Low Sandra Multimedia 8k3a+

shill82 · 02-13-03, 09:13 PM

Why am I getting such a low Integer score compared with Sandra's default 2800+. I'm running a 1700+ Tbred B at 185*12=2220 100% prime stable. Any info would be appreciated.

Also what Bios would you recomend I was using the latest Official bios then switched to 2815 to see if that was my problem but it solved nothing and added a hint of instability.

System:
8k3a+ Via 4in1 v4.43
AMD 2220Mhz
512MB Samsung PC2700
Geforce4 Ti4200 Det. 42.30whql
that should be all that matters

Thanks
Shawn

Gremlin255 · 02-15-03, 07:06 PM

your result likes about right. Sandra gives lower integer scores compared to there reference cpu numbers . I get 12526/13357
@2250mhz that still doesnt beat their 2600+ reference in integers, but its faster at floating point. So I wouldnt worry about. Just look at your floating point score its beating the 2600+

Tebore · 02-16-03, 01:28 PM

Some back ground apps might be using some CPU cycles. I notice I get lower scores with F@H running, and disabling Antivirus gives another 5-10 points.

Socket eh? · 02-16-03, 05:12 PM

I agree with Gremlin, sandra's referance numbers for anything are always off. Your better off to log your own scores and go against those.

Gremlin255 · 02-16-03, 08:00 PM

It makes me wonder how the guys @ Sandra get their referance numbers, their bs.

02-13-03, 09:13 PM	Thread Starter #1
shill82 Member Join Date: May 2001	Low Sandra Multimedia 8k3a+ Why am I getting such a low Integer score compared with Sandra's default 2800+. I'm running a 1700+ Tbred B at 185*12=2220 100% prime stable. Any info would be appreciated. Also what Bios would you recomend I was using the latest Official bios then switched to 2815 to see if that was my problem but it solved nothing and added a hint of instability. System: 8k3a+ Via 4in1 v4.43 AMD 2220Mhz 512MB Samsung PC2700 Geforce4 Ti4200 Det. 42.30whql that should be all that matters Thanks Shawn __________________ E5300 @ 3450 266X13 4GB PC1066 Geforce 9400GT Nec 3520 DVD Burner Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB Windows 7 Home Premium Heatware
	QUOTE Thanks

02-15-03, 07:06 PM	#2
Gremlin255 Member Join Date: Feb 2003	your result likes about right. Sandra gives lower integer scores compared to there reference cpu numbers . I get 12526/13357 @2250mhz that still doesnt beat their 2600+ reference in integers, but its faster at floating point. So I wouldnt worry about. Just look at your floating point score its beating the 2600+
	QUOTE Thanks

02-16-03, 01:28 PM	#3
Tebore Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Toronto,Canada(I can see you....)	Some back ground apps might be using some CPU cycles. I notice I get lower scores with F@H running, and disabling Antivirus gives another 5-10 points. __________________ UMPC: Asus EEE 701(4G) Laptops: Lenovo T60p Servers: IBM XServ Heatware
	QUOTE Thanks

02-16-03, 05:12 PM	#4
Socket eh? Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Canada (South Korea)	I agree with Gremlin, sandra's referance numbers for anything are always off. Your better off to log your own scores and go against those. __________________ [Alienware M15x] \| i7 940XM 3.2GHz - 4GHz - 5850m 800/1100 1.05v \| \| 8GB DDR3-1333 - WD5000BEKT - Samsung 2494HM \| The coin is still turning.
	QUOTE Thanks

02-16-03, 08:00 PM	#5
Gremlin255 Member Join Date: Feb 2003	It makes me wonder how the guys @ Sandra get their referance numbers, their bs.
	QUOTE Thanks

Low Sandra Multimedia 8k3a+

Internet Services

Website Development

Tech Hardware

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search