New Protein

gtsimmo · 07-23-02, 03:52 AM

Okay in a weird move Stanford has released two seperate proteins with the same name p145_1L2Yunf. One of them is worth 0.6 pts while the other is worth whopping 6 pts with a 20 day deadline!!! Now if your like my and use EM3 you will get some initial error reports when you get the bigger one, since it will expect it to fold alot faster. This protein has already cause quite a few confusions. So dont freak out thinking your CPU has slowed down when you see this new one.

http://folding.stanford.edu/psummary.html

rich99million · 07-23-02, 05:37 AM

145 p145_1L2Yunf 201 4 0.6 Description
146 p145_1L2Yunf 201 20 6 Description

I guess from looking at it the 20 point protein should be named p146_1L2Yunf seems odd for a 20 pointer to only have 201 atoms though.

If anyone gets one can you post rough frame times here please?

Rich

rich99million · 07-23-02, 05:47 AM

lol - brother just got one

it folds about 10 minutes per frame on a stock XP1800+

funny really cos he was saying yesterday he wanted a 6 pointer (after i'd told him the biggest you could get was 5)

Rich

NASsoccer · 07-23-02, 10:16 AM

from vijay on this:
yea, sorry. P146 got labeled as P145's. P146 is 6 points and takes 10x longer than P145 (0.6 points). Other than the labeling on the .xyz file (which doesn't have any internal meaning -- it's just there for people to see which WU they get), there is no problem. Sorry for the mixup.

vijay

so all that happened was it was labled wrong, oh well, as long is there isn't a problem i guess it is alright

FOLD ON
NAS

FoldingAddict · 07-23-02, 10:22 AM

NAS!!! Where are you getting all of this info?? I can't find it anywhere.

Arkaine23 · 07-23-02, 10:24 AM

Got one right now on my main rig. The client errored out and tried to send it at only 54 frames. I restarted the client and its going fine now... about 9 minutes/frame @ 1750.

NASsoccer · 07-23-02, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by verdufreak
NAS!!! Where are you getting all of this info?? I can't find it anywhere.

the community boards where the vijay and company hang out

FOLD ON
NAS

FoldingAddict · 07-23-02, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NASsoccer

the community boards where the vijay and company hang out

FOLD ON
NAS

I knew that!

Arkaine23 · 07-23-02, 10:33 AM

Team 32 even has a private room there where we can discuss secret strategy, but that's not the only non-public place we can chat.

However, because these are unofficial locations where O/C forums rules aren't strictly enforced, we can't post the information here. You'll have to PM one of the Team Leaders to get the details.

FoldingAddict · 07-23-02, 10:51 AM

Hehe talking to NAS Now.

chuckerants · 07-23-02, 12:06 PM

Damn, I thought there was a problem with my Unlocked Duron last night. It kept getting the big protein while my XP1800 kept getting the small one Grrr...

I lost at least 3 WU because of this.

portorock · 07-23-02, 12:12 PM

Anyway to fix the labeling prob or do we just have to wait for them to fix it? I'm ready to go, I have 2 on my 1800+ Dually and it's taking like 10 min/frame

FoldingAddict · 07-23-02, 12:26 PM

Grrr, I envision my PII 400 doing one frame every oh, half a day.

Rav · 07-23-02, 12:28 PM

Average 8.76 Min/frame on XP 1736 Mhz (proteinA was 8.53 min btw).

Also noticed:

- Dynamic steps required: 5000000

That seems like more than usual! Guess they are going for precision?

-Rav

new_novice · 07-23-02, 01:45 PM

takes 12.xx minutes on my main 1.4 Duron, and 196 Hours per Wu on my AMD K6 262.

Arkaine23 · 07-23-02, 05:20 PM

OK, now I've got 4 of these on my boxes at home. Every rig has one!!!

res0r9lm · 07-23-02, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gtsimmo
Okay in a weird move Stanford has released two seperate proteins with the same name p145_1L2Yunf. One of them is worth 0.6 pts while the other is worth whopping 6 pts with a 20 day deadline!!! Now if your like my and use EM3 you will get some initial error reports when you get the bigger one, since it will expect it to fold alot faster. This protein has already cause quite a few confusions. So dont freak out thinking your CPU has slowed down when you see this new one.

http://folding.stanford.edu/psummary.html

it was an error on stanfords part they have the wrong name they should be p146_1L2Yunf but some how it got crossed with p145_1L2Yunf don't worry from what I have been told even though it has the wrong name it will still give you the right amount of points you are suppose to get.

gtsimmo · 07-23-02, 07:26 PM

I just checked the link and it looks like they corrected the situation and it's been renamed p146_1L2Yunf

res0r9lm · 07-23-02, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gtsimmo
I just checked the link and it looks like they corrected the situation and it's been renamed p146_1L2Yunf

yea when I got home today it was already corrected on the site but they are still getting sent out as p145's still so if you have a p145 that takes 8-11 minutes per a frame it's a 6 pointer and if it only takes around a minute it's a .6 pointer thats the only way I know of telling them apart

diehrd · 07-23-02, 08:22 PM

I am folding the p-145 Protien and at stock onmy dual XP1800
I am running 11 minutes a frame ... Also folding a p-143 at 7 minutes a frame ....

07-23-02, 03:52 AM	Thread Starter #1
gtsimmo Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA	New Protein Okay in a weird move Stanford has released two seperate proteins with the same name p145_1L2Yunf. One of them is worth 0.6 pts while the other is worth whopping 6 pts with a 20 day deadline!!! Now if your like my and use EM3 you will get some initial error reports when you get the bigger one, since it will expect it to fold alot faster. This protein has already cause quite a few confusions. So dont freak out thinking your CPU has slowed down when you see this new one. http://folding.stanford.edu/psummary.html
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 05:37 AM	#2
rich99million Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: UK	145 p145_1L2Yunf 201 4 0.6 Description 146 p145_1L2Yunf 201 20 6 Description I guess from looking at it the 20 point protein should be named p146_1L2Yunf seems odd for a 20 pointer to only have 201 atoms though. If anyone gets one can you post rough frame times here please? Rich
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 05:47 AM	#3
rich99million Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: UK	lol - brother just got one it folds about 10 minutes per frame on a stock XP1800+ funny really cos he was saying yesterday he wanted a 6 pointer (after i'd told him the biggest you could get was 5) Rich
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 10:16 AM	#4
NASsoccer On a string I was held Senior Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: i live	from vijay on this: yea, sorry. P146 got labeled as P145's. P146 is 6 points and takes 10x longer than P145 (0.6 points). Other than the labeling on the .xyz file (which doesn't have any internal meaning -- it's just there for people to see which WU they get), there is no problem. Sorry for the mixup. vijay so all that happened was it was labled wrong, oh well, as long is there isn't a problem i guess it is alright FOLD ON NAS
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 10:22 AM	#5
FoldingAddict Intel Fanboy Join Date: May 2002 Location: Montgomery, AL	NAS!!! Where are you getting all of this info?? I can't find it anywhere. __________________ Standard CPUs: "Charlie" - Tyan S8812, 4xOpteron 6168 @ 1.9GHz, 4xHyper 212+, 16x2GB G.Skill DDR3 1333, Silverstone 1200 Watt PSU GPUs: 1x550 Ti @ Stock, 2x580 GTX @ 840 TEAM 32!
	QUOTE Thanks

New Protein

Internet Services

Website Development

Tech Hardware

07-23-02, 10:24 AM	#6
Arkaine23 Captain Random Senior Evil Genius Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Woodlands, Tx	new WU Got one right now on my main rig. The client errored out and tried to send it at only 54 frames. I restarted the client and its going fine now... about 9 minutes/frame @ 1750. __________________ Folding.for.team.32.as.OC3d! i5 3570 @ 4.5 \| 8GB \| SSD \| 5-disk Raid 0 \| 660 Ti +154 other/slower clients folding
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 10:33 AM	#9
Arkaine23 Captain Random Senior Evil Genius Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Woodlands, Tx	Folding Forums Team 32 even has a private room there where we can discuss secret strategy, but that's not the only non-public place we can chat. However, because these are unofficial locations where O/C forums rules aren't strictly enforced, we can't post the information here. You'll have to PM one of the Team Leaders to get the details. __________________ Folding.for.team.32.as.OC3d! i5 3570 @ 4.5 \| 8GB \| SSD \| 5-disk Raid 0 \| 660 Ti +154 other/slower clients folding
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 10:51 AM	#10
FoldingAddict Intel Fanboy Join Date: May 2002 Location: Montgomery, AL	Hehe talking to NAS Now. __________________ Standard CPUs: "Charlie" - Tyan S8812, 4xOpteron 6168 @ 1.9GHz, 4xHyper 212+, 16x2GB G.Skill DDR3 1333, Silverstone 1200 Watt PSU GPUs: 1x550 Ti @ Stock, 2x580 GTX @ 840 TEAM 32!
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 12:06 PM	#11
chuckerants Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Phoenix	Damn, I thought there was a problem with my Unlocked Duron last night. It kept getting the big protein while my XP1800 kept getting the small one Grrr... I lost at least 3 WU because of this. __________________ i7 920 D0 @ 3.8 @ 1.328v - Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R (rev. 1.0) - Prolimatech Megahalems push/pull - OCZ Gold 6GB RAM - HD6870 - Corsair TX750 - Antec 902 - Windows7 x64 Heatware
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 12:12 PM	#12
portorock Member Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Quantico, Va but am from Queens, NY	Anyway to fix the labeling prob or do we just have to wait for them to fix it? I'm ready to go, I have 2 on my 1800+ Dually and it's taking like 10 min/frame
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 12:26 PM	#13
FoldingAddict Intel Fanboy Join Date: May 2002 Location: Montgomery, AL	Grrr, I envision my PII 400 doing one frame every oh, half a day. __________________ Standard CPUs: "Charlie" - Tyan S8812, 4xOpteron 6168 @ 1.9GHz, 4xHyper 212+, 16x2GB G.Skill DDR3 1333, Silverstone 1200 Watt PSU GPUs: 1x550 Ti @ Stock, 2x580 GTX @ 840 TEAM 32!
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 12:28 PM	#14
Rav Member Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Philthadelphia	Average 8.76 Min/frame on XP 1736 Mhz (proteinA was 8.53 min btw). Also noticed: - Dynamic steps required: 5000000 That seems like more than usual! Guess they are going for precision? -Rav __________________ + Intel i860, i760, i530 + I kill threads like a mass-murderer
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 01:45 PM	#15
new_novice Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: san jose, CA	takes 12.xx minutes on my main 1.4 Duron, and 196 Hours per Wu on my AMD K6 262. __________________ Asus P5Q Deluxe Intel Q9550 @ 3.4 Ghz 4 Gbs Kingston 1066 Saphire 4780 1Gb version 1 Raid 0 for scrap (2) 1 Raid 1 for OS (2) 1 Raid 10 for data (6x)
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 05:20 PM	#16
Arkaine23 Captain Random Senior Evil Genius Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Woodlands, Tx	6 pointer OK, now I've got 4 of these on my boxes at home. Every rig has one!!! __________________ Folding.for.team.32.as.OC3d! i5 3570 @ 4.5 \| 8GB \| SSD \| 5-disk Raid 0 \| 660 Ti +154 other/slower clients folding
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 07:26 PM	Thread Starter #18
gtsimmo Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA	I just checked the link and it looks like they corrected the situation and it's been renamed p146_1L2Yunf
	QUOTE Thanks

07-23-02, 08:22 PM	#20
diehrd Senior SMP Gawd Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: NY	I am folding the p-145 Protien and at stock onmy dual XP1800 I am running 11 minutes a frame ... Also folding a p-143 at 7 minutes a frame .... __________________ .
	QUOTE Thanks

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search