- Joined
- Jun 28, 2012
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Summer Bench off???
- Thread starter Johan45
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
I was just looking at that,
They must have some members leave their team, they dropped below us in team standings ???
They must have some members leave their team, they dropped below us in team standings ???
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2012
A couple of their big-timers left.
Win 8/8.1 and Server 2012/R2 are allowed in situations when you can't install other OS or your hardware is not supporting older OS. It's obvious that some server, tablet etc setups won't run on Win7 or XP.
@OCN. I mentioned it in that random stuff thread. Some of their key members left an made a new team. I don't know how it will look in the futute but they're keeping OCN active looking at the points etc.
- Joined
- May 3, 2014
- Location
- Kingston, Ontario
Last edited:
When I was giving advices how to set memory and other things then guys on OCN called me troll etc. When I gave them proof for what I said, most ignored it and some were still saying that I'm talking BS. They were still giving bad advices in 500+ page thread but who cares. I'm not going to waste my time on people like that.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
- Joined
- May 3, 2014
- Location
- Kingston, Ontario
I remember your posts in the haswell-e thread on OCN about your awesome 5820k results and 1 particular guy giving you a hard time saying it couldn't be 24/7 stable unless it passed prime 95 for a gazillion years.
It's sad to see great overclockers like you giving advice and people like him not recognizing that and making it a bad learning environment for the rest of us who want to push our rigs.
There are a few bad apples on OCN that keeps questioning stability for benchers that only care (most of the time) for max points in benches.
They should split the OCN website to overclock/stock.net and another site called overclock/serious benchers.net..lol
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2012
We might as well be the serious benchers side 
I'm mean, where else have people put over 1.6V into Haswell chips on an AIO, on purpose, and still use that chip?
http://hwbot.org/submission/2768633_atminside_cpu_frequency_core_i7_4790k_5402.61_mhz
http://hwbot.org/submission/2769552_atminside_superpi___32m_core_i7_4790k_5min_59sec_237ms
http://hwbot.org/submission/2769554_atminside_superpi___1m_core_i7_4790k_6sec_833ms
Or for more:
http://hwbot.org/search/submissions...&_imageAttached=on&_videoAttached=on&offset=0
I'm mean, where else have people put over 1.6V into Haswell chips on an AIO, on purpose, and still use that chip?
http://hwbot.org/submission/2768633_atminside_cpu_frequency_core_i7_4790k_5402.61_mhz
http://hwbot.org/submission/2769552_atminside_superpi___32m_core_i7_4790k_5min_59sec_237ms
http://hwbot.org/submission/2769554_atminside_superpi___1m_core_i7_4790k_6sec_833ms
Or for more:
http://hwbot.org/search/submissions...&_imageAttached=on&_videoAttached=on&offset=0
- Joined
- May 3, 2014
- Location
- Kingston, Ontario
We might as well be the serious benchers side
I'm mean, where else have people put over 1.6V into Haswell chips on an AIO, on purpose, and still use that chip?
WOW amazing clocks and I'm surprised how much beating that chip can take on an AIO and still runs!
I ran 1.62V on my 5960x by mistake last week when trying to tweak on a x99 champion board. Almost had a heart attack as I was running on a small water loop and ambient were in the low 20 degree C.
What do you guys think about going for max memory frequencies for a monthly competition? I've just started to play around with OC'ing ram for higher frequencies than stock and find this sort of a grey area with very few guides out there. Personally this is something I want to learn and curious if others also show interest?
Maybe a category for DDR2, DDR3 and DDR4?
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/memory_clock/
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
We might as well be the serious benchers side
I'm mean, where else have people put over 1.6V into Haswell chips on an AIO, on purpose, and still use that chip?
http://hwbot.org/submission/2768633_atminside_cpu_frequency_core_i7_4790k_5402.61_mhz
http://hwbot.org/submission/2769552_atminside_superpi___32m_core_i7_4790k_5min_59sec_237ms
http://hwbot.org/submission/2769554_atminside_superpi___1m_core_i7_4790k_6sec_833ms
Or for more:
http://hwbot.org/search/submissions...&_imageAttached=on&_videoAttached=on&offset=0
That's no pansy AIO.
It eats heat better than an air conditioner
Nice clocking indeed.
Also hitting 5Ghz here too... takes a boat load of Vcore to do it though...
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2012
Well, this is a unit made by Swiftech for Cooler Master
And also it was in the middle of winter, so I may have had the window open
Shew, it's been a while since I did my memory clock. Wouldn't be a terrible idea to push my TridentX again.
That's no pansy AIO.
It eats heat better than an air conditioner
Nice clocking indeed.
Also hitting 5Ghz here too... takes a boat load of Vcore to do it though...
Yeah, that 6300 you got is a pretty solid chip. You've just gotta keep it decently cool and divert your eyes from the vCore while benching
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2012
I'm all for memory Ocing, though you peeps better get you're backup benching Os's in order. I've borked my benching Os's more times then I can count trying to get my sticks, fast and tight.Memory is where we could all learn the most, anyone can dump voltage into a cpu. I think we should consider it at some point this summer in the overclocktagon.
Too many changes at once can break it because data in the RAM will be corrupted. Small errors can be always corrected even without any ECC technology.
On Win7/8 it looks like:
1 system will boot and will pass benchmarks even though memory is generating errors
2 system will boot but will fail most more demanding tests, still will pass Spi 1M, pifast, wprime or other tests which barely base on memory speed
3 system will boot but all you will be able to do is CPU-Z screenshot
4 system will randomly boot and throw blue screens or "can't read memory in ... " error window ... still can make CPU-Z screenshots if you are quick enough
5 system will give you bluescreen while start , usually 50 or similar error code, depends from platform
6 system won't even start booting as memory errors could corrupt start files
WinXP is breaking much easier as there is no additional protection from OS side. It's also easier to boot at high clocks so it's better for max CPU-Z valid results.
On Win7/8 it looks like:
1 system will boot and will pass benchmarks even though memory is generating errors
2 system will boot but will fail most more demanding tests, still will pass Spi 1M, pifast, wprime or other tests which barely base on memory speed
3 system will boot but all you will be able to do is CPU-Z screenshot
4 system will randomly boot and throw blue screens or "can't read memory in ... " error window ... still can make CPU-Z screenshots if you are quick enough
5 system will give you bluescreen while start , usually 50 or similar error code, depends from platform
6 system won't even start booting as memory errors could corrupt start files
WinXP is breaking much easier as there is no additional protection from OS side. It's also easier to boot at high clocks so it's better for max CPU-Z valid results.
Last edited:
OP
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2012
- Thread Starter
- #78
I apologize guys, been a messed up few days and ready to start a **** storm at work. Well I didn't start it but I think I'm going to finish it, they're messing with my vacation time next week and that's not going to happen! I'll get something posted up today. I think with the set clocks that memory is going to be important regardless and maybe we can finish off the summer with some sort of memory race. Not a bad idea.
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2009
That sucks...... you got enough going on go get some quiet time. I know what it's like to have your down time messed with especially when you get so little nowadays.
