-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
FEATURED Marathon SIII:April, 3DMark03
- Thread starter Johan45
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2009
Winters going by by, time to break out your freezer. I thought I would take the time today to get something going with what cold we have left ..... -3*C this am up here. Time for a snack and let things cool a bit then I'll try again.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2012
-3c I wish it was 8c this morning and 17 now
.I'm gonna have to put the pot on the 4770k for this bench some time this month. That should help.
SandbaggerGuess its time to bin CPUs...
LOL @ this run (just putting something on the board for now): Earthdog/R9 295x2/H2O/150725
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
Witchdoctor / GTX 580 / 1x / ln2 / 154778
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2012
I have to put my 580 in just for funzies!
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2012
I little bit better
Mandrake4565/GTX 780/H2O/176396
Mandrake4565/GTX 780/H2O/176396
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
Oh boy oh boy oh boy 
Lets see what this FX chip can do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lets see what this FX chip can do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2012
Better break out the 3570k this is where AMD land is no fun!Oh boy oh boy oh boy
Lets see what this FX chip can do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh boy oh boy oh boy
Lets see what this FX chip can do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Prepare for disappointment.
QFT!
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
I have no cooling for it!!! Besides, I don't want to see that chip anymore, unless it's folding.
Yes yes...
A mere 88K.
Then the whole rig black screened
Back to the drawing board.
While I'm here, why are all these GPU benches so heavily dependent on the CPU???
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2012
Just an FYI my 8350 at 5.3 scored 10k lower then my 4770k at 5.1 with my Ati 5850 on board.
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2012
fx, in the large is disappointing, but it has it's place in the home desktop.
openfoam and sparyfoam are good examples, I've been playing with this and my 8350 is much faster at running the sims than my 4790K.
Why, you might ask, my 4790K is seen as a quad core by the software that can't use virtual cores and my 8 core FX is seen as 8 cores and the sim is calculated 50-70% faster with it and if I add combustion to the sim that time really counts, it could mean hours.
openfoam and sparyfoam are good examples, I've been playing with this and my 8350 is much faster at running the sims than my 4790K.
Why, you might ask, my 4790K is seen as a quad core by the software that can't use virtual cores and my 8 core FX is seen as 8 cores and the sim is calculated 50-70% faster with it and if I add combustion to the sim that time really counts, it could mean hours.
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2006
MetalRacer / GTX980 / 1X / H2O / 194802
Similar threads
