-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
(Potential) Pascal 3dMark 11 benchmarks leaked...
- Thread starter EarthDog
- Start date
- Joined
- May 29, 2005
Not bad, if the article is about right stating that the performance is approximately equal to the N-1 ratio that nVidia (and AMD) have been holding that's a bit disappointing assuming the card performing akin to a 980ti is the normal '1080' (or whatever they will call it) and so forth. Was hoping for a bigger break through, but time will tell when it comes to launch and updated drivers/etc.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
- Location
- Central US
I have to wonder....why would they use 3D Mark 11? And then leak such pedestrian scores? I don't see anything there at all impressive.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
- Location
- Central US
Very little on 11. Vantage is where clock speed comes into play in a big way. But....nobody really uses that anymore either.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
- Location
- Central US
lol, yeah. I only really look at the graphics scores. Overall scores mean very little in the grand scheme of things. IMHO, anyway.
Low results. Something between GTX960 and GTX970. Anyway what's the point to have 8GB memory on so slow graphics ...
In 3D tests of 3DM11/13 and Vantage CPU performance counts but it's based on single threaded operations so higher frequency is affecting graphics score while more cores not really. Combined and physics tests are using more cores.
In 3D tests of 3DM11/13 and Vantage CPU performance counts but it's based on single threaded operations so higher frequency is affecting graphics score while more cores not really. Combined and physics tests are using more cores.
Similar threads
