm aware, Scott, that's not correct. Here's where I learned about sandforce's weakness in trim-lacking environments.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4256/the-ocz-vertex-3-review-120gb/13

Look at the "After Torture" table. This is what your drive will become over time. 38MBs is pretty darn slow for an ssd.


RT: You'll probably be okay, though. You won't be writing much data to the drive, will you? This will only become a problem once you've written to all the blocks. Which is a little over 120GBs of data.


Edit 2: Furthermore, here's what a samsung 830 with good garbage collection can do without trim. It's pretty cool!

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4863/the-samsung-ssd-830-review/6


Edit 3: Sorry for all the edits. Apparently the 520's firmware is much better than the vertex 3's. Here's the worst it should get on xp:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5508/...cherryville-brings-reliability-to-sandforce/7

Which is probably more than fast enough for you, RT. I wouldn't worry about it.

What's not correct?
Here's my 5 year old SF drive. Original OS install BTW, on my daily task machine.
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    74 KB · Views: 76
I should have been more clear. Sandforce controllers become irrecoverably slow in no-trim environments. Most other controller types don't.

As you can see with your drive there, the speeds are quite poor. Take a look at this anandtech review:

http://anandtech.com/show/3656/corsairs-force-ssd-reviewed-sf1200-is-very-good

It's almost identical to your drive in specs, but look at the performance delta. Ouch. XP's not treating that drive well.
 
I should have been more clear. Sandforce controllers become irrecoverably slow in no-trim environments. Most other controller types don't.

As you can see with your drive there, the speeds are quite poor. Take a look at this anandtech review:

http://anandtech.com/show/3656/corsairs-force-ssd-reviewed-sf1200-is-very-good

It's almost identical to your drive in specs, but look at the performance delta. Ouch. XP's not treating that drive well.

IT'S 5 YEARS OLD......on the same OS install...ran 24/7.
It's write speed was 120 brand new.
Technology advances. Brand new it was never as fast as todays drives.
Besides, that's not my point. The point was, XP on a SSD is fine, garbage collection works independently of the OS as it's firmware driven, and trim does work via software.
Even at that, it's still 10x faster than a spinner.
 
Last edited:
10x faster than a spinner at 75 MiB/s sustained write doesn't sound right. I'm
sure 10K RPM drives can match or exceed that spec, maybe even the read
spec as well.
 
Scott. You know I'm not picking on you. Don't be mad :(

120 write speed is slow for that drive. XP didn't treat it well, and it has degraded from there. I'm not disparaging your system, dude.

Magellan, my rotating 7200 disks can handle over 100 MB/s sustained. My newest one is close to 150! <3 <3 Normally I hate rotating disks, but I needed the capacity, lol.
 
I hope I didn't offend Mr. Scott either -- after all he was
one of my favorite characters in TOS. ;)
 
I'm planning on using an SSD in a dual boot system
(XP Pro and 7). I'm hoping XP Pro will keep it's
hands off the SSD except when writing my RAMdisk
image on shutdown and reading it on boot. I'll be
using 32 GiB of the SSD for a ReadyBoost image in
7.
 
Back