Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
In the staggeringly subjective "feel of windows" test, I like the 8150 better than my 2600K, it's second only to my 980x in the all time Bobnova's Favorite 24/7 Chip Ranking.
980x is going to be hard to beat.
In the staggeringly subjective "feel of windows" test, I like the 8150 better than my 2600K, it's second only to my 980x in the all time Bobnova's Favorite 24/7 Chip Ranking.
980x is going to be hard to beat.
But I don't multitask that much, so not sure if it's worth it for me... hmmmBeen using it a couple days now as my 24/7 box (I was afraid it'd murder my install, it didn't), and it definitely seems to be better. Running boinc with rosetta and LHC@H plus a GPU bitcoin miner and Pandora (especially pandora, I hate the new pandora, bring back flash!) I ran into slowdowns with the 2600k that haven't popped up with the 8150.
Why? No clue.
Pft, still in IT here however they don't replace stuff here till it breaks.... Which is good because they keep giving people this god aweful HP Thin Clients to run virtuals instead. Completely ***** for support work.
I think if my poor old Core2Duo dies, I'll build myself a rig and avoid telling anyone. Can never go to a virtual, too restrictive. Doesn't pay to be IT in govt.
http://arstechnica.com/business/new...marks-are-here-and-theyre-a-catastrophe.ars/1
Server benchmarks are in. Not looking good here either.
Bulldozer is a new innovation. Total rework of its core design. Also it is on a 32nm fab process new technology their for them atleast.
The point was a step in a certain direction. It had to be taken sometime and only time will tell if it was the right direction.