snapmando Member Joined Jan 31, 2003 Location Canada Mar 7, 2003 #1 On a XP 2100+ is the L1 cashe supposed to be 64mb? Thanks Snapmando
OC Detective Member Joined Jul 30, 2001 Location Mauritius Mar 7, 2003 #2 snapmando said: On a XP 2100+ is the L1 cashe supposed to be 64mb? Thanks Snapmando Click to expand... No, 64KB of data cache and 64KB of instruction cache = 128KB in total. 64MB? now that would be something!
snapmando said: On a XP 2100+ is the L1 cashe supposed to be 64mb? Thanks Snapmando Click to expand... No, 64KB of data cache and 64KB of instruction cache = 128KB in total. 64MB? now that would be something!
OP snapmando Member Joined Jan 31, 2003 Location Canada Mar 7, 2003 Thread Starter #3 Opps mean't to type kb................. lol
zindane18 Member Joined Oct 22, 2002 Location Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania Mar 7, 2003 #4 128kb on L1 256 on L2 even though my 2200+ read 128 on the L2 also?? dunno, dont care becuase now I have a 2100!
128kb on L1 256 on L2 even though my 2200+ read 128 on the L2 also?? dunno, dont care becuase now I have a 2100!
Fever Member Joined Sep 16, 2002 Location Montreal, Canada Mar 7, 2003 #5 Imagine how huge a chip would be if it had 64MB of cache?
pip Member Joined Dec 18, 2002 Location Oregon, The InteLinux State Mar 7, 2003 #6 not very big, just a TSOP chip with 64mb
G Gnufsh Senior Member Joined Dec 24, 2001 Location Shasta Lake, California Mar 8, 2003 #7 it would be larger than that if it was the same type of cache on the cpu, instead of sdram. (sram, I believe).
it would be larger than that if it was the same type of cache on the cpu, instead of sdram. (sram, I believe).