• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

[O/C] Futuremark Release 3DMark 11

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
3Dmark11 needs a little massaging, :temper:

1. Does not recognize SLI with 260.99 drivers.
2. Does not recognize independent PhysX card.
3. Fubars Vantage......

Score for now....

P6034_score_small.png
 
Let me OC my cpu a bit more and my card a bit more so the 5870 doesn't look like a slouch (because it isn't a slouch).
 
What a polished terd that 580 is!!! :p

ANyhoo on the SLI issue...


How to enable SLI in 3DMark 2011:

First:
Add an SLI profile:


Profile "3DMark11"
ShowOn GeForce
ProfileType Application
Executable "3dmark11.exe"
Executable "3dmark11cmd.exe"
Executable "3dmark11demo.exe"
Executable "3dmark11workload1.exe"
Executable "3dmark11workload2.exe"
Setting ID_0x00a06946 = 0x084000f5
Setting ID_0x1033cec1 = 0x00000003
Setting ID_0x1033cec2 = 0x00000002
Setting ID_0x1033dcd2 = 0x00000004
Setting ID_0x1033dcd3 = 0x00000004
Setting ID_0x1095def8 = 0x02c00005
Setting ID_0x209746c1 = 0x04280001
Setting ID_0x20ebd7b8 = 0x00000020
EndProfile

Second:
go to "%LOCALAPPDATA%\Futuremark_Corporation\" and search for a file named:

user.config

Then open it in a text editor and search for the line:
Code:
<setting name="GpuCount" serializeAs="String">
<value>0</value>
Then change that 0 to 2 (or more if you have a 3 or 4 way SLI)

Don't change any other LINE!
Save it.

OR

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=2361872&postcount=34


Let me OC my cpu a bit more and my card a bit more so the 5870 doesn't look like a slouch (because it isn't a slouch).
Really, dont worry about overclocking the CPU...
 
Last edited:
GJ, futuremark! :thup:

When heaven is added to the list of scoring benches at the bot, I'll have to make some submissions.
 
Until then, drink milk.

EDIT: Grrrrrrr Woomack... killing me on that 470 man!!! THat 920 core is huge. Vmodded (bios and OCP)? water?
 
Last edited:
Why is Brolloks' score on par with OhEmGeeZ's score? Brolloks has a 4.5GHz Hex with a GTX580, even if CPU doesn't matter, that OCed GTX460 can't be on par with a GTX580...
 
Something is definitely messed up there. No way that's what his rig should be scoring. I was worried about drivers but those are the latest. Maybe try a reinstall?

EDIT - It's looking like he should be around 10,000. There appears to be a beta driver b/c high scorers are using a different version that's not FM approved.
 
Last edited:
My runs were on 260.99's... try those. I havent tried the newest.

EDIT: Woo was also on 260.99
 
Very nice.

Somewhat off-topic, but how long has FutureMark used such blantant branding? (The msi submersibles and antec jeeps, in this case.) Is the branding present in the paid licensed software as well?
 
Very nice.

Somewhat off-topic, but how long has FutureMark used such blantant branding? (The msi submersibles and antec jeeps, in this case.) Is the branding present in the paid licensed software as well?

Since vantage IIRC.

Coincidentally 06 was the last tolerable 3dmark.
 
Ed, I scored 7000 and change with my 580 and the 5640 at 4ghz. not sure what is going on with yours, but I would check your settings. has to be something going on
 
here is a screen of my run. but notice that that 19multi drops to 18 under load
 

Attachments

  • 3d11-580-7052.jpg
    3d11-580-7052.jpg
    482.3 KB · Views: 210
Very nice.

Somewhat off-topic, but how long has FutureMark used such blantant branding? (The msi submersibles and antec jeeps, in this case.) Is the branding present in the paid licensed software as well?

I had a copy of 3dmark05 (I think) and Sapphire logos are found throughout that one..
 
Let me OC my cpu a bit more and my card a bit more so the 5870 doesn't look like a slouch (because it isn't a slouch).

Not a slouch no, but when is comes to tessellation, which this test seems to evaluate heavily, our 5870's will fall behind. Time to sell and get a 69xx :)
 
ATi claims that heavy tesslation will never be used in real world applications, so they didn't optimize the architecture for tesslation, consequentially, they get blown out of the water on stuff like this where there actually is heavy tesslation.
 
Back