HFM linux question

torin3

Member

​

Joined

Dec 25, 2004

• Jun 17, 2015

• #1

I'm running a Zorin9 machine on my network. It is folding using the 7.4.4 client. I've set it up for remote access the same way as the windows machines on my network. However HFM.NET won't monitor it.

What am I missing?

The machine I have HFM on see the Zorin9 machine on the network. Shared folders are accessible. I've restarted HFM and the client a couple of times since setting it up.

 

ihrsetrdr

Señor Senior Member

​

Joined

May 17, 2005

Location

High Desert, Calif.

• Jun 19, 2015

• #2

I have wanted to respond, but I have only recent experience with fah client V7.x.x, and have only monitored the V6 client remotely with HFM, the last being maybe three years ago.

I have not heard much of Harlem's HFM.NET lately, but if I can find the current version download I'll experiment with the set up like yours, maybe we can figure it out.

 

OP

torin3

Member

​

Joined

Dec 25, 2004

• Jun 19, 2015

• Thread Starter
• #3

Thanks! I'm still kind of stumped. The way I've got it set up, it should work according to everything I've read on it.

 

ihrsetrdr

Señor Senior Member

​

Joined

May 17, 2005

Location

High Desert, Calif.

• Jun 19, 2015

• #4

I am only finding depreciated versions of HFM.NET:

https://code.google.com/p/hfm-net/downloads/list?can=1&q=

What version are people using with fah v7 in Linux?

 

H

HayesK

Member

​

Joined

Oct 11, 2008

• Jun 20, 2015

• #5

I have FahControl and HFM setup on two different windows machines, one XP and the other Vista, to monitor the remote FAH hosts. All the hosts are on my home network. Below are some screen shots of FahControl and HFM with the cfg settings for the remote FAH hosts. (The hosts showing in FahControl as "connecting" are not currently on-line).

 

OP

torin3

Member

​

Joined

Dec 25, 2004

• Jun 20, 2015

• Thread Starter
• #6

I found out what the problem was. Somehow the port got shifted from the default 36330 to 36328. When I set HFM to that, and rebooted, it started working!

I have no idea how the port number got changed, because I remember it being 36330 when originally setting it up on this machine.

Thanks ihrsetrdr & HayesK!

 

ihrsetrdr

Señor Senior Member

​

Joined

May 17, 2005

Location

High Desert, Calif.

• Jun 21, 2015

• #7

I didn't do much(of anything) but I'm glad you got it working.