-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Official OC Forums SuperPi 1m scores thread (by CPU)
- Thread starter Bobnova
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Location
- under a heatsink
[*B]Dooms101[/b] - [*URL="http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1081522_dooms101_superpi_phenom_ii_x4_965_be_15sec_850ms"]15:850[*/URL] - AMD PhII 965BE @ 4.368 - DDR3-1664 (9-9-9-28), AIR
I was able to gain about a second after I optimized windows a bit... hopefully I'll get a run at like 4.43GHz or so... should give me even better results.
I was able to gain about a second after I optimized windows a bit... hopefully I'll get a run at like 4.43GHz or so... should give me even better results.
Last edited:
I suspect that AMD list will have a new face at the top in two weeks time.
Well I would have been at the top with my 555be at 13.978, but miah here just creamed me...
Damn
Impressive score.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Location
- under a heatsink
My 15.850 looks like crap compared to your 13.978... but I've been reading up on SuperPI today and I was doing it all wrong... wait for tonight! I bet I can take at least 2 maybe 3 seconds off mine! Mwuahahha!
What are you changing? I heard using XP helps, what else? I was still using win7 there.
It's raw clockspeed that helps the most. I was running 5ghz, you are only at not even 4.4ghz. But your voltage is still low, you got plenty of headroom if you got a decent cooler.
Also, I was at cas 8 VS your cas 9 with similar ram speeds.
It's raw clockspeed that helps the most. I was running 5ghz, you are only at not even 4.4ghz. But your voltage is still low, you got plenty of headroom if you got a decent cooler.
Also, I was at cas 8 VS your cas 9 with similar ram speeds.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Location
- under a heatsink
Well I actually dropped a second off the time just by doing a fresh install of Win7, set priority to real time, and disabling every service I could (better than ending processes which doesn't do much). I am gonna run it today at cas6 (hopefully) or cas7 and do a few other tweaks as well. I might also use a modified WinXP...
[*b]Hilight[/b] - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1080029_hilight_superpi_phenom_ii_x6_1090t_be_15sec_428ms[*/URL] - X6 1090T @ 4572Mhz - DDR3@866 9-9-9-24 1T (Air)
[*b]Hilight[/b]http://hwbot.org/community/submission/769235_hilight_superpi_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_8sec_109ms[*/URL] - E8600 @ 5608Mhz - DDR2@560 5-5-5 (SS)
Edit: Updated post
[*b]Hilight[/b]http://hwbot.org/community/submission/769235_hilight_superpi_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_8sec_109ms[*/URL] - E8600 @ 5608Mhz - DDR2@560 5-5-5 (SS)
Edit: Updated post
Attachments
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Location
- under a heatsink
[B]Dooms101[/b] - [URL="http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1082526_dooms101_pifast_phenom_ii_x4_965_be_15.31_sec?new=true"]15.313[/URL] - PhII 965BE 4.558Ghz - DDR3-1413Mhz (7-8-8-25) - Air
Mwwuaahahahah! And now I steal 6th place in the AMD section! Haha!
I disabled 2 cores with ACC, left one oc'd to ~4Ghz and oc'd the last core to 4.558Ghz hence the weird CPUz.
Mwwuaahahahah! And now I steal 6th place in the AMD section! Haha!
I disabled 2 cores with ACC, left one oc'd to ~4Ghz and oc'd the last core to 4.558Ghz hence the weird CPUz.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Location
- under a heatsink
Awwww Hilight you meet me =( And I was so happy. You managed about 200ms better than me and I was running only 17Mhz slower. The 1090T must be a much better chip =(
Good to meet you as well Dooms101 no- it was software tweaks that gave the better time---your time is pretty good for that speed-- I also had better memory speed
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Location
- under a heatsink
Do higher cpuNB speeds have any effect? HT Link? Mem speed and timings?
I am gonna try again tonight when it's cold again xD
I am gonna try again tonight when it's cold again xD
Yes absolutely. At the clocks you are running, go for atleast 2800mhz on the NB and 2200 on the HT. You'll probably have to increase the CPU nb voltage for that.
Tightest timings as possible is best for SPI.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Location
- under a heatsink
Well that's good to know... I was going for just all-out cpu speed.
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2009
- Location
- Illinois
Thuban is also a fast architecture. Albeit slightly, it is.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Location
- under a heatsink
I feel severely disadvantaged as my cpuNB can barely push 2720Mhz... I've been looking at the bot for runs with my setup at the same speed (+/- 20Mhz) and it seems like the ones getting better scores are running ~1800Mhz ram with 6-6-6-18-1T timings and 3000-3500 cpuNB speeds. Hmm... I don't think software tweaks alone can give me an advantage
Yea, it seems a lot of real good times are on machines with around 3100 nb speeds---and it is good to have your ram a little slower with tighter timings than a little faster with looser timings
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2003
- Location
- Middlesbrough
[*b]spiritedandy[/b] - [*URL=http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1082955_spiritedandy_superpi_core_i7_920_8sec_985ms[*/URL] - i7 920 @4595 Mhz DDR3 7-8-7-20 (Air)
