• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

No.1 in the world -AMD Athlon64 FX57 Show Up !

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

windwithme

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
As I had a FX57 first test in early May, however, some people despise and doubt of my test.

Just as well, I’ve been this field for many years and also got some names in Taiwan, HK, and Chian.
I believe the friends who read my article over years won’t doubt of whether FX is fake or not.

Till now, I have been bearing for 1 month more.
I can post pics again and still the No.1 in the world.


Sharing…
AMD latest and highest clock product -- FX57


fx570lw.jpg


4600+ comparison test will be back soon.

To be continued

BIOS uses AUTO setting
All software display into the OS
fx5720zs.jpg


As I heard if CrystalCPUID’s Original Multiper shows 13, the other software show FX57 means fake.
It looks as if mine is not only print in FX57 Mark but also default is 200X14.
If I were not blind, I would say it is REAL FX57.

It’s boring step, but I still make the CPUZ verification.
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=23504

Test Configuration

AMD Athlon64 FX57
DFI nF4 LP Ultra-d
GSkill 1GBGH
Mixed Water Cooler

1.4G 3G 200X15 DDR400 2 2-2-5
Super PI 8M basic stability reached.
Great Air cooling performance has been reached the water cooling level.
3G is not the dream, I think.
3g6wr.jpg


Thanks for all who trust me.
 
hm, its actually 5minutes and 20 sec, in 8M.
it look nice, but for me the best thing is dual or multi-core cpu...
 
i must say im impressed, its nice to see (finally) a cpu that will push 3ghz without well, any hassle really.. should be nice to see what its capable of since its on the San Diego core.. 3.5maybe?, which would be what? 5000+? *shrugs*.. does anyone actually have a conversion table of PR ratings? ive always wanted to have one so i can work it out

Careface*
 
3G test
200X15 DDR400 2 2-2-5
PI 8M 5m20s
CPUMARK 386

300X10 DDR500 2 2-2-5
PI 8M 5m10s
CPUMARK 389

3g24ot.jpg
 
Last edited:
hmm i was just looking at CPUMark, and wondered what my cpu got on it.. i saw tehre was a CPUMark 2, wouldnt that be a more accurate bench than CPUMark 99? leet CPU in any event, got just over 2x the score as my 2.2ghz axp lol

Careface*
 
Test Configuration

AMD Athlon64 FX57
DFI nF4 LP Ultra-d
GSkill 1GBGH or 1GBFF
Mixed Water Cooler

3000Mhz


200X15 DDR400 2 2-2-5
PI 8M 5m20s
CPUMARK 386

300X10 DDR500 2 2-2-5
PI 8M 5m10s
CPUMARK 389

300X10 DDR600 2.5 3-3-7
PI 8M 5m08s
CPUMARK 389

3g39vc.jpg


the CPUZ verification.
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=23651
 
homer77 said:
nice, 300x10 :drool:


not to rain on the parade but 300x10 on air or water is common on even the old .13 fx55. Still it seems the FX57 has good potential.
 
Windwithme - as you know the "FX57" you had in May was not a true FX57 like you have now but a FX55 hard coded as a FX57 so that AMD could pre-check bios compatibility on existing mobos. That was the reason you didnt give a screenshot of the cpu whereas now you are.
 
Back