Notices

Overclockers Forums > Hardware > Cooling > Water Cooling
Water Cooling Discussion devoted to blocks, pumps, radiators, reservoirs, tubing, and everything else to get you running smooth on a water loop
Forum Jump

3+ heater cores in parallel

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe Search this Thread
 
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-07-02, 04:49 PM Thread Starter   #1
Mooker
Registered



Join Date: Nov 2001

 
3+ heater cores in parallel


Hey. I was just doin some thinkin and thought about how 3 or 4 heatercores would do in parallel. For like if you had a system with 2 220 watt TECs. Has anyone tried this? Would this type of setup be able to get water temps down to ambient?




Thanks
Mooker is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-07-02, 05:03 PM   #2
nikhsub1
Unoriginal Macho Moderator

 
nikhsub1's Avatar 

Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles

10 Year Badge
 
Re: 3+ heater cores in parallel


Quote:
Originally posted by Mooker
Hey. I was just doin some thinkin and thought about how 3 or 4 heatercores would do in parallel. For like if you had a system with 2 220 watt TECs. Has anyone tried this? Would this type of setup be able to get water temps down to ambient?
That would be a huge waste of time, money and effort, and, you would need like a 1000GPH pump with a 50 foot head. One good heater core would be able to do the job well, 2 in parallel would be good too, anything beyond that is just silly and unneeded.

__________________
Loading Signature ...
nikhsub1 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-07-02, 05:03 PM   #3
cack01
Member

 
cack01's Avatar 

Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San diego or UC Davis

 
It all depends on the fan(s) that you use. You can actually use one heatercore, as long as the fans you use put enough air over the core. With 3-4 cores, you can use smaller weaker fans, and get the same proformance as with 1 giant fan. You may even be able to passivly cool them, but I'm not sure about that. It will be hard to get all of them to have equal flow though, and ofcourse it will need to be a parallel setup.

__________________
LianLi PC70
Dual PIII 1.0@1.2 (7.5*160) on ABIT VP6
768 PC-133
Geforce 4 TI4200 310/580
Sound Blaster Audigy Platinum
2x 40 GB Seagate 5400 w/Striping
1x 80 GB Seagate 7200
24X Yamaha CD-RW
Sony 520GS 21"
cack01 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-07-02, 05:30 PM Thread Starter   #4
Mooker
Registered



Join Date: Nov 2001

 
I kno it would be a waste of money but I was just thinkin. Like cack said maybe if you wanted a passive system of some sort on dual procs or something.
Mooker is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-07-02, 05:35 PM   #5
nikhsub1
Unoriginal Macho Moderator

 
nikhsub1's Avatar 

Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles

10 Year Badge
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Mooker
I kno it would be a waste of money but I was just thinkin. Like cack said maybe if you wanted a passive system of some sort on dual procs or something.
You would also need a mongo pump, like an Iwaki which are mucho $$$$$$.

__________________
Loading Signature ...
nikhsub1 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-07-02, 05:46 PM   #6
Warlord2
Member



Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bakersfield,CA

 
I have 2 rads in parallet right now and I will just say that you dont need nearly as much air flow as you do with only one rad. This is just with a plane h2o setup though. I would NOT go with one rad for two 220 watt tec, you would be MUCH better off with 2 rads sense it almost triples the effecticy as opposed to one radiator.
Warlord2 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-07-02, 11:31 PM   #7
SemiCycle
Member

 
SemiCycle's Avatar 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hampton Roads. VA

 
With more then 2 heatercores (really only one is needed), you would run into diminishing returns quickly. You can only cool the water back down to ambient. Better fans, or corrected mounted and directed fans is a better way to go.

__________________
*Two wrongs don't make a right, but 3 left turns do
*When you don't know what you are doing, do it neatly.


HEATWARE
http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=14214
SemiCycle is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-08-02, 12:07 AM   #8
JasonKosi
Member

 
JasonKosi's Avatar 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: A place where Macs and PCs play well together. The land of lollipops and make-believe! :)

 
I don't think that in parallel would require a larger pump...
In series I can see the necessity for greater water pressure, but not parallel.
JasonKosi is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-08-02, 12:55 AM   #9
none1
Member



Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago, IL

 
OK folks, why would this need to be parallel? Help a n00b out.

I mean, there are cases where one normal heater core won't get the job done. So the question is how to get more cooling? Use a car radiator? (HUGE) or go with multi smaller heater cores?

NOTE This site
http://becooling.safeshopper.com/33/177.htm?210
has a kit with two mini heater cores, and claims it has the same cooling power as a single bigger core. BUT, doesn't say parallel or serial.

thanks

__________________
IT HAS BECOME TIME TO CRUNCH MORE
Dell XPS M1710, core 2 CPU
Alienware quad core extreme dual gforce 280gtx.
Quad core Q6600 - 1, 2 X 260GTX, 216 core
Quad core Q6600 - 2, 2 X 260GTX, 216 core
OLD AMD socket 939, 260GTX 196 core + 8800GTX
HP proliant ML350G4 dual xeon server
2 pcie slots left for more CUDA to be added later ....
none1 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-08-02, 01:42 AM   #10
Warlord2
Member



Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bakersfield,CA

 
one would not be enough for 2 220 watt tec, that would be 550+ watt of heat to remove and one rad isnt going to cut it very well without atleast 2 131cfm fans on it. Believe me you will get lots of improvement with a parallel setup. No you dont need a bigger pump, I was even using a 150gph for a week or so, thin I got this via 1300 wich is working without a problem to push this water. With a parrallel setup the water is being forced to go slower through the rads and faster through the block, this makes it almost 3x more effective thin a single rad.
Warlord2 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-08-02, 02:07 AM   #11
strokeside
Member

 
strokeside's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dublin, Ireland

 
If you had 3 rads in parallel, they would be kind of like a res too, as they hold so much water. In parallel, you would be drawing the water through the rads slower, thereby meeting less resistance to flow compared to if you double the speed (single rad).
And the extra time the water stays in the rad can only help to reduce temps. I think the space you have in your case and how how you have your rads mounted/positioned will determine how much of an improvement you see over normal 1 rad setups.

But anything over two rads(each rad being a heatercore) is serious overkill.
strokeside is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-08-02, 10:26 PM   #12
none1
Member



Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago, IL

 
Quote:
Originally posted by strokeside


But anything over two rads(each rad being a heatercore) is serious overkill.
Depends on the amount of heat, no? < evil >

I haven't had time to jump in WC yet. Plan to this fall sometime. I already posted a few weeks ago. I've got a farm. 12 comps, all on a shelf unit, none in a case, all have fans, one big room fan blowing in from the window. NOISY

So I'm a thinking WC all 12 comps ........ so multi rads sounds good to me. I would not have thought about parallel, slower through the rads gives better cooling, but it makes perfect sense.

Thanks much!

__________________
IT HAS BECOME TIME TO CRUNCH MORE
Dell XPS M1710, core 2 CPU
Alienware quad core extreme dual gforce 280gtx.
Quad core Q6600 - 1, 2 X 260GTX, 216 core
Quad core Q6600 - 2, 2 X 260GTX, 216 core
OLD AMD socket 939, 260GTX 196 core + 8800GTX
HP proliant ML350G4 dual xeon server
2 pcie slots left for more CUDA to be added later ....
none1 is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-09-02, 01:30 AM   #13
Lt. Max
Member

 
Lt. Max's Avatar 

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Seattle, but im Estonian

 
by paralell do u mean in a row or do u mean like from pump it splits into 2 or 3 and then goes thru rads and then joins back together? thats what my friend did

max

__________________
<- pic of my college parking spot
P4 2.4C@3.0, IC-7, 1 gig Buffalo 3700 (200 2-6-2-2)
9600pro - 400@500/300@310
Cascade watercooled
Lt. Max is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-09-02, 08:06 PM   #14
Freeloader
Member



Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Winnipeg

 
Like Warloard2 said, you don't need a bigger pump for a bunch of rads in parallel. Adding rads in parallel reduces resistance and increases overall flow, meaning you could use a smaller pump.

Instead of using a bunch of heatercores, it would be better to use a car rad (you still won't need a large pump). You could then use a large quiet fan, instead of a lot of noiser small fans. This is exactly what I would do if I were runing 2 220watt tecs.

Ideally, you would want to get the water around 2 or 3c above ambient. Getting the water even with ambient would be very difficult and probably not worth the effort (excluding a bong).
Freeloader is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-10-02, 12:19 AM   #15
Kill Control
Registered



Join Date: Sep 2002

 
just get a core 2x as big with dual fans. it seems like it would all work out the same as 2 smaller cores, if not better due to less tubing.
Kill Control is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-10-02, 08:46 AM   #16
Frodo Baggins
Member



Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: City of Dreaming Spires

 
hmm.....depends on the pump. I think no, it would look ugly and has too many problems
Frodo Baggins is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-10-02, 11:20 AM   #17
Hellraiser
Member

 
Hellraiser's Avatar 

Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: vienna, austria, europe, earth

 
pics?


can anyone show me pics of a paralell heatercore setup?
i think setting up a paralell heatercore takes up more space and is more difficult to setup ( hoses ).

i not sure but i think it does make sense that a pump has less work to do when 2 heatercores are paralell than setup in serial, but i think the gain in dropping temps will be the same.
Hellraiser is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-10-02, 12:44 PM   #18
Frodo Baggins
Member



Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: City of Dreaming Spires

 
uh...i dunno if it' worth it. honestly, your gonna hve a pretty ugly setup with 3 rads outside your case, and a bong could prolly beat it. Just remember you may be going to a ton of trouble to get rid of a couple degrees. Like the jump of going from a heatercoreLESS setup to a heatercore setup is big, but from there your trying to fight against the ambiant barrier and you prolly won't be getting much of an increase

I'm not sure however, but my suggestion is forget about thie 3 heatercores in parrallel. Spend your money on quality parts and you can prolly get some better temps
Frodo Baggins is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-10-02, 04:05 PM   #19
Toysrme
Member

 
Toysrme's Avatar 

Join Date: Nov 2001

 
Unless he's talking having to cool massive amounts of power. I don't think it would be feasable.

I mean have you ever noticed that most of the guys that actually check the water temp only rises afew degrees from AMB. in the worst cases? Those last few degrees I feel won't make enough of a differance as is worth the money time and trouble.

-Toysrme

__________________
Toysrme257th - AIM about anything, anytime; including v6 turbos.
World's second Lexus ES 300 Turbo!
Why??? Because cars overclock better than computers...
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...isc/Avatar.jpg
Toysrme is offline   QUOTE Thanks
Old 11-10-02, 04:07 PM   #20
EyelessFace
Member

 
EyelessFace's Avatar 

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: West Virginia

 
Look here

Someone has already done that, take a look and see what he did.
EyelessFace is offline   QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


Overclockers Forums > Hardware > Cooling > Water Cooling
Water Cooling Discussion devoted to blocks, pumps, radiators, reservoirs, tubing, and everything else to get you running smooth on a water loop
Forum Jump

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Mobile Skin
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
You can add these icons by updating your profile information to include your Heatware ID, Benching Profile ID or your Folding/SETI profile ID. Edit your profile!
X

Welcome to Overclockers.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this the best community on the Internet since 1998!


(4 digit year)

Why Join Us?

  • Share experience
  • Max out your hardware
  • Best forum members anywhere
  • Customized forum experience

Already a member?