-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
SP's AMD build!
- Thread starter Silver_Pharaoh
- Start date
OP
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Thread Starter
- #442
Yes and yes.
1.584Vcore with rare spikes to 1.6.
Also, the weakest core #5, dropped out. The other 5 are still working....
OP
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Thread Starter
- #444
Other than unclean power to the PSU, (which shouldn't matter with this PSU) would be that this chip has had some electro-migration from me learning to OC on it.
But it's not like I fed it volts over 1.7 or anything....
OP
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Thread Starter
- #446
Naw, that PSU will power my future folding rig.
So it can't be dirty power... I dunno. I'm stumped.
I guess I just have to work on other things. Just get it stable at 4.8 or whatever and work on the NB and RAM instead.
I was just thinking. With AMD FX architecture; you ahve the 6 core version. 3 modules, 6 integer units. Each "pair" combines to a 256bit bus during certain instructions. Seems like it be vastly superior to run 4 cores on 2 matching modules, than it would be to run single core off 3 modules.
Dual and single core instruction rate should be superior, at least in my head. Can anyone comment on this?
Dual and single core instruction rate should be superior, at least in my head. Can anyone comment on this?
When these came out a couple years ago, that is what people did who wanted better performance. There are threads here and other places covering that.
First thread I ran into on google:http://www.overclock.net/t/1497163/...-not-better-for-lightly-threaded-applications
First thread I ran into on google:http://www.overclock.net/t/1497163/...-not-better-for-lightly-threaded-applications
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Locked
