• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

SOLVED The SATAEXPRESS connector supports one SATA Express device or two SATA devices

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

c627627

c(n*199780) Senior Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2002
My Skylake Asus Z-170A manual states that:
The SATAEXPRESS connector can support one SATA Express device or two SATA devices.


What is a SATAEXPRESS drive? Links?
Does that mean that two can be connected but would both function at SATA speeds?
Or does it mean if you connect one then the other connector slot would not be functioning?

What is the real life difference in speeds?





SATAEXPRESS.png

I sure don't want either me or my system to get left behind!
:D

By the way what is that third connector ↑ for, next to the SATAEXPRESS connectors?
 
Last edited:
Ya my Maximus 8 Hero has a SATAe connector too, don't seem to see any SATAe devices on the market yet though...
 
Okay so this does not exist yet but motherboards have connectors ready for them when they do come out?

Poster above linked to a mechanical drive, is this supposed to make mechanical drives faster?
How does it affect SSDs?
 
it uses the faster pcie lanes instead of the sata lanes so the data moves around the board faster so I assume you can use a faster device (ssd or hdd) with that connector.


from wiki something or other.

The choice of PCI Express also enables scaling up the performance of SATA Express interface by using multiple lanes and different versions of PCI Express. In more detail, using two PCI Express 2.0 lanes provides a total bandwidth of 1 GB/s (2 × 5 GT/s raw data rate and 8b/10b encoding, equating to effective 1000 MB/s), while using two PCI Express 3.0 lanes provides close to 2 GB/s (2 × 8 GT/s raw data rate and 128b/130b encoding, equating to effective 1969 MB/s).[3][7] In comparison, the 6 Gbit/s raw bandwidth of SATA 3.0 equates effectively to 0.6 GB/s due to the overhead introduced by 8b/10b encoding.


here is some at anandtech, if you understand this stuff would you be so kind as to explain it to me, all I get from it is it makes the data transfers go from zoom to ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMM.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7843/testing-sata-express-with-asus/4
 
Last edited:
So where does SATAEXPRESS fit in the age of M.2 drives?
 
Anyone have a good link they know of about a primer on this topic?
It's clearly the same interface as a SATA connector.
 
Thank you kindly Lutawicasa.

Here's a two picture answer on why only one SATAEXPRESS (instead of two SATA) can be used:


sataexpresscable1.jpg

sataexpresscable2.jpg
 
Okay so this does not exist yet but motherboards have connectors ready for them when they do come out?

Chicken and egg? A new drive interface does no good if there are no devices or motherboard support. In this case motherboard makers provided support but I can find no drives that use it. It looks like NVMe is the direction that drive manufacturers are going and I'd be very surprised if any SATAe devices came out now.

It looks like the connector was designed to support two regular SATA devices so it's not a total waste if true.
 
I am using it currently to connect two SATA devices.
The main source of confusion was not knowing that SATAEXPRESS is simple to explain: it just physically uses two SATA-compatible ports, (on boards that have SATAEXPRESS) - that's all.
 
It also doubles the bandwidth of a single SATA port. Which is mainly it's point (luta's link does say that) prior to m.2/nvme/pcie based drives. It just never really seemed to take off.
 
M2 vs sataexpress numbers?
My motherboard has m2 and it is a quantum leap over sata.
 
So m2 is twice as fast...
Thanks for that, EarthDog!
 
SATA Express is just the connector. The actual protocol of the connected drive can be either SATA or NVMe. It is 2 SATA lanes plus 2 PCIe lanes, so with SATA 3 (2x 600 MBps) and PCIe 3 (2x 1 GBps), theoretically around 3.2 GBps if it were able to use both interfaces at once. Kind of a misnomer, though. With three connections like that, I wouldn't call it serial :)
 
Last edited:
Back