- Thread Starter
- #41
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Internet bench marks, just trying to find out where my PC's scores.
- Thread starter wingman99
- Start date
It expands here fine currently, possibly something amiss with wingman's setup?I'll fix it better when I am on pc
EDIT: 4,224px × 1,080px
- Thread Starter
- #45
With your rig you have a top score, nobody even comes close, except a i5 6600k. I turned off speed step and it seems to be consistent, for sure i5 2500K scores higher with speed step off IE 11, I did five runs, 17153,17075,17059,17195,17010, speed step on 16791,16820,16879.
Anandtech Web Benchmarks LINK: http://www.anandtech.com/show/9483/intel-skylake-review-6700k-6600k-ddr4-ddr3-ipc-6th-generation/11
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2004
Score 17819
i7 920 @ stock
8gigs ram
Chrome
WIN 10
i7 920 @ stock
8gigs ram
Chrome
WIN 10
Last edited:
Just spent a little time with Octane 2.0, looking mainly for the effect of SpeedStep.
18899 18880 18675 18770 18820 18860 SS on, so 1.6-3.3GHZ, Turbo 3.7.
16986 18568 18846 18864 18981 18835 SS off, so 3.3GHZ, Turbo 3.7.
18787 18458 18872 Security off, SS on.
18944 18907 19053 Security off, SS off.
W7x64 (fresh install 8 days ago), E3-1230v2 stock, Pale Moon x64 (current, private Beta).
All in the same Windows session, from 10~50 minutes uptime. SpeedStep on/off changed on the fly. New browser profile, cleaned after each run.
The major anomaly, run#1 line 2, is probably down to Kernel/high Priority activity from some Windows 'hidden' start up process/Task, it was the second run, ~15 minutes uptime. Some minor anomalies are probably also down to background/Kernel processes, most but not all runs had 2-3 small Kernel spikes showing in TaskMan.
Many of you will have SpeedStep lower than is possible on my Xeon, maybe as low as 600-800GHz, that extra drop/latency will likely show up more than in my tests.
18899 18880 18675 18770 18820 18860 SS on, so 1.6-3.3GHZ, Turbo 3.7.
16986 18568 18846 18864 18981 18835 SS off, so 3.3GHZ, Turbo 3.7.
18787 18458 18872 Security off, SS on.
18944 18907 19053 Security off, SS off.
W7x64 (fresh install 8 days ago), E3-1230v2 stock, Pale Moon x64 (current, private Beta).
All in the same Windows session, from 10~50 minutes uptime. SpeedStep on/off changed on the fly. New browser profile, cleaned after each run.
The major anomaly, run#1 line 2, is probably down to Kernel/high Priority activity from some Windows 'hidden' start up process/Task, it was the second run, ~15 minutes uptime. Some minor anomalies are probably also down to background/Kernel processes, most but not all runs had 2-3 small Kernel spikes showing in TaskMan.
Many of you will have SpeedStep lower than is possible on my Xeon, maybe as low as 600-800GHz, that extra drop/latency will likely show up more than in my tests.
- Thread Starter
- #48
I do agree about the kernel anomaly.
I don't know how Anandtech was able to get such good consistency in Octane 2.0 Compared to what I see here in this thread, he did say Chrome was the most constant browsers, I really don't believe that yet. Only 3 people tested with chrome once and we have three different results on three different PC's here as we should i5 2500-36736, i7 2600-30142, AMD FX 6300-20867, the fourth tested 3 runs with Chrome AMD Dual Opteron 875 score 6308-6774-6338. The rest of the results are IE and Firefox so far IIRC.
Here is Anandtech web CPU benchmarks comparison for skylake. http://www.anandtech.com/show/9483/intel-skylake-review-6700k-6600k-ddr4-ddr3-ipc-6th-generation/11
Last edited:
I really don't have the time right now to read and breakdown how the Anand tests were conducted, at a glance, it might only be single runs.
With the benches here that you noted, only the "3 runs with Chrome AMD Dual Opteron 875 score 6308-6774-6338." can really be used as a comparison for anything - but, as with most 'amateur' benchmarks, they're probably rushed, thus the spike in 2 (or is it depressions in 1+3?). Note that I didn't begin until ~10 minutes uptime, even then, my biggest 'anomaly' cropped up in the 2nd test, ~15 minutes uptime.
With the benches here that you noted, only the "3 runs with Chrome AMD Dual Opteron 875 score 6308-6774-6338." can really be used as a comparison for anything - but, as with most 'amateur' benchmarks, they're probably rushed, thus the spike in 2 (or is it depressions in 1+3?). Note that I didn't begin until ~10 minutes uptime, even then, my biggest 'anomaly' cropped up in the 2nd test, ~15 minutes uptime.
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2014
That was my final run today ^.
I've tried it on a new install of windows on firefox, waterfox, IE and chrome. All are about the same, somewhere about 40000 - 44000. Except IE was way lower like around 25000 for the score.
I thought maybe it was the ramdisk making the score better but no ramdisk on this install of windows.
Installed on RAID0 for both screenshots.
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2013
- Location
- Southwest Michigan
rig in my sig scored
Chrome: 37,889
Edge: 38,196
Firefox: 28,393
IE 11: 18,266 with an error
Chrome: 37,889
Edge: 38,196
Firefox: 28,393
IE 11: 18,266 with an error
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2004
Chrome 4670 @ 4.5
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
Win7 Ultimate x64
Chromium x64 49.0.2598.0
Similar threads
