Okay, now I'm wondering about the PSU vs gfx.
I've recently bought a used Radeon 280X from Gigabyte, one of the WindForce3 editions, the Battlefield one (
GV-R928XOC-3GD-GA). I've also replaced my mobo with the exact same model. Now I have no problems saving OC settings or any settings at all and booting, though the real OC headroom of this mobo is a different story and may well not be that big. But I have a problem with the gfx card:
I've specifically made sure that the extra power leads (6+8) are plugged in correctly. There is also no way the rated TDP of my system adds up to the rated 550W on the 12V line on my PSU. But the card seems to be very flimsy and fragile about going up from its idle 300 MHz GPU and 150 MHz mem clock. With various releases of AMD drivers that I've gone through, I've had problems like the card crashing
faster if I set the fans higher or downclocked the GPU.
In some cases the card goes on a race to 100C out of the blue, for no discernible reason, e.g. me sitting here on OCForums, reading walls of text, no HDD or CPU activity, no nothing. GPU fans go roaring, I launch HWMonitor and what the heck? 70C! During some of those situations the PCB feels cool to touch (it never ever really gets warm apart from the metal strip on the back).
In Furmark, the card card goes up by about 1C to 5C per second at a stable rate, depending on the settings, but it always go up, the temp won't stabilize. And I'm getting 9 fps in Furmark in 1920x1080 (AA off) in those drivers that don't make the card crash, whereas I saw it lunch at like 60 fps and crash with older drivers. I sometimes see the card forget itself with the newer drivers and produce 20-30 fps at start, before dropping to 9. For comparison, my old HD 4850 (+ Accelero) (also from Gigabyte) could do a stable 5 without a fuss about the temps. Windows Experience index is like only 0.2 points above the HD 4850, and I think actually 0.1 points below my now-dead GF460 (also from Gigabyte). This makes me think that the card is throttling heavily, although it does show the full clock (whatever it's current set at) in Furmark. But I'm pretty sure that the fps I'm seeing in 3D Mark (06) is below my old GF 460. Heck, it's not clearly above the HD4850 and might be below it.
I'm aware that new cards don't necessarily mop the floor with DirectX 9 games, but this thing is a seriously beefed-up well-specced high-end construction with plenty of everything (384 bits and all IIRC), not one of those lean-specced nVidia cards like the GF960 that might be lacking in hardware for some purposes. I should be seeing some improvement over the GF460 and the HD4850 in DirectX 9 — unless the clock gets throttled, I guess.
I could also understand some measure of throttling from a modern card working in an older PC with an older CPU (yes, I know it's slower than recommender), but not this kind of thing here. Not HW Monitor showing the card with 84C at 500 MHz GPU clock, which is below half of its factory setting, and 35% GPU usage.
Obviously crashing 2 seconds into a DX9 game's intro/menu animation (a 3D map zooming and rotating) is something I can't understand at all.
What does this sound to you guys like? I can't help thinking it looks like not enough power.
Case air flow may be poor, but case wings are both removed. System and CPU temps aren't bad at all.