-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
P9411's are getting me about half the normal ppd.
- Thread starter don256us
- Start date
I'm not sure if drivers could make that much of a difference, i only wish i had more time to test it out. 
)
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2015
What Driver Version are you using???
For me, every time I try HFM.net to check on my GPU's I get a unknown slot. Just like you have in your picture, mine will only show progress for my CPU's
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
At least you don't get core 15 WU's.
Woke up at 3 am to massive coil whine, like a high pitch alarm from my 780.
Finally fell back asleep only to wake up to see that the 780 picked up a core 15, with no QRB and tried folding it for a few hours only to have the client say unstable machine and dump it. Folds core 17's just fine...
Those 9411's aren't all that great yes, I remember those from my AMD folding days.
The science behind them is useful though so keep folding away!
Woke up at 3 am to massive coil whine, like a high pitch alarm from my 780.
Finally fell back asleep only to wake up to see that the 780 picked up a core 15, with no QRB and tried folding it for a few hours only to have the client say unstable machine and dump it. Folds core 17's just fine...
Those 9411's aren't all that great yes, I remember those from my AMD folding days.
The science behind them is useful though so keep folding away!
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2015
At least you don't get core 15 WU's.
Woke up at 3 am to massive coil whine, like a high pitch alarm from my 780.
Finally fell back asleep only to wake up to see that the 780 picked up a core 15, with no QRB and tried folding it for a few hours only to have the client say unstable machine and dump it. Folds core 17's just fine...
Those 9411's aren't all that great yes, I remember those from my AMD folding days.
The science behind them is useful though so keep folding away!
That's odd...
Like you, I remember ( back-in-the-day ) Nvidia using Core_15 and they released Core_16 for AMD Owners
If I remember correctly, as FAH moved forward, the older cards struggled with the new WU's and the new cards struggled with the old WU's but they would still complete them ( just slower than the card the WU was coded for ).I currently have Four (4) R9 280x's folding with driver 14.9. I was with the other team when AMD released 14.12 and everybody was talking about how it dropped PPD by 10~15K. I don't know if they have corrected that problem with 15.4 or 15.7 driver?????
I can't remember the version number of HFM.net that I was using the last time I had it installed
Like I said earlier, it would not see the GPU's WU's but it would keep track of the CPU's WU's.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2002
Yep their PPD sux. Also once you get them, you keep getting more as the series runs its course. I hope we don't get stuck for weeks on these.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2002
Several days so far. First one card got 'em, then the other card too. Now that server has the hots for me lol.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2015
I finely BROKE the cycle after 4 days
I change my AMD GPU setup to beta, I got 2 Core_18 WU's and 2 Core_21 WU's Now I can't get any WU's as it says that the assignment server is empty!!! I keep pinging 171.67.108.200:80 and .204:80 but if I look at the server status 171.67.108.52 is still up. This is the one that we get WU 9201 from Any body else have this problem???? If it's a no, I'll reinstall F@H to see if that fixes the problem
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2004
I finely BROKE the cycle after 4 days
Any body else have this problem???? If it's a no, I'll reinstall F@H to see if that fixes the problem
http://www.overclockers.com/forums/showthread.php/763118-No-available-WUs
All the AMD clients I have are idle. Over 4 machines. It isn't you.
Similar threads
