Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
True, but negligible if 16x (1-2% depending on title game).
Thanks, i will read many of the stuff you posted, as soon as some spare time. Since you took the time revealing your view it would be kind reading it and just to make it clear, i do appreciate your input because you certainly got guts in the knowledge term.
However, some things i am not certain, so i made some points:
1. I dint call my "rambling" a book, that was you.
2. In my mind a Intel/AMD CPU (nowadays) is a hybrid approach, it is not RISC nor CISC. RISC can clock much higher. True CISC doesnt seem to exist because hybrid approach.
3. Intels plan stepping up the core count (modules) is nothing new, but so far it seems to lack execution, especially for consumer grade.
4. Skylake is mainly a feature set with many impressive stuff, the exact performance is not clear to me but it can clock ridiculously high, so my expectations was a net 10% increase, if you say its 0%... ok... no problem to me.
5. Sure, i think your core 0 thing is valid, but only on the paper. It seems to lack execution, because system will lag.
6. Changing "unnoticed" settings looks like "bloatware" to me... adding technical stuff that does almost nothing but to suck performance. Good reason not to get yourself tricked by non required settings.
7. They do not run at 60 FPS STABLE unless its running at 720P native res. I would say 1/3 is 30 FPS cap, 1/3 is unlocked FPS means it may move between 30-50 FPS in most cases but only rarely reaching the 60 FPS cap. And probably less than 1/3 may be able to provide a framerate hitting the 60 FPS cap in a regular manner but instead they may become a new tradeoff known as 720P upscaling, means the rate of detail is much lower and clearly visible. It depends if a dev is chosing the performance, mixed approach or quality approach.
8. Skylake architecture: Do you think your car got same horsepower at a mountain compared to sea level? I just made a raw estimation. nothing more... it is impossible taking all the odds into account because in that term i may even have to add the aging of a CPU, because with every bit of age it will deplete aswell, it is unrealistic going into the details because it will fill a whole book.
9. Your imagination regarding my age is more or less true, i am some decade, a single decade and some year old. You can freely chose because time means nothing to me and just as i feel like... i switch between those years back and forth.
10. All the numbers are estimated numbers coming out of my mind, i want to proof that there is no CPU drawback because PC is not truly ahead, taking the higher demand into account and the slow/minor CPU improvements.
11. I have had enough of the blue pill already, so i chose to take some additional red pills, it is better for my health.
Thanks, i will read many of the stuff you posted, as soon as some spare time. Since you took the time revealing your view it would be kind reading it and just to make it clear, i do appreciate your input because you certainly got guts in the knowledge term.
However, some things i am not certain, so i made some points:
1. I dint call my "rambling" a book, that was you.
perceived thought
2. In my mind a Intel/AMD CPU (nowadays) is a hybrid approach, it is not RISC nor CISC. RISC can clock much higher. True CISC doesnt seem to exist because hybrid approach.
You are on the right track, but I'm not going to share now. I still have to digest all the gutsly knowledge after my one on one with Yale.
3. Intels plan stepping up the core count (modules) is nothing new, but so far it seems to lack execution, especially for consumer grade.
I didn't say anything about core count. Cores don't matter unless you can utilize them. With Win10, the OS will distribute instructions across all cores. This however has a limit, but can be dependent based on machine load and instructions.
4. Skylake is mainly a feature set with many impressive stuff, the exact performance is not clear to me but it can clock ridiculously high, so my expectations was a net 10% increase, if you say its 0%... ok... no problem to me.
Refer to [1]
5. Sure, i think your core 0 thing is valid, but only on the paper. It seems to lack execution, because system will lag.
It's not paper, its common knowledge.
And even more
one more
6. Changing "unnoticed" settings looks like "bloatware" to me... adding technical stuff that does almost nothing but to suck performance. Good reason not to get yourself tricked by non required settings.
?
7. They do not run at 60 FPS STABLE unless its running at 720P native res. I would say 1/3 is 30 FPS cap, 1/3 is unlocked FPS means it may move between 30-50 FPS in most cases but only rarely reaching the 60 FPS cap. And probably less than 1/3 may be able to provide a framerate hitting the 60 FPS cap in a regular manner but instead they may become a new tradeoff known as 720P upscaling, means the rate of detail is much lower and clearly visible. It depends if a dev is chosing the performance, mixed approach or quality approach.
Ok, well I'm going to say that sound right, but I'm going to look into it.
8. Skylake architecture: Do you think your car got same horsepower at a mountain compared to sea level? I just made a raw estimation. nothing more... it is impossible taking all the odds into account because in that term i may even have to add the aging of a CPU, because with every bit of age it will deplete aswell, it is unrealistic going into the details because it will fill a whole book.
This is by far, the most off point statement and counter argument. Please refer back to [1]
9. Your imagination regarding my age is more or less true, i am some decade, a single decade and some year old. You can freely chose because time means nothing to me and just as i feel like... i switch between those years back and forth.
please don't fall into the self identity bs that your generation so easily finds comforting.
10. All the numbers are estimated numbers coming out of my mind, i want to proof that there is no CPU drawback because PC is not truly ahead, taking the higher demand into account and the slow/minor CPU improvements.
Refer to [1].
11. I have had enough of the blue pill already, so i chose to take some additional red pills, it is better for my health.
1. Who is accepting it? Me not, but you say "widely accepted" so that means that the people in general are accepting it, those who actually got no clue, cool stuff. So, a few people of academic grade actually are telling the stuff and the others are usually not asking if right or wrong because it can't be wrong, its done by academic people after all. Finally, the sun is moving, so there is no way the distance can be "fix". In space, there is generally way to much theory involved, not a hard nailed and immovable science.
Too bad... but can i help you digesting it? I am somewhat a expert in digestion issues, unfortunately may not be teached in most of the universitys. Heck, i even know well educated people (universitys and alike) that eat microwave food all the time and they think there is nothing wrong with.
In my mind, i was trying to figure out a clear evidence that make sense to me. The general implementation of many external functions (memory controller, volt regulations in general, bus and bridge stuff) has already started very long ago, even AMD is constantly doing it, thus the die size surely has increased on both manufacturers. But the stuff that is rather new is the plan to increase core count, in my mind this is a module such any other part that can be pinned down as a "dedicated" part of the CPU. We may see 6-8 core instead of 4-6 cores soon for consumer grade CPUs, but i dunno what time it will be done. Core count can be useful, why not? But in term someone cant feed all the "mouths", then it will be of low use. Luckily the mouth-issue is not a big issue anymore on new OS and new game software, its all a matter of capable OS, capable engine and hopefully better coding from Intel/AMD (so it can be done hardware side, not software), but you should know it even better than i do, i dunno why you actually think that the core count doesnt matter.
Pointing at a certain generation looks like you consider yourself another (probably older) generation. But who did most of the issues happening on the world? I am still far to young for that and will probably never grow old enough, so it was probably mainly your generation, but i guess they may be gone soon. Ultimately, i dunno why you think that the age is a matter to humankind. In the old cultures, often a younger person was considered "higher in hierachy" because simply more wisdom. It was generally accepted and no one was trying to point at generations. Generations arnt the issue, everything that is happening is affecting all of us, and everyone will be responsible for. Generation isnt the question, the question is how we implement the hierachy and how we handle each others. Hierachy usually goes from inner to outer, lower to upper direction. Looking down at someone is a misdirection.9. Your imagination regarding my age is more or less true, i am some decade, a single decade and some year old. You can freely chose because time means nothing to me and just as i feel like... i switch between those years back and forth.
please don't fall into the self identity bs that your generation so easily finds comforting.
I dont care climate change, it is a thing brought up by wise people in order to distract from the real issue. The real issue is the massive waste we did to the planet, the waste is exorbitant and will soon be exceeding the wildest nightmare. We was pumping so much dirt into the environment that it may probably take thousand of years for a surface cleaning (without hidden dirt). Most of the innovations we did was done by producing massive amount of waste, every kind of waste, even your so called "esoteric waste" known as electromagnetic waves that has been increasing the past 10 years to astounding levels and it is proven fact that it is beyond healthy and is creating many issues to all life forms inlcuding humans. The climate change is just a thing in order to distract people i think, there is no proven fact that the change was done by human, but there is a proven fact that all the massive dirt was produced and caused by humans and we are already suffering the consequences, the particles can be found absolutly everywhere, inside every body too. But as long as our mind is loaded up with nonsense and as long as we are already overloaded we forget to target the real issue.
