Quote:
Originally posted by DodgeViper
Remember, AMP X VOLTS = WATTS
1.26 AMP X house current 117 VOLTS =147.42 WATTS
147.42 WATTS of energy added to the water.
This would not be a good buy.
|
Didn't really pay attention to this the first time I saw it.
Amps X Volts = Watts is only guaranteed to be true for DC systems.
For AC systems where the voltage and current are sine waves the equation is:
Amps X Volts X Cosine(phase angle) = Watts
The current through a pump is usually substantially phase shifted with respect to the voltage, which means that the power consumption will be substantially less than the Amps X Volts.
Also, centrifugal pumps draw less power when their output is restricted than when it is wide open. It's very hard to say how much power this pump would consume in a watercooling setup.
Quote:
Originally posted by UnLoadeD
I was looking at the 15rt's but the .82amps kinda scared me off. Do you guys think that would add too much heat to the water?
|
It's seems odd to me that the MD15 draws .82 Amps when the MD20's only draw 0.5 Amps. I'm not sure what to make of that. I think nikhsub1 said somewhere that the power consumption of the MD15 was only a few Watts higher than an Eheim 1250. I haven't seen the power consumption spec'd though.
My MD20RT (220 Volt version) is spec'd to have a maximum current draw of 0.28 Amps and a max power consumption of 57 Watts. It has a big capacitor inside that probably reduces the phase angle of the current though. I'd guess the MD15 just doesn't have a phase correction cap. (This is not a big deal IMO.)
I did some testing on a Danner Mag5. (Spec'd for 45 Watts power consumption) At 122.6V it drew 0.8 Amps with a power consumption of 35 Watts with a 'low' flow restriction. It drew 0.76 amps with a power consumption of 24.6 Watts with a 'high' restriction.
If you can't find a power consumption spec for the MD15, just ask nikhsub1, but I don't think it's something to be too concerned about though.