Notices

Overclockers Forums > Hardware > Video Cards > AMD (ATI) GPUs
AMD (ATI) GPUs
Forum Jump

[O/C]Official AMD Radeon HD 6850/6870 Performance Specs

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe Search this Thread
 
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-21-10, 10:54 PM Thread Starter   #1
Overclockers.com

 
Overclockers.com's Avatar 

Join Date: Nov 1998

 
[O/C]Official AMD Radeon HD 6850/6870 Performance Specs


Architecture, specifications, and design highlights for the AMD Radeon HD 6850 and Radeon HD 6870 - this is what everyone has been waiting for. While many sites are publishing exhaustive dissertations spanning many pages, we're looking to quickly bring out the essentials of what you need to know. The time for guesswork regarding AMD's 6000 series graphics cards has come to an end and benchmarks are publishing at many sites as you read this. In theabsence of solid facts alongside a plethora of supposed "leaks", the buildup to the release of the AMD 6000 series was fed from a consistent diet of ...

... Return to article to continue reading.

Last edited by I.M.O.G.; 10-21-10 at 10:59 PM.
Overclockers.com is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-21-10, 11:02 PM   #2
ratbuddy
Member

 
ratbuddy's Avatar 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hartford, CT

 
Hmm, let's hope the OC review includes an overclocked 460 vs OC'd 68XX cards. Haven't seen any reviews do that yet...

__________________
HTPC - 2500k - 212+ - GA-Z68MX-UD2H-B3 - 2x4GB G.Skill DDR3-1600 - Vertex 2 90GB, Spinpoint F3 1TB w/M4 64GB ISRT Cache - Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB - Silverstone LC10B-E - Corsair RM550

-----
Main - X3 450 - ASRock A790GMH/128M 790GX - 2x2GB G.Skill 4-4-4-12 - 2xWD Green 1TB - Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB - Silverstone TJ08 - Corsair CX400W

Nothin' up my sleeve..
ratbuddy is offline Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 07:43 AM   #3
hokiealumnus
Water Cooled Moderator
Overclockers.com Lead Editor

 
hokiealumnus's Avatar 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC

 
Unfortunately not. If I had one, I'd compare them...but I don't. Got one you want to send me temporarily?

__________________

Enjoy benchmarks? Join the benching team! | New to water cooling? Read the Beginner's Guide to Water Cooling Your PC.

xsuperbgx - "As a wise man once said: "Less talky. More clocky."" | cyberfish - "When overclocked, it's undefined behavior."
I.M.O.G. - "Vaseline on Ivy Bridge is a bad idea. But not so bad of an idea that it can't be fixed with a torpedo heater, a dishwasher, an oven, and a few hours. "

\m/ OverClockers mATX L33T Club \m/ - Join Now! - My mITX Build
hokiealumnus is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 10:08 AM   #4
ratbuddy
Member

 
ratbuddy's Avatar 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hartford, CT

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hokiealumnus View Post
Unfortunately not. If I had one, I'd compare them...but I don't. Got one you want to send me temporarily?
Just the one I'm using, I'm sure Brolloks or one of the other cardaholics does though

__________________
HTPC - 2500k - 212+ - GA-Z68MX-UD2H-B3 - 2x4GB G.Skill DDR3-1600 - Vertex 2 90GB, Spinpoint F3 1TB w/M4 64GB ISRT Cache - Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB - Silverstone LC10B-E - Corsair RM550

-----
Main - X3 450 - ASRock A790GMH/128M 790GX - 2x2GB G.Skill 4-4-4-12 - 2xWD Green 1TB - Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB - Silverstone TJ08 - Corsair CX400W

Nothin' up my sleeve..
ratbuddy is offline Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 10:37 AM   #5
Marshmallow64
Member

 
Marshmallow64's Avatar 

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: California

 
From what I am seeing they are performing worse than the 470. Strange numbering system.

__________________
:: Gaming Desktop ::
CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T @ 3.9 Ghz 1.4v | MOBO: MSI 790FX-GD70 AM3
GPU: EVGA GeForce GTX 570 (732/1464/1900) | RAM: 4 GB G-Skill DDR3 1600
SSD: OCZ Vertex 120 GB | HD1: WD Black 640 GB | HD2: WD Black 2 TB
SC: Xfi Titanium Fatal1ty | PSU: Corsair HX 620 W
KB: Saitek Eclipse | MOUSE: Logitech MX 518
CASE: Antec 1200 | OS: Windows 7 x64
:: Laptop ::
MOD: Macbook Pro 13 2011 | CPU: Intel Core i5 @ 2.3 Ghz
RAM: 4 GB DDR3 1333 | OS: OS X Lion 10.7.2
Marshmallow64 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 10:47 AM   #6
EarthDog
Researches Meritless
LIES for the Front
Page and Super Mutterator

Overclockers.com Editor


 
EarthDog's Avatar 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Stuck in Maryland...

 
Whats the point of reviewing it like that (460 vs 6870 or even 6850)? From the already published reviews, it spanks it across the board. The only difference would be overclocking headroom (which I believe what you may be getting at) and the 6870 being clocked so high, it may not have much headroom. A better comparison, b/c of performance and pricing (now) would be the 470 and overclock those?

__________________

"We have more information and more ways of accessing it than ever, yet seem increasingly less inclined to do so."- Michael Wilbon
EarthDog is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 11:15 AM   #7
MattNo5ss
5up3r m0d3r4t0r
Overclockers.com Editor


 
MattNo5ss's Avatar 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: AL

 
It looks like the 6870 and the GTX460 1GB have almost the EXACT same specs, except for the stock clocks. so, I would bet you have to get the GTX460 1GB to the same clocks as the 6870 for them to be roughly equal in performance. Which I doubt could happen, especially once the 6870 is OCed. This assumption is based on the specs, not actual benchmarks though...

Code:
HD6870

Max Power Draw:         151 W
Noise Level:            Moderate
Framebuffer:            1024 MB
Memory Type:            GDDR5
Memory Bus Type:        64x4 (256 bit)
DirectX Compliance:     11.0
OpenGL Compliance:      3.2
PS/VS Version:          5.0/5.0
Process:                40 nm
Fragment Pipelines:     1120
Vertex Pipelines:       0
Texture Units:          56
Raster Operators        32

GTX460 1GB

Max Power Draw:        160 W
Noise Level:           Quiet
Framebuffer:           1024 MB
Memory Type:           GDDR5
Memory Bus Type:       64x4 (256 bit)
DirectX Compliance:    11.0
OpenGL Compliance:     3.2
PS/VS Version:         5.0/5.0
Process:               40 nm
Fragment Pipelines:    336
Vertex Pipelines:      336
Texture Units:         56
Raster Operators       32

"At the same clocks" Comparison

HD6870                                           GTX460 1GB

Core Clock:           900 MHz                    900 MHz        
Memory Clock:         2100 MHz (4200 DDR)        2100 MHz (4200 DDR)
Memory Bandwidth:     134.4 GB/sec               134.4 GB/sec
Shader Operations:    1008000 MOperations/sec    302400 MOperations/sec
Pixel Fill Rate:      28800 MPixels/sec          28800 MPixels/sec
Texture Fill Rate:    50400 MTexels/sec          50400 MTexels/sec
Vertex Operations:    0 MVertices/sec            75600  MVertices/sec

__________________
i7 3770K | ASUS Maximus V Gene | 4x4GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 | EVGA GTX780 SC ACX | 256GB OCZ Vertex 4 | SeaSonic SS-1000XP

My Overclockers.com Articles | HWBot Profile | Heatware (98-0-0)

Projects: Copper-Framed, MDF Station | PVC-Framed, MDF Station | Custom Cascade Cart/Case | Untitled TJ07 Build
MattNo5ss is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 03:04 PM   #8
Nathan54AB
New Member



Join Date: Oct 2010

 
Am I the only one whose noticed that specs on the 6850/6870 are actually lower than that of the 5850/5870?
Nathan54AB is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 03:07 PM   #9
I.M.O.G.
Glorious Leader

 
I.M.O.G.'s Avatar 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rootstown, OH

10 Year Badge
 
Well, thats the optimizations and part of the whole shebang with "doing more with less".

Some specs are higher, but ya, a lot of the performance comes from some design optimizations of the architecture.

__________________
The OC Forums Way
We are a team. We are a community. We are a fellowship made strong by mutual respect and shared dedication to the task of enriching all who come here.
The OC Forums Thank You Thread
Put your computer to work for our OC Forum Teams!
Try out our POST TEMPLATES, they save you time answering common questions!

I spend half my money on CPUs, GPUs, and Liquid Nitrogen. The other half I waste.
I.M.O.G. is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 03:14 PM   #10
doz
Member



Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV

10 Year Badge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan54AB View Post
Am I the only one whose noticed that specs on the 6850/6870 are actually lower than that of the 5850/5870?
Because the 6850/6870 are the successors to the 5750/5770. There is going to be a 6950/6970 that will replace the current 5850/5870.

In other words, if you are looking to buy a 5850, you should just get the 6870 as they are about the same price but better performance/newer card. Same w/ 5770, just buy a 6850 (which will edge out the 5770 as the 6850 is more onpar w/ a 5830).

__________________
Asus P8P67
Intel i7-2600k @ 4.9ghz
GSkill Ripjaws 8gb 1600mhz c8
EVGA GTX780 ACX 1228//1650
OCZ Agility 2 240gb, Corsair Force 3 180gb, (2)WD 1tb Black
HAF 932w/ Corsair HX750
Heat

Last edited by doz; 10-22-10 at 03:30 PM.
doz is offline Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 03:16 PM   #11
deathman20
High Speed Senior

 
deathman20's Avatar 

Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Where the Cheese Heads Live

10 Year Badge
 
And to wait and see what the full size cores will do, I can't wait. If the shaders are really powering it that much we'd see roughly a 42% increase in oomph. Might just have to wait and see how the new ones fair before jumping on this... safer then sorry besides its not like I said I was going to get a 5850 earlier this year and still sitting on my GTX285.

__________________
-=The Gamer=-
MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) | i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz | 1.3875V | 28C Idle / 65C Load (LinX)
8Gig G.Skill Ripjaw PC3-12800 9-9-9-24 @ 1600Mhz w/ 1.5V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
Sapphire 7950 VaporX 1150/1500 w/ 1.2V/1.5V | 32C Idle / 64C Load | 2x 128GB Crucial M4 SSD's / 512GB Samsung 840 Pro
BitFenix Shinobi Window Case | SilverStone DA750 | Dell 2405FPW 24" Screen
-=The Server=-
Synology DS1511+ | Dual Core 1.8Ghz CPU | 30C Idle / 38C Load
3 Gig PC2-6400 | 4x Samsung F4 2TB Raid5 | 1x Samsung F4 2TB
Heat
deathman20 is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 03:36 PM   #12
Nathan54AB
New Member



Join Date: Oct 2010

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by doz View Post
Because the 6850/6870 are the successors to the 5750/5770. There is going to be a 6950/6970 that will replace the current 5850/5870.

In other words, if you are looking to buy a 5850, you should just get the 6870 as they are about the same price but better performance/newer card. Same w/ 5770, just buy a 6950 (which will edge out the 5770 as the 6950 is more onpar w/ a 5830).
This isn't making sense. 3870 < 4870 < 5870 right? Ok, so why isn't 5870 < 6870? Also, isn't the 5850 more powerful than the 5770? If that's the case, why would the 5770 be close to a 6950 and 5850 be close to 6870?

Quote:
Well, thats the optimizations and part of the whole shebang with "doing more with less".

Some specs are higher, but ya, a lot of the performance comes from some design optimizations of the architecture.
That makes more sense. So a 6870 will probably outclass a 5870?
Nathan54AB is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 03:37 PM   #13
ratbuddy
Member

 
ratbuddy's Avatar 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hartford, CT

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarthDog View Post
Whats the point of reviewing it like that (460 vs 6870 or even 6850)? From the already published reviews, it spanks it across the board. The only difference would be overclocking headroom (which I believe what you may be getting at) and the 6870 being clocked so high, it may not have much headroom.
That's exactly what I'm getting at. Last I looked, only one review published results for 6870 OCing and it was pretty dismal, 954 core vs 900 stock IIRC. If they're all clocking that bad, suddenly a $170ish 460 1GB doesn't look so bad considering they pretty much all do at least 850 vs 675 stock. Anand included an EVGA FTW version (850mhz core) in their review and it beats or matches the 6870 and GTX 470 in most (all?) games.

That's the real story most reviews are missing. Nvidia for whatever reason released the 460 pretty much underclocked by default. Throw in a full 384 shader version (bet the GF104 yields are good enough to do it today, if they wanted) and clock it up to 750 or so by default and the game changes. Of course, they'd completely gut GTX 470 sales, and that wouldn't be good for business. I think we'll see such a card as soon as 470 stock is gone, probably priced to match the 6870.

For now, I'm wondering why so many reviewers aren't OCing the 6870s. Maybe it was one of the conditions to be sent an early card..

__________________
HTPC - 2500k - 212+ - GA-Z68MX-UD2H-B3 - 2x4GB G.Skill DDR3-1600 - Vertex 2 90GB, Spinpoint F3 1TB w/M4 64GB ISRT Cache - Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB - Silverstone LC10B-E - Corsair RM550

-----
Main - X3 450 - ASRock A790GMH/128M 790GX - 2x2GB G.Skill 4-4-4-12 - 2xWD Green 1TB - Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB - Silverstone TJ08 - Corsair CX400W

Nothin' up my sleeve..
ratbuddy is offline Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 03:39 PM   #14
I.M.O.G.
Glorious Leader

 
I.M.O.G.'s Avatar 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rootstown, OH

10 Year Badge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan54AB View Post
This isn't making sense. 3870 < 4870 < 5870 right? Ok, so why isn't 5870 < 6870? Also, isn't the 5850 more powerful than the 5770? If that's the case, why would the 5770 be close to a 6950 and 5850 be close to 6870?
Check again, I pm'd him and he mentioned he got his numbers mixed up. It's corrected now - just a friday and a long day of work, it tends to do that to people.

Quote:
That makes more sense. So a 6870 will probably outclass a 5870?
Depends what you are looking at. For the most part, its going to trade punches.

__________________
The OC Forums Way
We are a team. We are a community. We are a fellowship made strong by mutual respect and shared dedication to the task of enriching all who come here.
The OC Forums Thank You Thread
Put your computer to work for our OC Forum Teams!
Try out our POST TEMPLATES, they save you time answering common questions!

I spend half my money on CPUs, GPUs, and Liquid Nitrogen. The other half I waste.

Last edited by I.M.O.G.; 10-22-10 at 03:48 PM.
I.M.O.G. is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Folding Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 03:46 PM   #15
hokiealumnus
Water Cooled Moderator
Overclockers.com Lead Editor

 
hokiealumnus's Avatar 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbuddy View Post
For now, I'm wondering why so many reviewers aren't OCing the 6870s. Maybe it was one of the conditions to be sent an early card..
Not as far as I know. We were supposed to have one pre-release, but there were extenuating circumstances that led to some not getting them on time. Ours is reported as on the way and there is no such restriction applied.

__________________

Enjoy benchmarks? Join the benching team! | New to water cooling? Read the Beginner's Guide to Water Cooling Your PC.

xsuperbgx - "As a wise man once said: "Less talky. More clocky."" | cyberfish - "When overclocked, it's undefined behavior."
I.M.O.G. - "Vaseline on Ivy Bridge is a bad idea. But not so bad of an idea that it can't be fixed with a torpedo heater, a dishwasher, an oven, and a few hours. "

\m/ OverClockers mATX L33T Club \m/ - Join Now! - My mITX Build
hokiealumnus is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 03:58 PM   #16
CharlieCS
Member

 
CharlieCS's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York Forum Points:4576

 
There are plenty of overclocked reviews.You really haven't looked at many besides guru3d it seems. Issues with some websites is that AMD used different VRM this time Chill instead of Volterra and software like MSI afterburner just doesn't support new voltage controller ,after it gets an update am sure 1GHz will be easy with some Vcore increase and these should reach 1GHz more consistently then say 5870 but 1050mhz is most I see these do 24/7 ,which is impressive considering it's still the same 40nm process.


Of course both 6850 and GTX460 have more headroom,but none of them will reach 6870 clocks And I expect a 850mhz gtx460 to consume more power as well.

__________________
Looking to buy AM3 Six Quad and Tri core chips. PM me.

http://heatware.com/eval.php?id=67820
CharlieCS is offline Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 04:09 PM   #17
ratbuddy
Member

 
ratbuddy's Avatar 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hartford, CT

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlieCS View Post
And I expect a 850mhz gtx460 to consume more power as well.
Not enough to require more power connectors. My stock 715mhz 460 is running 850 on 1.0v vs 0.987v stock and uses ~8 more watts at the wall than it does with stock clocks and volts.

__________________
HTPC - 2500k - 212+ - GA-Z68MX-UD2H-B3 - 2x4GB G.Skill DDR3-1600 - Vertex 2 90GB, Spinpoint F3 1TB w/M4 64GB ISRT Cache - Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB - Silverstone LC10B-E - Corsair RM550

-----
Main - X3 450 - ASRock A790GMH/128M 790GX - 2x2GB G.Skill 4-4-4-12 - 2xWD Green 1TB - Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB - Silverstone TJ08 - Corsair CX400W

Nothin' up my sleeve..
ratbuddy is offline Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 04:13 PM   #18
deathman20
High Speed Senior

 
deathman20's Avatar 

Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Where the Cheese Heads Live

10 Year Badge
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbuddy View Post
Not enough to require more power connectors. My stock 715mhz 460 is running 850 on 1.0v vs 0.987v stock and uses ~8 more watts at the wall than it does with stock clocks and volts.
8W? wow would of expected what 28W from a 18% increase in clock not a 5% increase (mind you off the base TDP of 160W)

__________________
-=The Gamer=-
MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) | i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz | 1.3875V | 28C Idle / 65C Load (LinX)
8Gig G.Skill Ripjaw PC3-12800 9-9-9-24 @ 1600Mhz w/ 1.5V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
Sapphire 7950 VaporX 1150/1500 w/ 1.2V/1.5V | 32C Idle / 64C Load | 2x 128GB Crucial M4 SSD's / 512GB Samsung 840 Pro
BitFenix Shinobi Window Case | SilverStone DA750 | Dell 2405FPW 24" Screen
-=The Server=-
Synology DS1511+ | Dual Core 1.8Ghz CPU | 30C Idle / 38C Load
3 Gig PC2-6400 | 4x Samsung F4 2TB Raid5 | 1x Samsung F4 2TB
Heat
deathman20 is offline Author Profile Benching Profile Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-22-10, 04:27 PM   #19
ratbuddy
Member

 
ratbuddy's Avatar 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hartford, CT

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by deathman20 View Post
8W? wow would of expected what 28W from a 18% increase in clock not a 5% increase (mind you off the base TDP of 160W)
I would have thought it would be higher too, but playing a very demanding Crysis mod, I only see ~230 at the wall. It's about 222 watts with stock GPU clocks, and ~130 gaming on the IGP.

By comparison, my old GTX 280 showed 330 at the wall playing the same mod with everything else in the system the same.

Anyway

__________________
HTPC - 2500k - 212+ - GA-Z68MX-UD2H-B3 - 2x4GB G.Skill DDR3-1600 - Vertex 2 90GB, Spinpoint F3 1TB w/M4 64GB ISRT Cache - Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB - Silverstone LC10B-E - Corsair RM550

-----
Main - X3 450 - ASRock A790GMH/128M 790GX - 2x2GB G.Skill 4-4-4-12 - 2xWD Green 1TB - Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB - Silverstone TJ08 - Corsair CX400W

Nothin' up my sleeve..
ratbuddy is offline Heatware Profile   QUOTE Thanks
Old 10-23-10, 06:23 AM   #20
Loo
Registered



Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Montenegro, Podgorica

 
This is why I love my 5870... It still does not fall into middle class with performance. I'll stick with my old idea, get another one 5870 for CF and enjoy that for 2011.
Loo is offline   QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


Overclockers Forums > Hardware > Video Cards > AMD (ATI) GPUs
AMD (ATI) GPUs
Forum Jump

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Mobile Skin
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
You can add these icons by updating your profile information to include your Heatware ID, Benching Profile ID or your Folding/SETI profile ID. Edit your profile!
X

Welcome to Overclockers.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this the best community on the Internet since 1998!


(4 digit year)

Why Join Us?

  • Share experience
  • Max out your hardware
  • Best forum members anywhere
  • Customized forum experience

Already a member?