Well as I am overclocking this board, it seems like 200FSB really needs voltage, and that makes it unstable. I can run 200FSB at 10x stable.. maaaybe 10.5.
Where is the medium to all of this?
Would it be better to back the FSB down to 160-170, maybe 180 and up the multi to obtain a higher overall clock speed?
What yields the best performance? Is there some sort of rule of thumb here?
IE: if you can go at 160+FSB X 15 multi equalling 2400Mhz then you are better off than 200FSB x 10 = 2000Mhz. Or is the 200Mhz FSB pull off the better performance overall regardless of it lacking 400Mhz in the top end?
Thanks for any and all opinions here!
P.S. What is the highest I can set Vdimm Voltage to be safe?
2.77? Higher lower?
Thanks!
Where is the medium to all of this?
Would it be better to back the FSB down to 160-170, maybe 180 and up the multi to obtain a higher overall clock speed?
What yields the best performance? Is there some sort of rule of thumb here?
IE: if you can go at 160+FSB X 15 multi equalling 2400Mhz then you are better off than 200FSB x 10 = 2000Mhz. Or is the 200Mhz FSB pull off the better performance overall regardless of it lacking 400Mhz in the top end?
Thanks for any and all opinions here!
P.S. What is the highest I can set Vdimm Voltage to be safe?
2.77? Higher lower?
Thanks!