- Joined
- Jun 9, 2002
- Location
- Ft. Myers, Fl.
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
FSAA Comparison- NV30 vs R9700.... looks bad for...
- Thread starter PreservedSwine
- Start date
OP
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2002
- Location
- Ft. Myers, Fl.
- Thread Starter
- #2
For those too lazy to click on the link, it's an interactive screenshot that allows you to choose what AF level you would like to see reflected in the picture. It offers the same sampling solution available on the R9700 and NV30.
It looks like this:
It only takes a second, and makes for a simple comparison.
It looks like this:
It only takes a second, and makes for a simple comparison.
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2001
yeah i clicked the link, that 6xAA on th 9700 is beautiful
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2002
- Location
- The Darkest Star
is it just me or did even the 4xAA of the 9700 pro walk all over that 8xAA bullsh*t the fx had to offer?
oh yeah and that that 6x is just plain beautiful
oh yeah and that that 6x is just plain beautiful
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2002
- Location
- Best 1/4 Mile Time: 13.57 @ 101.13
Yeah, that 6X is great looking.
Quake3 looks great at 1600x1200 with 6xAA and 16xAF
Quake3 looks great at 1600x1200 with 6xAA and 16xAF
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2001
- Location
- Stillwater, Oklahoma
i think is 6x on the 9700 looks horrible near the 7 o'clock part...and instead of having the lines meet at the center, they put a lense flare so you couldnt see the distortion. 8x on the fx looks great to me, 6x is pretty good, but in no way does the 4x on the radeon beat 8x on the fx, you must be on drugs.
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2002
- Location
- Seattle, WA
RangerJoe said:
Rufuse to give up on nVidia dont u? EVERY SINGLE creditable reviewer must be on drugs then
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2002
- Location
- Best 1/4 Mile Time: 13.57 @ 101.13
Dude, look at the pics again!!! Especially the very center.
The 4x lines on the Radeon are noticeably more defined than the 8XS lines on the GeForce!!!
The 4x lines on the Radeon are noticeably more defined than the 8XS lines on the GeForce!!!
OP
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2002
- Location
- Ft. Myers, Fl.
- Thread Starter
- #9
Stumpjumper5200 said:
Actually, the lines completely dissapear on the NV30 FSAA8x. It simply erases them
Johnny Knoxville
Disabled
- Joined
- May 29, 2002
wow the FX sucks
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2002
- Location
- Between Heaven and Hell
PreservedSwine said:
If it does infact use 3DFX technology, I'd like to take this time to point out that the V5/6 did FSAA at the RAMDAC stage. Screenshots that were taken therefore did not show the true output to the monitor.
I reckon it's much the same for the GFFX. I'm just waiting for one of those reviewers to spend more than 5 mins running 500 benches, posting numbers and actually LOOK at the screen.
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2002
- Location
- Best 1/4 Mile Time: 13.57 @ 101.13
Better?
Anything above 6x...........as long as ATI does it
Anything above 6x...........as long as ATI does it
![]-[itman](/forums/data/avatars/m/9/9309.jpg?1650325391){kind=avatar}
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2001
]-[itman said:Apparently I'm the only one who can't seem to view the page
I can't get there either.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2002
- Location
- U.S., Maryland
Website seems to have gone down.{PMS}fishy said:
Re: Re: FSAA Comparison- NV30 vs R9700.... looks bad for...
I can't access this website anymore either. I was able to access it earlier today.
Yes that's a good point. In fact HardOCP retracted their intial IQ assesment of the FX because they based their analysis on frames captured from the frame buffer if I remember correctly. And the FX performs the AA stuff after this stage.HotKoala said:
I can't access this website anymore either. I was able to access it earlier today.
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2002
- Location
- Seattle, WA
Re: Re: Re: FSAA Comparison- NV30 vs R9700.... looks bad for...
HardOCP asked nVidia about it...it is ONLY Quinx (or whatever the hell its called, lol), and 2x AA that do that, NOT 4x up to 8x...they do it the "traditional" way...so nVidia 8x AGP does infact still suck ***, lol
baraka said:
HardOCP asked nVidia about it...it is ONLY Quinx (or whatever the hell its called, lol), and 2x AA that do that, NOT 4x up to 8x...they do it the "traditional" way...so nVidia 8x AGP does infact still suck ***, lol
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2001
- Location
- Stillwater, Oklahoma
Evnas said:
this is what i have been telling you guys from the beginning!..lol
besides the point that i like nvidia better, i do think some points with 8x on the fx look better than 6x on the radeon
btw, the lines do NOT disappear, you must be blind if you think they disappear with 8x on the fx.
