Welp.. I'm having a prob here that seems to be related to my 1.0ghz tully. But sorry for posting the Q here if the prob really can't be chipset/chip related...
I have two similar Quantum Fireball Plus AS ATA-133 disks, one is in my XP2100+ rig, the other in my Tully 1.0 rig.
The HD in my tully rig runs flat out 50-60% of the time, really racing ahead all of the time, whilst the AMD hardly blinks.
The mobo for the tully is an MSI-6368 5x, which according to their homepages makes it good for ATA100..
I've got 512 mb of ram in the tully-tut, and the pagefile isn't very big, usually swings around 300 megs.
Used mem is never higher than 200 megs, as the tully only folds and serves as an FTP server.
Runs Win2Ksp3
So question really is, if there is something related to the tully that makes it very disk intensive? cache or something? or is it the mobo ****? or the hdd?
I'm lost... advice needed.
Cheers, FLixotide
I have two similar Quantum Fireball Plus AS ATA-133 disks, one is in my XP2100+ rig, the other in my Tully 1.0 rig.
The HD in my tully rig runs flat out 50-60% of the time, really racing ahead all of the time, whilst the AMD hardly blinks.
The mobo for the tully is an MSI-6368 5x, which according to their homepages makes it good for ATA100..
I've got 512 mb of ram in the tully-tut, and the pagefile isn't very big, usually swings around 300 megs.
Used mem is never higher than 200 megs, as the tully only folds and serves as an FTP server.
Runs Win2Ksp3
So question really is, if there is something related to the tully that makes it very disk intensive? cache or something? or is it the mobo ****? or the hdd?
I'm lost... advice needed.
Cheers, FLixotide