Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
even crysis?
for $40 more, how much better would a 4890 or gtx275 be?
Oh THE HELL with crysis!
i mean difference in performance, as in for the extra $40 would it be a much better idea to get a gtx 275 instead of a gtx 260.
thank you, let a dead horse die already.
would the gtx 275 overclock as high as the 4890?
for $40 more, how much better would a 4890 or gtx275 be?
Notice all the muppets have to pipe in their own opinions about the games when it's purely a technical question. Leave it out!
In response to the technical question:
At that resolution a 4870 512MB version will struggle somewhat, so you're definitely on the right track by looking at the 1GB version of it to play Crysis and GTA IV. That or a GTX260 Core 216 will run them well. A thing to note about GTA IV however is that it also relies on a decent CPU, so you'll need a decent Quad Core C2D or i7 to get a good framerate, not just a good card.
The cards are pretty much equal in terms of performance, so it's really down to personal preference. Some guys have had issues with ATI cards, others have had issues with Nvidia cards.
Well based on the benchmarks, for $40 more it is worth it if you intend to overclock the 4890 as it will rival GTX285 speeds. At stock the GTX275 is a good bet and seems to just beat the 4890 at stock, but not in every game.
I'll leave you to work out the irony of your statement.
im probably going with the gtx 260 because form the benchmarks I've seen, the 260 core 216 is better than the 4870 and not much worse than the 280 .
I'm debating over what video card to get, either the gtx260 core 216 or the 4870 1GB. Will either one run games like cod4/5, fallout 3, gta 4, crysis etc. on all high settings on 1920 x 1080 resolution?