Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
And that's synthetic... not gaming...
Could be more, could be less...
Would be even more with a faster GPU too, just a thought.I did these tests on my machine (top) and my son's (bottom) with the same 1070. It isn't nearly as bad as you would think. I lose 6% to an 6700K clocked at 4.6GHz.
EVGA GTX 1070 SC
GA-X58A-UD7 (Rev. 1.0)
X5660 @ 4.2GHz ($50 CPU on eBay)
16GB DDR3-2400
Firestrike 14,820
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11940745
EVGA GTX 1070 SC
GA-Z170X-Gaming 7
i7-6700K @ 4.6GHz
16GB Ripjaws DDR4-2400
Firestrike 15,710
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11910054
Would be even more with a faster GPU too, just a thought.
In the video I posted the thing that struck me was that the overall FPS weren't that far apart. On the surface the older CPU's look to be good, however when you look at the frametime graph on the right side, there were definitely some spikes that could (will?) show up during game play as stutter.
View attachment 189815
I did these tests on my machine (top) and my son's (bottom) with the same 1070. It isn't nearly as bad as you would think. I lose 6% to an 6700K clocked at 4.6GHz.
EVGA GTX 1070 SC
GA-X58A-UD7 (Rev. 1.0)
X5660 @ 4.2GHz ($50 CPU on eBay)
16GB DDR3-2400
Firestrike 14,820
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11940745
EVGA GTX 1070 SC
GA-Z170X-Gaming 7
i7-6700K @ 4.6GHz
16GB Ripjaws DDR4-2400
Firestrike 15,710
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11910054
to support this here is my 6850k w/1080ti vs x5660@ 4200mhz w/1080ti
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/1984108/spy/1936636
and all system my x5660 @4200 /w1080ti my 6850k /w1080tiu and mister deadsmiley result w/1070 in a 4 part compare
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/11910054/fs/12983684/fs/12910871/fs/11940745
before saying a 10 years old system is bad ... well yeah its old but nothing as changed much really ... and runing a 1080ti on gen2 pcie is JUST FINE!
should inform people enough
Good work!