• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

FEATURED Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB DDR3-1600 CL9 - CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

Woomack

Benching Team Leader
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
I know that Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB DDR3-1600 is not a new memory kit but I've never tested one before on the OCF. Since I was installing one of these kits at work and I could test it then I thought I will add some results.

mem1.jpg

mem2e.jpg

mem3e.jpg

There is only one XMP profile as in most DDR3-1600 kits what is of course enough.
Results at XMP settings are below. There is also AIDA64 table with timings.

xmp1.jpg

xmp2.jpg

XMP is in 1.2 version so I assume it wasn't manufactured lately. However there is no info about manufacture date. Number on the sticker - 5.13 suggests there can be Hynix memory. Two 4GB modules are double sided so it's also a sign that tested memory isn't from any newer series as all manufacturers moved to higher density chips some time ago.
 
Last edited:
Overclocking results

1600 7-8-8-24 1N 1.65V

16001.jpg

16002.jpg


1866 9-9-9-24 1N 1.65V

18661.jpg

18662.jpg


2000 9-10-10-24 1N 1.65V


20001.jpg

20002.jpg

Performance is pretty good for an 1600 memory even before overclocking.

As always feel free to comment or ask questions.
 
Last edited:
:drool:

Makes me want to get my memory timings lower now :)
Though I doubt it will accept 7-8-8-24 :p
 
Here's some naughty pics of my CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 1.5V! These can also run at 7-7-7-21-1T @1333! Whether that's cool or not, I don't know!

NOT going to abuse my Dominators!! Too costly!!
 

Attachments

  • DSC00530.JPG
    DSC00530.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 10,011
  • DSC00531.JPG
    DSC00531.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 10,008
You could probably get tighter with those.

I got 7-7-7-24 with my crappy mix of Samsung and Elpida RAM ;)
 
I haven't seen much on DFR hynix. Most people skip from cfr to mfr. Is that because there are not many chips with revisions DFR through LFR, or is it just because there is no notable performance from those revisions? or both?
 
I think it's because we mainly see high end memory in reviews and overclockers pick higher series. Most these higher kits are on CFR or MFR. Older were also on BFR but most other IC are in cheaper kits.
I'm usually checking what IC is in every kit that I'm testing but sometimes when it's not mine and tape is really sticky or simply there is not much time then I'm not trying to take heatsink off.

Almost all available memory chips are designed for 1333 9-9-9 or 1600 11-11-11 ( there are also higher specs but almost no one is selling them and most are not in mass production ). Later memory manufacturers are checking them and after binning we have these magical high end kits so there is still a chance to get good overclocking memory in cheap series.
 
Back