• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

G.SKILL sniper 1600MHz - 9-9-9-24 1.5v

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

josilva93

Registered
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Hello, there is any1 who knows how low i can go with stock speed on latencys ?

i don't want to oc the speed, but i want to make it faster with low timmings...

can some1 give me some support on it?

i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz
Gigabyte x58-UD3R
HD5850 @ 925-1175Mhz

reggards
 
It's hard to say how low can you set timings. All depends from IC and it can vary depends from batch/series or manufacturer.
Probably you have there Hynix IC but I'm not sure. Anyway try something like this:
8-9-9-24
8-9-8-24
8-8-8-24
7-9-8-24
7-8-8-24

I doubt you can set them much tighter and for some of these settings you may need to raise voltage up to ~1.60-1.65V. Try to play some with sub timings too.
At least on this platform it won't help you much in general performance.
 
I'm running 8-8-8-21 on what appears to be similar RAM at stock voltage , but every batch , mobo , and CPU will have it's own quirks.
 
atm im running 8-9-8-21 too with 1.6V, maybe don't need that 1,6... but bumped it a bit to help stability.
 
Every memory has to be compatible with Jedec specification so at least 1.5V +/- 0.075V and up to 1.975V max for short period of time ( like unplanned spikes ). I don't think there are any 1.25V IC in mass production. All popular IC right now are 1.35V 1600 11-11-11 or 1.5V 1333 9-9-9 so 1.25V probably started as something like 1600 11-11-11 1.35V ( should be visible in SPD profile ) and after binning finished as 1.25V.
Simply 1.6V should be still safe.
 
It's like I said in the last post. SPD is 1600 1.50V as auto/default settings. XMP 1600 9-9-9 1.25V
 
I have a lousy network connection (packet loss in the 70%+ range) and couldn't get the product links to open for any details. I had no idea RAM voltages could be that low at those speeds. That's impressive.
 
Back