- Joined
- Jan 11, 2002
- Location
- tOLEDO, OHIO, the heart of it all!
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
celly 2.0 new bang for the buck
- Thread starter jdmcnudgent
- Start date
jdmcnudgent said:these new celly 2 gig chips are seemingly to be the new bang for the buck. mine was $117.50 shipped and it is doing great, see sig, right now. you can see all the nice results here
where else are you gonna get a 1100mhz oc without barely trying???
Where did you get your chip at? Also what MB do you think would be good for this chip. My Asus P4B533 just blew out when i tried taking my 1.6a to 3.2ghz. So now im on the Asus p4s333 and need to MB and chip. Any suggestions? Great oc btw.
- Joined
- May 9, 2002
- Location
- Portland OR.
Just one word....Awesome!!!
OP
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2002
- Location
- tOLEDO, OHIO, the heart of it all!
- Thread Starter
- #6
Re: Re: celly 2.0 new bang for the buck
i got the chip at googlegear.com. but i think they will ALL do about the same. newegg has them for the same price, but google had second day shipping for $.50. i would say pair this chip with RDRAM to make up for the L2 cache, only 128 as opposed to 512, and even 256 would be great. my ddr is running at 408mhz, with laxed timings, but the box seems to be slow for crunching seti, im benching it right now. it is a great chip and a nice oc, and best of all, its stable as a rock. its running at this speed at 1.5 volts, and that is below default, as the c1 stepping is 1.525 volts, and that is at full load. i might get froggy tonight and wire wrap it for 1.7 volts, and see if i can stablize it at 3400-3500 range. i had it boot to 3200, but i had to hit +10% in the bios, and the board doesnt like that for some reason. its just a matter of time, and i really would like to see the max stable oc outta this chip.
thanks guys.Extol said:
i got the chip at googlegear.com. but i think they will ALL do about the same. newegg has them for the same price, but google had second day shipping for $.50. i would say pair this chip with RDRAM to make up for the L2 cache, only 128 as opposed to 512, and even 256 would be great. my ddr is running at 408mhz, with laxed timings, but the box seems to be slow for crunching seti, im benching it right now. it is a great chip and a nice oc, and best of all, its stable as a rock. its running at this speed at 1.5 volts, and that is below default, as the c1 stepping is 1.525 volts, and that is at full load. i might get froggy tonight and wire wrap it for 1.7 volts, and see if i can stablize it at 3400-3500 range. i had it boot to 3200, but i had to hit +10% in the bios, and the board doesnt like that for some reason. its just a matter of time, and i really would like to see the max stable oc outta this chip.
OP
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2002
- Location
- tOLEDO, OHIO, the heart of it all!
- Thread Starter
- #7
thanks, but that is JCviggen.krag said:
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2001
- Location
- Enn Jay
yea... i'm a little short on dough.. can only get a 900 celley that'll run at or close to 1200 (hopefully) great upgrade from 667 for 50 bucks
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2002
- Location
- Seattle, but im Estonian
seoul make sure to get at least a tualatin i dono if 900 were tualatin yet.. save up a lil if u can
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
How does your celly compare with your 1.8A JD?
OP
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2002
- Location
- tOLEDO, OHIO, the heart of it all!
- Thread Starter
- #11
at this speed, its crushing it, even it is crushing it at 2.4, check the first link in my first post and you will see my oc'ed [email protected] benchies.Neo_peter said:
ps... im about to wire wrap it to go for max effort, as batboy would call it.
OP
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2002
- Location
- tOLEDO, OHIO, the heart of it all!
- Thread Starter
- #12
well, i am noticing a big performance difference at higher speeds, this is what i got so far.
OP
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2002
- Location
- tOLEDO, OHIO, the heart of it all!
- Thread Starter
- #13
this is max effort, but still pretty impressive for a celly.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
How bout your 3Dmark scores? do that beat your 1.8A @ 2.4?
OP
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2002
- Location
- tOLEDO, OHIO, the heart of it all!
- Thread Starter
- #15
didnt try, and dont have a desire too.Neo_peter said:
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2001
- Location
- Europe.
Oh cmon what do you think you don't have a desire to??? It would give us a better picture about these celerons. How fast are they really in 3D apps and so on...
It would give us a better picture about these celerons. How fast are they really in 3D apps and so on...- Joined
- Dec 18, 2000
- Location
- Brooklyn Park MN
Hey, JD, not too shabby for a chip that doesn't exist, huh Man, can I be a joker. I haven't had too much time to play with mine the past few days, but seeing what you've done gives me hope. I thought about undervolting mine to see how low I can go before it craps out, but 3.33 out of a "2.0" tain't bad. I might change my mind and go up again.
Man, can I be a joker. I haven't had too much time to play with mine the past few days, but seeing what you've done gives me hope. I thought about undervolting mine to see how low I can go before it craps out, but 3.33 out of a "2.0" tain't bad. I might change my mind and go up again.
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2001
- Location
- Europe.
Nice sig, lyle
Re: Re: Re: celly 2.0 new bang for the buck
Is this the chip here? Im asking because it says its based on the willamette core and still uses the 0.18 micron process. Is this right?
jdmcnudgent said:thanks guys.
Is this the chip here? Im asking because it says its based on the willamette core and still uses the 0.18 micron process. Is this right?
OP
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2002
- Location
- tOLEDO, OHIO, the heart of it all!
- Thread Starter
- #20
Re: Re: Re: Re: celly 2.0 new bang for the buck
thats the chip, but i believe that it uses .13 micron, and i KNOW that it is c1 stepping. you like this chip, wait till the c1 2.a chip comes out, prolly do about the same.Extol said:
