OP
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Thread Starter
- #121
Yup. Which is nice, becasue in theory I should be using a bit less watts for the CPU now
Glad it worked out for you.
Thanks! I'm happy with the results too !
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
SOLVED NEED ADVICE ASAP!
- Thread starter Silver_Pharaoh
- Start date
Thanks! I'm happy with the results too !
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2002
- Location
- San Antonio, TX
Almost missed this. I think this is the first post of yours without an emoticon!
OP
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Thread Starter
- #123
I can fix that for you ;]
OP
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Thread Starter
- #124
A small update/question:
I've noticed 2 different reading for the Vcore in HWmonitor.
Which one is correct?
The one under the CPU or the one under the motherboard?
pretty large differences too, 1.14 vs 1.33
I've noticed 2 different reading for the Vcore in HWmonitor.
Which one is correct?
The one under the CPU or the one under the motherboard?
pretty large differences too, 1.14 vs 1.33
OP
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Thread Starter
- #126
Oooookay...
VID I assume is the voltage the CPU wants?
While Vcore is what it actually gets?
VID (Voltage identification)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage_regulator_module
as well you should. Weird to see VID not referring to stock voltage...
OP
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Thread Starter
- #131
I mean it works... Prime 95 stable 2 hours......
Then again, did you see the -12 volt rail?
Maybe VID is messed up like it too.
Similar threads
