Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Kiriakos said:
You have wrong and right at the same time .
It is one Celery 1.4G review .
But the above quote is for one PIII S 1.4G
funnyperson1 said:cmon ol' man you know you want to be the first person with a PIII 2GHZ...
(dry ice )
davefred99 said:Hey ol.man I have dunb question, but How do you print the screen of your benchies. I use a third party program that leaves a tag on it. But I recall you tellin me once that I can do it in windows with some key strokes ??
P.S. I run winxp home edition
Kiriakos said:
This is what i get at 1610 Mhz
what is your curent speed ??
hey, o'cing is for fun, only...No way is it a price/performance set up. Is it $200.oo better than Cely 1.4
Whow... what a cool bus!!! It´s a pitty here I don´t see this board... I think it could be interesting for an upgrade... becouse pIV/XP + new good board + new 256-512mb good ram and maybe new heatsink would be much more... Here I just see the SOYO SY-7VBA-U 133 , asus TUSLC-2 some gigabyte and other crapies and INTELs mobos... I think none of them can do high fsb as yours isn´t it? I have pc166 ram (wich some tested it at 183mhz...) It would be an easy upgrade for me... But, no st6 hereol' man said:Actually its temps stayed under 40 deg. C at those speeds Volcano 7+. I have ran my ST6 to 190fsb. I had a little fun frying a 3com NIC though today with my crazy bus speeds.O well $10
got me a better one at best buy.
Actually I found 1.7GHz and 1.55v about the best for all around quietness and performence. I know with a little more juice I could at least post a screeny at 1800MHz.
The reason I kinda like 162fsb/1700MHz is because my ram can run 222 at those speeds. If I were to whip out the dry ice you would see 2GHz for sure.
The ST6 can hit high bus speeds while the TUSL2 cannot. I think this is why you don't see many TUSL2's OC'n chips to their max. I can hit my max.
I think having all the cache enabled instead of short traces in the core helps OC'n ability. Plus it really runs cooler.
The cel-t has some parts of the cache disabled. I think it is disabled cause it didn't work in the first place. Believe me I still like the cel-t but this chip takes the cake for quiet operation at high speeds.
Here are some temps of this chip at 1.4GHz/133fsb and 1.23v. Fans running at around 2000rpm and ambient at 72 deg. C
Rio71 said:
hey, o'cing is for fun, only...
whats wrong with my Math.
cel-t 1100@1562
Kiriakos said:
Did you send your Celery to school ?
Or you forgot to do that
Do not worry man this tests does not look to be any serius one .
I just take the chalenge because Ol man asked so .
Evilsizer said:how about some 3dmark2001se scores?
and what type of video cards are yall useing at high FSB's?
ol' man said:
At 1610MHz I get the same as you. This is not a FSB and cache dependant benchmark apparently. THE FPU of the celery and tualatin are going to be the same no matter FSB. The cache is going to be what is different.
Why did you not put up your Multimedia and mandel scores?
Kiriakos said:
Man i asked you first, to do for me some benchmarks at 1610 MHz ,and you had ignore me .
After this i stoped to play the game ..