With 4 thread Pentium it will be hard to convince some of the budget users who are used to Intel. This is way too late but good move from Intel side. Next thing is that most users who wanted new CPU already got it with KL premiere or before as SL was also really popular. I don't think that most of those users now move to AMD.
Personally I wait only for 8 cores+ but I wish to know real performance before I buy it.
Even if AMD will match Intel's performance core to core then I see it like this:
~4 cores = can be good option if anyone is building budget PC but if anyone already has 4 thread CPU like i3 from last 1-2 Intel gen then I'm not sure if it has any point
~6 cores = can be good option as a new build but if anyone has 4-6 core CPU from last 2-3 Intel generations then it's waste of money
~8 cores = good option if it's for a new build but if anyone has 6 cores+ from Intel then it's waste of money
AMD's delays with premieres caused one big problem for them. Average PC is replaced every ~3 years. Since AMD had nothing to offer for last years and many computers were replaced in last 1-2 years then they won't sell as many CPUs as they could in this year.
I can be wrong but I just can't see AMD in anything out of gaming/enthusiast build right now. If they prove that general platform performance and available features work as good as on Intel ( including stability and durability ) then they will slowly gain new users.
Personally I wait only for 8 cores+ but I wish to know real performance before I buy it.
Even if AMD will match Intel's performance core to core then I see it like this:
~4 cores = can be good option if anyone is building budget PC but if anyone already has 4 thread CPU like i3 from last 1-2 Intel gen then I'm not sure if it has any point
~6 cores = can be good option as a new build but if anyone has 4-6 core CPU from last 2-3 Intel generations then it's waste of money
~8 cores = good option if it's for a new build but if anyone has 6 cores+ from Intel then it's waste of money
AMD's delays with premieres caused one big problem for them. Average PC is replaced every ~3 years. Since AMD had nothing to offer for last years and many computers were replaced in last 1-2 years then they won't sell as many CPUs as they could in this year.
I can be wrong but I just can't see AMD in anything out of gaming/enthusiast build right now. If they prove that general platform performance and available features work as good as on Intel ( including stability and durability ) then they will slowly gain new users.