q149 said:
My 9600 blows away an XT so it's not too far off.. XT cost about as much as well.. You said Nvidia can't keep up with ATI in dx9 games like Halo... Halo is unplayable at 1024x768 with almost everything turned off on my 9600.. on my 5900 it plays smoothly at 1152x864 with everything on.
How many FX and ATI cards do you have there testing the quality vs eacother? I would compare 2x AA on FX with 4x AA on ATI.. that's the first setting out of 5 on FX and 2 out of 3 on ATI.
I have done some extencive testing on both the 5900u and the 9700pro AIW (as listed in my rig).
first, compairing a top line card vs. a budget card is about as smart as thinking that ati needs better or higher settings in AA or AF to match nvidia settings.
do I realy need to start listing web sites that will make you eat your words? na, you wouldn't believe the pics anyway.
but I will talk alittle about some benchmarks and games that I've tested.....the results are almost the same as many sites.
aquamark:
starting with the 45.xx drivers, nVidia has drasticly lowered AF in your images. missing shadows, missing images, and even poorer AF is what you'll find with the 52.16 drivers. you'll need to set your AF to 8X just to match an ATI card at 2X when running this benchmark. (Oh, you'll need the pro ver for this to be done)
also, I know that the new 53.03 final drivers is out, but I've not had a chance to test yet.
Halo:
again, comparing a high end card vs. a budget card is dumb.
ofcorse, you'll get faster frame rate with a high end card.
again with the 5900u, missing images, as shown on many sites is confermed by me and my friend, with all drivers starting with 45.xx
with beta 53.03 and 52.16, my friend feals that it is no longer using 16bit PS2.0 shaders.....but now using 12bit or lower shaders. I can't test for this, other then what our eyes see.
there are times when things are questionable, but again I can't prove anything.
still, missing images are not excusable......hey, nVidia, if I'm suposed to see something in a game, I WANT TO SEE IT!!!!
edit: as for FPS, the 5900u will be better tested against the 9800pro, yet still, the 5900u only beat my 9700pro by a few frames.
most people who tested and listed there scores here, where beeten by my scores, and yes, they used a 5900nu or 5900u
MS flight sim 04:
all you need to do is look at some sites and search for pics of this game....you'll crall into a hole and cry.
when testing this game, I set it at 4X AA and 8X AF for both cards.
the ATI wins in AA, but it's not a huge win.
now with AF the 5900u looks like it's only using 2XAF.....why?
because, in many games nVidia, is lowering AF, without your knowladge....in order to raise FPS in the game.
UT03:
for the most part, despite what some people say, I feal the image quality is great for both IHVs....yet still, ati wins by just a hair with AA.
3dmark03:
nVidia will always try to cheat with this test...heck, they even admit it.
yet the only thing that I will say is...AA with the ATI is better then on the 5900u
not by much, but it was better.
get informed, and stop believing that testing a high end card vs a budget card is a fair comparison.
your thoughts will be respected more.
mica